Information and the understanding of objective knowledge: a phenomenological study

Liangzhi Yu
{"title":"Information and the understanding of objective knowledge: a phenomenological study","authors":"Liangzhi Yu","doi":"10.1108/jd-08-2022-0171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study aims to investigate how understanding of objective knowledge (as defined by Karl Popper) is experienced by the knowledge recipient and the role that information plays in such understanding.Design/methodology/approachHusserl's phenomenological approach is applied to a sample of undergraduate students' lived experiences of understanding, collected through diaries and interviews.FindingsThis study finds that understanding of certain objective knowledge develops as the knowledge appears and eventually gives itself to consciousness through the information conveying it; different degrees of givenness of the knowledge in consciousness is experienced by the mind as different levels of understanding; a relatively solid understanding is achieved when the knowledge emerges as an erected knowledge-object in consciousness. Understanding of complex objective knowledge requires not only adequate amount (dose) of information but also corroboration of manifold information sources and formats.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings of this study apply to the understanding of objective knowledge as defined by Popper. Further research is needed to examine other types of understanding.Practical implicationsThis study informs educators and LIS professionals the typical phases in the lived experience of understanding objective knowledge, and the role of information in facilitating the understanding; it urges the two professions to take such experience into consideration when designing courses and information products/services, respectively.Originality/valueDrawing on Husserl's phenomenological approach, this study provides an intuitive account of understanding of objective knowledge, and clarifies a number of conceptual confusions within LIS concerning understanding. It may also have some cross-disciplinary relevance for reflecting education objectives and explaining the Aha! experience in psychology.","PeriodicalId":402385,"journal":{"name":"J. Documentation","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Documentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-08-2022-0171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to investigate how understanding of objective knowledge (as defined by Karl Popper) is experienced by the knowledge recipient and the role that information plays in such understanding.Design/methodology/approachHusserl's phenomenological approach is applied to a sample of undergraduate students' lived experiences of understanding, collected through diaries and interviews.FindingsThis study finds that understanding of certain objective knowledge develops as the knowledge appears and eventually gives itself to consciousness through the information conveying it; different degrees of givenness of the knowledge in consciousness is experienced by the mind as different levels of understanding; a relatively solid understanding is achieved when the knowledge emerges as an erected knowledge-object in consciousness. Understanding of complex objective knowledge requires not only adequate amount (dose) of information but also corroboration of manifold information sources and formats.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings of this study apply to the understanding of objective knowledge as defined by Popper. Further research is needed to examine other types of understanding.Practical implicationsThis study informs educators and LIS professionals the typical phases in the lived experience of understanding objective knowledge, and the role of information in facilitating the understanding; it urges the two professions to take such experience into consideration when designing courses and information products/services, respectively.Originality/valueDrawing on Husserl's phenomenological approach, this study provides an intuitive account of understanding of objective knowledge, and clarifies a number of conceptual confusions within LIS concerning understanding. It may also have some cross-disciplinary relevance for reflecting education objectives and explaining the Aha! experience in psychology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信息与对客观知识的理解:现象学研究
本研究旨在探讨知识接受者对客观知识(如卡尔·波普尔所定义)的理解是如何经历的,以及信息在这种理解中所起的作用。设计/方法论/方法胡塞尔的现象学方法被应用于通过日记和访谈收集的本科生的生活理解经验样本。研究发现:对某些客观知识的理解是随着知识的出现而发展的,并最终通过传递知识的信息而转化为意识;意识中知识的不同程度被心灵体验为不同层次的理解;当知识在意识中作为一个竖立的知识客体出现时,就获得了相对牢固的理解。理解复杂的客观知识不仅需要足够的信息量,还需要多种信息来源和格式的佐证。研究的局限性/启示本研究的发现适用于波普尔定义的对客观知识的理解。需要进一步的研究来检验其他类型的理解。实践意义本研究让教育工作者和专业人士了解了理解客观知识的典型阶段,以及信息在促进理解中的作用;委员会促请这两个专业在设计课程和资讯产品/服务时,考虑到这些经验。本研究借鉴胡塞尔的现象学方法,提供了对客观知识理解的直观解释,并澄清了LIS内部关于理解的一些概念混淆。它也可能与反映教育目标和解释Aha!心理学经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The coverage of information science and knowledge organization in the Library of Congress Subject Headings A conceptual framework for motivation factors influencing researchers' use of academic web profiles Affective memories and perceived value: motivators and inhibitors of the data search-access process Perry Starlight, Ali Orbit and Kim Cosmos' alien encounter: creating a picturebook as information for children and parents participating in research Towards a vernacular aesthetics of liking for information studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1