Possession of significant quantity of narcotic drugs – problem overview in the context of the judgment by the Court of Justice of the European Union dated 11 June 2020 C-634/18

Katarzyna Tkaczyk-Rymanowska
{"title":"Possession of significant quantity of narcotic drugs – problem overview in the context of the judgment by the Court of Justice of the European Union dated 11 June 2020 C-634/18","authors":"Katarzyna Tkaczyk-Rymanowska","doi":"10.16926/gea.2021.02.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the judgment of 11 June 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union took the position that it is not contradictory to the community regulations for courts to decide, on a case-by-case basis, whether or not in a specific case the quantity of drugs possessed by the offender is significant and therefore the penalty should be made more severe. The interpretation of the concept of a ‘significant quantity’ of drugs may be left for the national courts to decide on a case-by-case basis on condition that this interpretation is reasonably foreseeable. This article presents an opinion in the discussion of the problems generated by the concept of significant quantities of narcotic drugs in the Polish criminal law, as specified in article 62(2) of the Act on Counteracting Drug Addiction of 29 July 2005. Most of all, however, the doubts that the judgment of the Court of Justice may raise in the context of the Polish legal order and recognised (and very diverse) case-law.","PeriodicalId":166701,"journal":{"name":"Gubernaculum et Administratio","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gubernaculum et Administratio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16926/gea.2021.02.36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the judgment of 11 June 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union took the position that it is not contradictory to the community regulations for courts to decide, on a case-by-case basis, whether or not in a specific case the quantity of drugs possessed by the offender is significant and therefore the penalty should be made more severe. The interpretation of the concept of a ‘significant quantity’ of drugs may be left for the national courts to decide on a case-by-case basis on condition that this interpretation is reasonably foreseeable. This article presents an opinion in the discussion of the problems generated by the concept of significant quantities of narcotic drugs in the Polish criminal law, as specified in article 62(2) of the Act on Counteracting Drug Addiction of 29 July 2005. Most of all, however, the doubts that the judgment of the Court of Justice may raise in the context of the Polish legal order and recognised (and very diverse) case-law.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拥有大量麻醉药品——欧洲联盟法院2020年6月11日C-634/18号判决背景下的问题概述
在2020年6月11日的判决中,欧洲联盟法院采取的立场是,法院在个案基础上决定在具体案件中罪犯所拥有的毒品数量是否很大,因此处罚是否应该更严厉,这与共同体条例并不矛盾。对“大量”毒品概念的解释可以留给各国法院在个案基础上作出决定,条件是这种解释是合理可预见的。本文就2005年7月29日《反吸毒成瘾法》第62(2)条规定的波兰刑法中大量麻醉药品概念所产生的问题进行了讨论,提出了一种观点。然而,最重要的是,法院的判决可能会在波兰法律秩序和公认的(非常多样化的)判例法的背景下引起怀疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sprawozdanie z Ogólnopolskiej Konferencji Naukowej w ramach XVII Zjazdu Kół Naukowych Prawa Konstytucyjnego pt. „Parlamentaryzm w ujęciu prawnym, historycznym i ekonomicznym” A few reflections on the understanding of modern public administration Complaints about irregularities in the electoral register and the voter list – selected remarks against the background of jurisprudence The Idea of Justice in Historiosophy of Antiquity Historiosophical meaning of law based on a case of Leon Ptrażycki’s psychological law theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1