Merging verb cluster variation

S. Barbiers, H. J. Bennis, L. Dros-Hendriks
{"title":"Merging verb cluster variation","authors":"S. Barbiers, H. J. Bennis, L. Dros-Hendriks","doi":"10.1075/LV.00008.BAR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this paper we argue that verb clusters in Dutch varieties are merged and linearized in fully ascending (1-2-3) or fully descending (3-2-1) orders. We argue that verb clusters that deviate from these orders involve non-verbal material: adjectival participles, or nominal infinitives. As a result, our approach does not involve any unmotivated movements that are specific for verb clusters.\n Support for our analysis comes from (i) the interpretation of verb clusters; (ii) the fact that order variation depends on the types of verbs involved, which can be explained by selectional requirements of the verbs; and (iii) the geographic co-occurrence patterns of various orders. First, the 1-3-2 and 3-1-2 orders are argued to be ascending orders with a non-verbal 3. Indeed these orders occur in grammars that have ascending, rather than descending, verb clusters. Secondly, the 1-3-2 order is argued to be an interrupted V1-V2 cluster with a non-verbal 3. Indeed, this order is most common in the region where non-verbal material can interrupt the verb cluster.\n Our analysis of word order variation in verb clusters in terms of principles of grammar is further supported by an experiment in which we asked a large number of speakers distributed over the Dutch language area to rank all logically possible orders, including orders that are not common in their own variety of Dutch. The results demonstrate that speakers apply their syntactic knowledge to rank verb cluster orders that they do not use themselves. We argue that this knowledge cannot be due to familiarity with the various orders.","PeriodicalId":103584,"journal":{"name":"Romance Parsed Corpora","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romance Parsed Corpora","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/LV.00008.BAR","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

In this paper we argue that verb clusters in Dutch varieties are merged and linearized in fully ascending (1-2-3) or fully descending (3-2-1) orders. We argue that verb clusters that deviate from these orders involve non-verbal material: adjectival participles, or nominal infinitives. As a result, our approach does not involve any unmotivated movements that are specific for verb clusters. Support for our analysis comes from (i) the interpretation of verb clusters; (ii) the fact that order variation depends on the types of verbs involved, which can be explained by selectional requirements of the verbs; and (iii) the geographic co-occurrence patterns of various orders. First, the 1-3-2 and 3-1-2 orders are argued to be ascending orders with a non-verbal 3. Indeed these orders occur in grammars that have ascending, rather than descending, verb clusters. Secondly, the 1-3-2 order is argued to be an interrupted V1-V2 cluster with a non-verbal 3. Indeed, this order is most common in the region where non-verbal material can interrupt the verb cluster. Our analysis of word order variation in verb clusters in terms of principles of grammar is further supported by an experiment in which we asked a large number of speakers distributed over the Dutch language area to rank all logically possible orders, including orders that are not common in their own variety of Dutch. The results demonstrate that speakers apply their syntactic knowledge to rank verb cluster orders that they do not use themselves. We argue that this knowledge cannot be due to familiarity with the various orders.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合并动词簇变异
在本文中,我们认为荷兰语变体中的动词簇是按完全升序(1-2-3)或完全降序(3-2-1)合并和线性化的。我们认为,偏离这些顺序的动词集群涉及非言语材料:形容词分词或名义不定式。因此,我们的方法不涉及任何特定于动词簇的无动机运动。对我们分析的支持来自(1)动词集群的解释;(ii)顺序变化取决于所涉及的动词类型,这可以通过动词的选择要求来解释;(3)各阶的地理共现模式。首先,1-3-2和3-1-2顺序被认为是带有非语言3的升序。事实上,这些顺序出现在有升序而不是降序动词集群的语法中。其次,1-3-2顺序被认为是一个具有非言语3的中断的V1-V2集群。事实上,这种顺序在非言语材料可以打断动词簇的区域最常见。我们根据语法原则对动词簇词序变化的分析得到了一个实验的进一步支持,在这个实验中,我们要求分布在荷兰语地区的大量说话者对所有逻辑上可能的顺序进行排序,包括在他们自己的荷兰语中不常见的顺序。结果表明,说话者运用句法知识对自己不使用的动词簇顺序进行排序。我们认为,这种知识不可能是由于熟悉各种秩序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Eguren Luis, Olga Fernández-Soriano & Amaya Mendikoetxea (eds.). Rethinking Parameters. The variable use of determiners in Old French and the argument DP hypothesis Diachronic syntax based on constituency and dependency annotated corpora Analyzing the structure of code-switched written texts The challenges and benefits of annotating oral bilingual corpora
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1