Internet Discourse as a Form of Speech

A. Lipatova
{"title":"Internet Discourse as a Form of Speech","authors":"A. Lipatova","doi":"10.33065/2307-1052-2021-2-36-57-63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditionally, there are distinguished two forms of speech (oral and written). In the era of widespread digitalization, a new (computer-mediated) communication is emerging. The question arises, what form of speech generates a new type of communication, a special - hybrid - form of speech (“oral-written”) or a variety of existing forms. An attempt to answer this question is the task of the article. During the research it was found that the nature of this form is hybrid: it organically combines the beginning of both oral discourse and written speech. At the same time oral and written speech has its own pragmatics, which is different from the pragmatics of known forms of speech. If oral speech is designed to promote communication, written speech is designed to preserve information, then oralwritten discourse is a platform for the realization and manifestation of the individuality of the author of speech. The author of oral and written speech creates his identity, recreates the image of his “I” anew. Hence the leading “modus” of oral and written speech. Oral speech is “over-phonetic”: it has a rich arsenal of verbal and non-verbal means for conveying information, as well as for expressing emotions. Written speech has almost no extra-linguistic, additional means of expression, it is super-grammatical. In the context of oral-written discourse, the individual expresses himself (builds or transforms an already created image) often by playing with the form. Oral-written discourse on the Internet is “super graphic”. The peculiarity of representatives of generation Z lies in the almost simultaneous (parallel) mastery of written and oral-written speech. This cannot but affect the process of mastering writing skills by modern adolescents","PeriodicalId":326234,"journal":{"name":"Volga Region Pedagogical Search","volume":"144 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volga Region Pedagogical Search","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33065/2307-1052-2021-2-36-57-63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditionally, there are distinguished two forms of speech (oral and written). In the era of widespread digitalization, a new (computer-mediated) communication is emerging. The question arises, what form of speech generates a new type of communication, a special - hybrid - form of speech (“oral-written”) or a variety of existing forms. An attempt to answer this question is the task of the article. During the research it was found that the nature of this form is hybrid: it organically combines the beginning of both oral discourse and written speech. At the same time oral and written speech has its own pragmatics, which is different from the pragmatics of known forms of speech. If oral speech is designed to promote communication, written speech is designed to preserve information, then oralwritten discourse is a platform for the realization and manifestation of the individuality of the author of speech. The author of oral and written speech creates his identity, recreates the image of his “I” anew. Hence the leading “modus” of oral and written speech. Oral speech is “over-phonetic”: it has a rich arsenal of verbal and non-verbal means for conveying information, as well as for expressing emotions. Written speech has almost no extra-linguistic, additional means of expression, it is super-grammatical. In the context of oral-written discourse, the individual expresses himself (builds or transforms an already created image) often by playing with the form. Oral-written discourse on the Internet is “super graphic”. The peculiarity of representatives of generation Z lies in the almost simultaneous (parallel) mastery of written and oral-written speech. This cannot but affect the process of mastering writing skills by modern adolescents
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网络话语作为一种言语形式
传统上,有两种不同的语言形式(口头和书面)。在广泛数字化的时代,一种新的(以计算机为媒介的)通信正在出现。问题来了,什么样的语言形式产生了一种新的交流类型,是一种特殊的混合语言形式(“口头-书面”),还是多种现有的语言形式。本文的任务就是试图回答这个问题。在研究过程中发现,这种形式的本质是混合的:它有机地结合了口头话语和书面话语的开始。同时,口语和书面语用也有自己的语用学,它不同于已知语言形式的语用学。如果说口头言语的目的是促进交流,书面言语的目的是保存信息,那么口头话语就是言语作者实现和表现个性的平台。口头和书面演讲的作者创造了他的身份,重新创造了他的“我”的形象。因此,口头和书面讲话的主要“方式”。口语是“过度语音”的:它有丰富的语言和非语言手段来传达信息,以及表达情感。书面语言几乎没有额外的语言表达方式,它是超语法的。在口头-书面话语的语境中,个体通常通过玩弄形式来表达自己(构建或改造已经创造的形象)。网络上的口述话语是“超级图形化”的。Z世代代表的特点在于几乎同时(平行)掌握书面和口头-书面语言。这不能不影响现代青少年掌握写作技巧的过程
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Developing Academic Mobility of Students at Mari State University University in Cultural Dimension of Urban Ecosystem: Analysis of Russian Experience and Modern International Trends Ethics and Etiquette in Intercultural Scientific Communication Universities Joining the International Scientific and Educational Space: Experience and Problems (Experience of the European North of Russia) Practice of Academic Mobility of Astrakhan State Medical University
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1