ICO Market Report 2017. Performance Analysis of Initial Coin Offerings (Presentation Slides)

Lars Haffke, Mathias Fromberger
{"title":"ICO Market Report 2017. Performance Analysis of Initial Coin Offerings (Presentation Slides)","authors":"Lars Haffke, Mathias Fromberger","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3309271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) are currently one of the most fashionable topics in the area of financial markets. For token issuers, they are a success story. By the end of 2018 nearly $ 30 billion dollars have been raised in ICOs. From the investors’ perspective, however, things do not look so shiny. Lots of them claim to have lost significant amounts of money invested in tokens issued by more or less reputable companies. \n \nIn this market report, we analyze the ICOs of 2017. We illustrate the ICO market of that year and scrutinize how prices of the issued tokens have developed until today. Thereby, we take the perspective of an investor that bought tokens initially from the issuer. We found that investors, which invested in ICOs during 2017, had, at first, a 50% chance that their tokens traded above their ICO issue price after six months. Yet, things have changed over time. By mid-December 2018, the vast majority of those tokens are in the red. 55% of tokens have lost substantially all their value. Nevertheless, it is our view that it would be too hasty to predict the end of ICOs from these numbers.","PeriodicalId":414983,"journal":{"name":"IRPN: Innovation & Finance (Topic)","volume":"143 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRPN: Innovation & Finance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3309271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) are currently one of the most fashionable topics in the area of financial markets. For token issuers, they are a success story. By the end of 2018 nearly $ 30 billion dollars have been raised in ICOs. From the investors’ perspective, however, things do not look so shiny. Lots of them claim to have lost significant amounts of money invested in tokens issued by more or less reputable companies. In this market report, we analyze the ICOs of 2017. We illustrate the ICO market of that year and scrutinize how prices of the issued tokens have developed until today. Thereby, we take the perspective of an investor that bought tokens initially from the issuer. We found that investors, which invested in ICOs during 2017, had, at first, a 50% chance that their tokens traded above their ICO issue price after six months. Yet, things have changed over time. By mid-December 2018, the vast majority of those tokens are in the red. 55% of tokens have lost substantially all their value. Nevertheless, it is our view that it would be too hasty to predict the end of ICOs from these numbers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2017年ICO市场报告。首次代币发行的业绩分析(演示幻灯片)
首次代币发行(ico)目前是金融市场领域最热门的话题之一。对于代币发行者来说,它们是一个成功的故事。到2018年底,ico已经筹集了近300亿美元。然而,从投资者的角度来看,事情看起来并不那么光明。他们中的许多人声称已经损失了大量的资金,投资于或多或少有信誉的公司发行的代币。在这份市场报告中,我们分析了2017年的ico。我们展示了当年的ICO市场,并仔细研究了发行代币的价格是如何发展到今天的。因此,我们从最初从发行人那里购买代币的投资者的角度来看。我们发现,在2017年期间投资ICO的投资者,最初有50%的机会在六个月后他们的代币交易价格高于ICO发行价。然而,随着时间的推移,情况发生了变化。到2018年12月中旬,绝大多数代币都处于亏损状态。55%的代币几乎失去了全部价值。然而,我们认为,从这些数字来预测ico的终结还为时过早。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cryptocurrency, Mining Pools' Concentration, and Asset Prices Cryptocurrency, green and fossil fuel investments Property rights in the Crypto age: NFTs and the auctioning of limited edition artwork Does One Size Fit All? Comparing the Determinants of Fintech Market Segments Expansion (Conference Presentation) Bubbles in Ethereum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1