DETERMINAN KINERJA KEUANGAN DAN DAMPAK MODERASI STRATEGI BERSAING

R. Sitorus, Wimbildon Sihotang
{"title":"DETERMINAN KINERJA KEUANGAN DAN DAMPAK MODERASI STRATEGI BERSAING","authors":"R. Sitorus, Wimbildon Sihotang","doi":"10.52447/jam.v2i1.912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted to examine the effect of promotional costs and debt policy on financial performance with competitive strategy as moderating. Research was conducted on property and real estate companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange. The independent variables of this research are the cost of sale by proxy log promotional costs and debt policy with proxy Debt To Equity Ratio (DER). The dependent variable of this research is financial performance calculated using Return On Equity (ROE) with a competitive strategy as moderating using proxies are cost leadership was measured by Utiliziation Asset Efficiency (AUE) and differentiation was measured using the Premium Price Capability (PPC). The samples used were 29 properties and real estate companies listed on the stock exchange during the period 2011-2015 and generate profits. This study was conducted descriptive and use multiple regression. The research proved that the fee did not significantly affect the Promotion of Financial Performance. Debt policy significantly affected financial performance. Moderation Cost Leadership Competitive Strategy and Competitive Differentiation Strategy significantly affected financial performance. Cost Leadership Competitive Strategy and Competitive Differentiation Strategy can not amplify the effect of the fee on the Promotion of Financial Performance. Competitive Cost Leadership strategy, were not able to moderate the influence of Debt Policy on Financial Performance. Differentiation Competitive Strategy was able to moderate the influence of Debt Policy on Financial Performance.","PeriodicalId":447299,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Akuntansi Manajerial (Managerial Accounting Journal)","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Akuntansi Manajerial (Managerial Accounting Journal)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52447/jam.v2i1.912","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was conducted to examine the effect of promotional costs and debt policy on financial performance with competitive strategy as moderating. Research was conducted on property and real estate companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange. The independent variables of this research are the cost of sale by proxy log promotional costs and debt policy with proxy Debt To Equity Ratio (DER). The dependent variable of this research is financial performance calculated using Return On Equity (ROE) with a competitive strategy as moderating using proxies are cost leadership was measured by Utiliziation Asset Efficiency (AUE) and differentiation was measured using the Premium Price Capability (PPC). The samples used were 29 properties and real estate companies listed on the stock exchange during the period 2011-2015 and generate profits. This study was conducted descriptive and use multiple regression. The research proved that the fee did not significantly affect the Promotion of Financial Performance. Debt policy significantly affected financial performance. Moderation Cost Leadership Competitive Strategy and Competitive Differentiation Strategy significantly affected financial performance. Cost Leadership Competitive Strategy and Competitive Differentiation Strategy can not amplify the effect of the fee on the Promotion of Financial Performance. Competitive Cost Leadership strategy, were not able to moderate the influence of Debt Policy on Financial Performance. Differentiation Competitive Strategy was able to moderate the influence of Debt Policy on Financial Performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
财务绩效保证和竞争策略的适度影响
本研究以竞争策略为调节因子,探讨促销成本与负债政策对财务绩效的影响。研究对象是在印尼证券交易所上市的房地产公司。本研究的自变量为代理日志的销售成本、促销成本和代理债务权益比(DER)的债务政策。本研究的因变量是使用净资产收益率(ROE)计算的财务绩效,竞争策略作为调节使用代理,成本领先是通过利用资产效率(AUE)衡量的,差异化是使用溢价能力(PPC)衡量的。所使用的样本是2011-2015年期间在证券交易所上市并产生利润的29家房地产公司。本研究采用描述性和多元回归方法。研究证明,费用对财务绩效的提升没有显著影响。债务政策显著影响财务业绩。适度成本领先竞争战略和差异化竞争战略显著影响财务绩效。成本领先竞争战略和差异化竞争战略不能放大费用对财务绩效的促进作用。竞争成本领先战略,并不能缓和债务政策对财务绩效的影响。差异化竞争策略能够调节债务政策对财务绩效的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Dan Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Efektivitas Pengelolaan Keuangan Yang Dimoderasikan Dengan Corporate Financial Accountability Pengaruh Kompleksitas Tugas dan Kompetensi Audit Terhadap Kualitas Audit dengan Integritas Auditor sebagai Variabel Moderating Pengaruh Corporate Social Responsibility, Political Connection, Financial Performance, terhadap Reputasi Perusahaan dengan Agresivitas Pajak sebagai Variabel Modersting Pengaruh Literasi Akuntansi dan Pemahaman Etika Profesi Akuntansi Terhadap Komitmen Tidak Korupsi dengan Pendidikan Keluarga Sebagai Pemoderasi Pengaruh Strategi Berkompetisi dan Dukungan Komite Audit terhadap Pergerakan Laba serta Dampaknya terhadap Reaksi Pasar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1