Long-term care provision in Europe: Results of a desk research study

Slavena Manolova, M. Pavlova, Tetiana Stepurko, M. Tambor, W. Groot
{"title":"Long-term care provision in Europe: Results of a desk research study","authors":"Slavena Manolova, M. Pavlova, Tetiana Stepurko, M. Tambor, W. Groot","doi":"10.4467/20842627oz.19.014.11971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes the provision of long-term care across Europe based on data gathered in a desk research. The aim is: (1) to identify indicators of long-term care provision; and (2) to compare the provision of formal and informal care across the European countries. For this purpose, a narrative literature review was carried out to identify relevant indicators. Subsequently, a descriptive analysis was performed to analyse the indicator-related data. The results suggested that there are important differences in the long-term care provision in Europe. Long-term care is provided both at public and private institutions. The entitlement criteria vary among countries. In general, Western and Northern European countries have more generous provision of residential care compared to Eastern and Southern European countries. At the same time, informal care has different roles and it is extremely important in Eastern and Southern European countries. Among all countries, more than half have quality assurance regulations for residential care. However, most of the Southern and Eastern European countries lack information about the quality assurance regulations. In order to monitor the long-term care provision, it is recommended that European countries establish a reporting system to provide annual data. These annual data should be based on identical measurement mechanisms and standardised reporting structure to allow for comparison and improvements of long-term care systems.","PeriodicalId":139863,"journal":{"name":"Zdrowie Publiczne i Zarządzanie","volume":"870 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zdrowie Publiczne i Zarządzanie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/20842627oz.19.014.11971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper describes the provision of long-term care across Europe based on data gathered in a desk research. The aim is: (1) to identify indicators of long-term care provision; and (2) to compare the provision of formal and informal care across the European countries. For this purpose, a narrative literature review was carried out to identify relevant indicators. Subsequently, a descriptive analysis was performed to analyse the indicator-related data. The results suggested that there are important differences in the long-term care provision in Europe. Long-term care is provided both at public and private institutions. The entitlement criteria vary among countries. In general, Western and Northern European countries have more generous provision of residential care compared to Eastern and Southern European countries. At the same time, informal care has different roles and it is extremely important in Eastern and Southern European countries. Among all countries, more than half have quality assurance regulations for residential care. However, most of the Southern and Eastern European countries lack information about the quality assurance regulations. In order to monitor the long-term care provision, it is recommended that European countries establish a reporting system to provide annual data. These annual data should be based on identical measurement mechanisms and standardised reporting structure to allow for comparison and improvements of long-term care systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲长期护理的提供:一项桌面研究的结果
这篇论文描述了在桌面研究中收集的数据为基础的欧洲长期护理的提供。目的是:(1)确定长期护理提供的指标;(2)比较欧洲各国提供的正式和非正式护理。为此,我们进行了一项叙事性文献综述,以确定相关指标。随后,对指标相关数据进行描述性分析。结果表明,在欧洲的长期护理提供有重要的差异。公立和私立机构都提供长期护理。权利标准因国家而异。总的来说,西欧和北欧国家比东欧和南欧国家提供更慷慨的住宿照顾。同时,在东欧和南欧国家,非正式护理发挥着不同的作用,具有极其重要的意义。在所有国家中,一半以上的国家都有关于寄宿照料的质量保证条例。然而,大多数南欧和东欧国家缺乏关于质量保证条例的信息。为了监测长期护理的提供,建议欧洲国家建立一个报告系统,提供年度数据。这些年度数据应基于相同的衡量机制和标准化的报告结构,以便对长期护理系统进行比较和改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Framing public health education to meet the needs of professionals for war and peacebuilding: A commentary Metody i narzędzia Lean Management w zarządzaniu szpitalem – studia przypadków RODO w zdrowiu publicznym – wybrane aspekty praktyczne Wykorzystanie baz danych Narodowego Funduszu Zdrowia przy ocenie dowodów naukowych z praktyki klinicznej Malnutrition among adolescents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1