Companies and Sustainable Development: The Adequacy of Environmental Impact Assessment for the Management of Environmental Risks

E. R. Messias, André L. R. Cateli, Daniel B. Teixeira
{"title":"Companies and Sustainable Development: The Adequacy of Environmental Impact Assessment for the Management of Environmental Risks","authors":"E. R. Messias, André L. R. Cateli, Daniel B. Teixeira","doi":"10.30564/jmser.v5i1.4349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The choice of the environmental risk management instrument to be used within the scope of corporate governance in companies is of paramount importance to avoid or mitigate the triple environmental responsibility to which they are exposed. In this sense, the following research problem arises: The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), an instrument of the National Environment Policy and a model of environmental risk management adopted by some companies, proves to be efficient, effective and effective for the fulfillment of the duty to protect the environmental balance and, therefore, for sustainable development? The present study aims to elucidate this research problem. To this end, analyzes were carried out on risk and environmental damage, from a perspective of the socioenvironmental function of companies today; the need for a new posture by companies in view of the reflexes of environmental risks in business activity; and the question of the adequacy or inadequacy of the EIA as an instrument of the National Environment Policy and as a model for managing environmental risks and damages, in the pursuit of sustainable development. The method of approach used was the deductive one, and the research was carried out using the method of bibliographic procedure, through which research was carried out on books, scientific articles and legislation. The result points out the inefficiency and ineffectiveness of the EIA for the management of environmental risks and, thus, for the fulfillment of the duty to protect the environmental balance by companies.","PeriodicalId":227013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Science & Engineering Research","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management Science & Engineering Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30564/jmser.v5i1.4349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The choice of the environmental risk management instrument to be used within the scope of corporate governance in companies is of paramount importance to avoid or mitigate the triple environmental responsibility to which they are exposed. In this sense, the following research problem arises: The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), an instrument of the National Environment Policy and a model of environmental risk management adopted by some companies, proves to be efficient, effective and effective for the fulfillment of the duty to protect the environmental balance and, therefore, for sustainable development? The present study aims to elucidate this research problem. To this end, analyzes were carried out on risk and environmental damage, from a perspective of the socioenvironmental function of companies today; the need for a new posture by companies in view of the reflexes of environmental risks in business activity; and the question of the adequacy or inadequacy of the EIA as an instrument of the National Environment Policy and as a model for managing environmental risks and damages, in the pursuit of sustainable development. The method of approach used was the deductive one, and the research was carried out using the method of bibliographic procedure, through which research was carried out on books, scientific articles and legislation. The result points out the inefficiency and ineffectiveness of the EIA for the management of environmental risks and, thus, for the fulfillment of the duty to protect the environmental balance by companies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公司与可持续发展:环境风险管理中环境影响评价的充分性
选择在公司治理范围内使用的环境风险管理工具对于避免或减轻公司所面临的三重环境责任至关重要。由此产生了以下研究问题:环境影响评价(EIA)作为国家环境政策的工具和一些公司采用的环境风险管理模式,对于履行保护环境平衡的义务,从而实现可持续发展,证明是高效、有效和有效的。本研究旨在阐明这一研究问题。为此,本文从当今企业的社会环境功能角度,对风险和环境损害进行了分析;鉴于商业活动中环境风险的反映,公司需要采取新的姿态;以及在追求可持续发展的过程中,环境影响评估作为国家环境政策的工具和管理环境风险和损害的模式是否充分的问题。研究方法采用演绎法,采用书目程序法,对图书、科技文章和立法进行研究。结果表明,环境影响评价在环境风险管理、企业履行环境平衡保护义务方面存在低效和无效的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Examining the influence of green transformation on corporate environmental and financial performance: Evidence from Chemical Industries of China A Comprehensive Guide to the COPRAS method for Multi-Criteria Decision Making Ishikawa Diagram, Gray Numbers and Pareto Principle for the Analysis of the Causes of WEEE Production in Cameroon: Case of SMEs Implementing ISO 14001:2015 Back Bay Battery Simulation Reflective Essay Strategies for Adoption of Circular Economy in the Nigeria Construction Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1