Discussion of Issues Related to Score Use and Interpretation of First Spoken and Signed Language Assessments

Patrick Boudreault, B. Camilleri, Charlotte Enns
{"title":"Discussion of Issues Related to Score Use and Interpretation of First Spoken and Signed Language Assessments","authors":"Patrick Boudreault, B. Camilleri, Charlotte Enns","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190885052.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A standardized assessment of spoken languages will collect data from native, monolingual speakers, thus establishing the range of receptive and/or expressive abilities of children across different ages. Similarly, normative data for standardized assessments of signed language are established by collecting data from native signing deaf children. Where the difference arises is the way in which the normative data relate to the target populations and the individuals within those populations who are being assessed. While standardized assessments of spoken language are normed on and predominantly intended for use with native speakers of that language, standardized assessments of signed language are intrinsically designed for use with a heterogenous group of children, of whom only a minority have the opportunity of learning signed language as their native language. In this chapter, key items related to score use and interpretation in first language (L1) assessment that were presented in Chapters 2.1 and 2.2 will be jointly discussed by the authors.","PeriodicalId":150857,"journal":{"name":"The Handbook of Language Assessment Across Modalities","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Handbook of Language Assessment Across Modalities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190885052.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A standardized assessment of spoken languages will collect data from native, monolingual speakers, thus establishing the range of receptive and/or expressive abilities of children across different ages. Similarly, normative data for standardized assessments of signed language are established by collecting data from native signing deaf children. Where the difference arises is the way in which the normative data relate to the target populations and the individuals within those populations who are being assessed. While standardized assessments of spoken language are normed on and predominantly intended for use with native speakers of that language, standardized assessments of signed language are intrinsically designed for use with a heterogenous group of children, of whom only a minority have the opportunity of learning signed language as their native language. In this chapter, key items related to score use and interpretation in first language (L1) assessment that were presented in Chapters 2.1 and 2.2 will be jointly discussed by the authors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
讨论与第一语言及手语评估的分数使用及解释有关的问题
口语的标准化评估将从母语、单语者那里收集数据,从而确定不同年龄儿童的接受和/或表达能力的范围。同样,手语标准化评估的规范性数据是通过收集母语手语聋儿的数据来建立的。产生差异的地方在于规范性数据与目标人群和正在接受评估的这些人群中的个人之间的关系。虽然口语的标准化评估是规范的,而且主要是针对以该语言为母语的人使用,但手语的标准化评估本质上是为异质儿童群体设计的,其中只有少数人有机会将手语作为母语学习。在本章中,作者将共同讨论第2.1章和第2.2章中介绍的与第一语言(L1)评估中的分数使用和解释相关的关键项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Validation of Spoken Language Assessments for Adult L2 Learners Assessing the Oral Language Skills of Bi-/Multilinguals New Technologies in Second Language Signed Assessment Language Assessment Literacy in Second Signed Language Assessment Contexts Discussion on Scoring Issues in Second Signed or Spoken Language Assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1