Primary conservative management of external small-bowel fistulas. Changing composition of fistula series?

Acta chirurgica Scandinavica Pub Date : 1990-06-01
W Rinsema, D J Gouma, M F von Meyenfeldt, C J van der Linden, P B Soeters
{"title":"Primary conservative management of external small-bowel fistulas. Changing composition of fistula series?","authors":"W Rinsema,&nbsp;D J Gouma,&nbsp;M F von Meyenfeldt,&nbsp;C J van der Linden,&nbsp;P B Soeters","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A primary conservative approach was used in treatment of 42 patients with 45 external small-bowel fistulas. Closure of fistula was achieved in 29 patients but failed in 13 (10 died and 3 discharged with open fistula). There was no time-related improvement in closure rate or mortality, probably because of a general shift towards more serious cases. To evaluate this concept more specifically, groups of simple (19) or complicated (23) fistula were distinguished. The 23 patients with complicated fistula were more severely ill, had more sepsis, e.g. intra-abdominal abscess, and were more often treated in the intensive care unit (p less than 0.01) than the 19 with simple fistula. The respective mortality rates were 7/23 and 3/19. All six patients who died of sepsis had complicated fistula. Mortality in the simple fistula group was related to the primary disease. Especially in cases of complicated fistula, further improvements in management of septic complications should be aimed for, to permit success in delayed definitive surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":7005,"journal":{"name":"Acta chirurgica Scandinavica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta chirurgica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A primary conservative approach was used in treatment of 42 patients with 45 external small-bowel fistulas. Closure of fistula was achieved in 29 patients but failed in 13 (10 died and 3 discharged with open fistula). There was no time-related improvement in closure rate or mortality, probably because of a general shift towards more serious cases. To evaluate this concept more specifically, groups of simple (19) or complicated (23) fistula were distinguished. The 23 patients with complicated fistula were more severely ill, had more sepsis, e.g. intra-abdominal abscess, and were more often treated in the intensive care unit (p less than 0.01) than the 19 with simple fistula. The respective mortality rates were 7/23 and 3/19. All six patients who died of sepsis had complicated fistula. Mortality in the simple fistula group was related to the primary disease. Especially in cases of complicated fistula, further improvements in management of septic complications should be aimed for, to permit success in delayed definitive surgery.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体外小肠瘘的初步保守治疗。改变瘘管系列的组成?
采用保守入路治疗42例45例体外小肠瘘。29例患者成功关闭瘘管,13例失败(10例死亡,3例出院时瘘管打开)。关闭率或死亡率没有与时间相关的改善,可能是因为普遍转向更严重的病例。为了更具体地评估这一概念,我们将瘘管分为简单(19)组和复杂(23)组。合并瘘的23例患者病情较单纯瘘的19例更为严重,脓毒症(如腹内脓肿)发生率较高,重症监护病房就诊次数较多(p < 0.01)。死亡率分别为7/23和3/19。6例死于败血症的患者均有并发瘘管。单纯性瘘管组的死亡率与原发疾病有关。特别是在复杂瘘管的情况下,应进一步改善脓毒性并发症的管理,以便在延迟的最终手术中取得成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. Atrial septal defects. Prevention of adhesions by high molecular weight dextran in rats. Re-evaluation in nine experiments. Relevant factors in the prognosis of ductal pancreatic carcinoma. A comparison of polypropylene mesh, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch and polyglycolic acid mesh for the repair of experimental abdominal wall defects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1