Reviving Demand-Pull Perspectives: The Effect of Demand Uncertainty and Stagnancy on R&D Strategy.

J. García‐Quevedo, Gabriele Pellegrino, M. Savona
{"title":"Reviving Demand-Pull Perspectives: The Effect of Demand Uncertainty and Stagnancy on R&D Strategy.","authors":"J. García‐Quevedo, Gabriele Pellegrino, M. Savona","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2742123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper looks at the effects of demand uncertainty and stagnancy on firms’ decisions to engage in R&D activities and the amount of financial effort devoted to these. The paper provides a number of contributions to the innovation literature: first, it adds to the revived debate on demand-pull perspectives in innovation studies by examining demand-related (lack of) incentives to invest in innovation. Second, it complements the literature on barriers to innovation by focusing on demand-related obstacles rather than the more frequently explored financial barriers. Third, it analyses whether experiencing demand barriers is a sector-specific feature. Firms active in high- or low-tech manufacturing or in knowledge-intensive or low-tech services might be more or less dependent on demand conditions when deciding to perform R&D. We find that uncertain demand and lack of demand are perceived as two quite distinct barriers. While the perception of a lack of demand has a marked negative impact not only on the amount of investment in R&D but also the likelihood of firms to engage in R&D activities, demand uncertainty seems, on the contrary, to represent an incentive to spend more in R&D, although only in low-tech sectors. We interpret this evidence in terms of the specific phase of the innovation cycle in which decisions to invest in R&D are taken. Sectoral affiliation seems to be playing a role only for demand uncertainty, supporting the conjecture that positive expectations on the presence of adequate market demand are a necessary condition to invest in R&D.","PeriodicalId":320323,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: Research (Sub-Topic)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"164","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERPN: Research (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2742123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 164

Abstract

This paper looks at the effects of demand uncertainty and stagnancy on firms’ decisions to engage in R&D activities and the amount of financial effort devoted to these. The paper provides a number of contributions to the innovation literature: first, it adds to the revived debate on demand-pull perspectives in innovation studies by examining demand-related (lack of) incentives to invest in innovation. Second, it complements the literature on barriers to innovation by focusing on demand-related obstacles rather than the more frequently explored financial barriers. Third, it analyses whether experiencing demand barriers is a sector-specific feature. Firms active in high- or low-tech manufacturing or in knowledge-intensive or low-tech services might be more or less dependent on demand conditions when deciding to perform R&D. We find that uncertain demand and lack of demand are perceived as two quite distinct barriers. While the perception of a lack of demand has a marked negative impact not only on the amount of investment in R&D but also the likelihood of firms to engage in R&D activities, demand uncertainty seems, on the contrary, to represent an incentive to spend more in R&D, although only in low-tech sectors. We interpret this evidence in terms of the specific phase of the innovation cycle in which decisions to invest in R&D are taken. Sectoral affiliation seems to be playing a role only for demand uncertainty, supporting the conjecture that positive expectations on the presence of adequate market demand are a necessary condition to invest in R&D.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
需求拉动视角的复苏:需求不确定性和停滞对研发战略的影响。
本文着眼于需求不确定性和停滞对企业参与研发活动决策的影响,以及投入这些活动的财务努力的数量。本文为创新文献提供了许多贡献:首先,它通过检查与需求相关(缺乏)的创新投资激励,增加了对创新研究中需求拉动视角的重新讨论。其次,它通过关注与需求相关的障碍,而不是更频繁探索的金融障碍,补充了关于创新障碍的文献。第三,分析需求壁垒是否是行业特有的特征。从事高技术或低技术制造业、知识密集型或低技术服务业的企业在决定进行研发时,可能或多或少地依赖于需求条件。我们发现不确定的需求和缺乏需求被认为是两个截然不同的障碍。虽然缺乏需求的感知不仅对研发投资数量有显著的负面影响,而且对企业从事研发活动的可能性也有显著的负面影响,但需求不确定性似乎相反,代表了在研发上投入更多资金的动机,尽管只是在低技术部门。我们根据创新周期的特定阶段来解释这一证据,在这个阶段,人们会做出研发投资的决定。行业从属关系似乎只对需求不确定性起作用,这支持了对存在充足市场需求的积极预期是投资研发的必要条件的猜想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Can Environmental Policy Encourage Technical Change? Emissions Taxes and R&D Investment in Polluting Firms Three Decades of Research on Corporate Governance and R&D Investments: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda The Risk of Caution: Evidence from an R&D Experiment Bilateral R&D Productivity and Supply Chain Networks Notching R&D Investment with Corporate Income Tax Cuts in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1