Japan’s Contribution to International Peace: Restrictions and Advantages

Katsumi Ishizuka
{"title":"Japan’s Contribution to International Peace: Restrictions and Advantages","authors":"Katsumi Ishizuka","doi":"10.30958/ajl.9-3-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Japan is said to be a peace-loving country. In fact, the State’s history indicates that Japan and its politicians have surely sought positive ways to dispatch Japan’s SDF personnel to UN or international operations for the pursuit of UN-centred policy, despite the State’s constitutional constraints. For example, Japan created or amended several laws including the PKO Law in 1992 as well as the JDR Law in 1987 and the Anti-Terrorism Law in 2001. Therefore, one can identify the evolving process of Japan’s contribution to international peace. However, at the time of writing, Japan’s contribution to UN peacekeeping is token. This article points out several restrictions and advantages for Japan to dispatch forces to overseas operations. The restrictions include legal, diplomatic, and situational ones. The advantages include ones due to the State’s record in the UN, due to the state’s diverse and comprehensive approaches to international peace, and those due to the current situation of international peace and security. Japan should take advantage of its middle-power status for its contribution to international peace. Keywords: Japan; International peace; The UN; Middle power","PeriodicalId":184533,"journal":{"name":"ATHENS JOURNAL OF LAW","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATHENS JOURNAL OF LAW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30958/ajl.9-3-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Japan is said to be a peace-loving country. In fact, the State’s history indicates that Japan and its politicians have surely sought positive ways to dispatch Japan’s SDF personnel to UN or international operations for the pursuit of UN-centred policy, despite the State’s constitutional constraints. For example, Japan created or amended several laws including the PKO Law in 1992 as well as the JDR Law in 1987 and the Anti-Terrorism Law in 2001. Therefore, one can identify the evolving process of Japan’s contribution to international peace. However, at the time of writing, Japan’s contribution to UN peacekeeping is token. This article points out several restrictions and advantages for Japan to dispatch forces to overseas operations. The restrictions include legal, diplomatic, and situational ones. The advantages include ones due to the State’s record in the UN, due to the state’s diverse and comprehensive approaches to international peace, and those due to the current situation of international peace and security. Japan should take advantage of its middle-power status for its contribution to international peace. Keywords: Japan; International peace; The UN; Middle power
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本对国际和平的贡献:限制与优势
据说日本是一个爱好和平的国家。事实上,日本的历史表明,日本及其政治家确实寻求积极的方式派遣日本自卫队人员参加联合国或国际行动,以追求以联合国为中心的政策,尽管国家宪法的限制。例如,日本制定或修改了若干法律,包括1992年的PKO法,1987年的JDR法和2001年的反恐怖主义法。因此,人们可以确定日本对国际和平的贡献的演变过程。然而,在撰写本文时,日本对联合国维和行动的贡献只是象征性的。本文指出了日本向海外派遣军队的几点限制和优势。这些限制包括法律限制、外交限制和情境限制。这些优势包括由于该国在联合国的记录,由于该国对国际和平采取了多样化和全面的方法,以及由于国际和平与安全的现状。日本应该利用其中等大国的地位,为国际和平做出贡献。关键词:日本;国际和平;联合国;中间力量
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New Welfare Models and Community Enterprises: Commons and Sustainable Economy Complexity of Legal Harmonisation in Southeast Asia: A Diversity of Legal Systems & Languages Promoting Effective Refugee Protection in India: Balancing National Interests and International Obligations Legal Assessment of the Condition of Recourse to Domestic Judicial Authorities in the Judicial Procedures of the European Court of Human Rights with a view to the Case of Salahuddin Anju and others v. Turkey Network Analysis and Control System in Mega Projects: The Case of PICASP Erasmus Project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1