Analyzing the effect of electric power industry reforms in Korea

Y. Yoon, Sun-kyo Kim, Ho-chul Lee, Jong-keun Park
{"title":"Analyzing the effect of electric power industry reforms in Korea","authors":"Y. Yoon, Sun-kyo Kim, Ho-chul Lee, Jong-keun Park","doi":"10.1109/DRPT.2008.4523401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we introduce a general framework for evaluating the effect of first stage of electric power industry reforms in Korea by measuring and comparing the performance of electric power industry before and after the initiation of reforms. Understanding the effect of the first stage of reform can provide some valuable guidelines to how to implement the reforms. Keep in mind that the CBP market in Korea created through the implementation of the first stage of reforms is quite different from the usual sense of markets being implemented in US and other restructured regions. The proposed framework is constructed by first breaking the industry into essential functions that need to be carried out through value-chain analysis. Then, focusing on the generation business area, the specific functions and the sub-functions are defined and put into the form suitable for applying so-called performance-benchmarking technique. Once the specific functions are defined, then the efficiency measures are computed per each function using one of many effective methods. After evaluating the performance of industry through efficiency measures using the performance-benchmarking technique within the proposed framework, the externalities are considered such that the factors which affect the performance but have little to do with industry reforms are reasoned out thus forming a logical counterfactual. The comparison of industry performance between the actual outcome and the logical counterfactual leads to the proper evaluation. An illustrative example is presented in that the general framework introduced in this paper is then used to measure the efficiency of generation companies and/or generation units carrying out their respective functions from 1995 to 2006 and calculates the performance of electric power industry in Korea associated with these efficiency measures.","PeriodicalId":240420,"journal":{"name":"2008 Third International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 Third International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DRPT.2008.4523401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper we introduce a general framework for evaluating the effect of first stage of electric power industry reforms in Korea by measuring and comparing the performance of electric power industry before and after the initiation of reforms. Understanding the effect of the first stage of reform can provide some valuable guidelines to how to implement the reforms. Keep in mind that the CBP market in Korea created through the implementation of the first stage of reforms is quite different from the usual sense of markets being implemented in US and other restructured regions. The proposed framework is constructed by first breaking the industry into essential functions that need to be carried out through value-chain analysis. Then, focusing on the generation business area, the specific functions and the sub-functions are defined and put into the form suitable for applying so-called performance-benchmarking technique. Once the specific functions are defined, then the efficiency measures are computed per each function using one of many effective methods. After evaluating the performance of industry through efficiency measures using the performance-benchmarking technique within the proposed framework, the externalities are considered such that the factors which affect the performance but have little to do with industry reforms are reasoned out thus forming a logical counterfactual. The comparison of industry performance between the actual outcome and the logical counterfactual leads to the proper evaluation. An illustrative example is presented in that the general framework introduced in this paper is then used to measure the efficiency of generation companies and/or generation units carrying out their respective functions from 1995 to 2006 and calculates the performance of electric power industry in Korea associated with these efficiency measures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析韩国电力产业改革的效果
本文通过对韩国电力行业改革前后的绩效进行衡量和比较,提出了一个评估韩国电力行业改革第一阶段效果的总体框架。了解第一阶段改革的效果可以为如何实施改革提供一些有价值的指导。请记住,通过实施第一阶段改革而创建的韩国CBP市场与美国和其他重组地区实施的通常意义上的市场有很大不同。提出的框架是通过首先将行业分解为需要通过价值链分析进行的基本功能来构建的。然后,针对发电业务领域,定义具体功能和子功能,并将其转化为适合应用所谓绩效标杆技术的形式。一旦定义了特定的功能,那么使用许多有效方法中的一种来计算每个功能的效率度量。在本文提出的框架内,通过使用绩效基准技术的效率措施评估行业绩效后,考虑到外部性,从而推断出影响绩效但与行业改革无关的因素,从而形成逻辑反事实。将行业绩效的实际结果与逻辑反事实结果进行比较,有助于做出正确的评价。一个说明性的例子是,本文中介绍的一般框架随后被用来衡量1995年至2006年期间发电公司和/或发电单位执行各自职能的效率,并计算与这些效率措施相关的韩国电力行业的绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transmission loss allocation using normalized loss weight factors Congestion management based on dynamic zoning and coordinated auctioning method Experimental study on the magnetic-controlled switcher type fault current limiter The simulating research on a improved magnetic shielding type of HTSCFCL Distribution feeder one-line diagrams automatic generation from geographic diagrams based on GIS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1