{"title":"Concluding Remarks","authors":"M. Hesselink","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192843654.003.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 9 presents the main conclusions from this inquiry and also offers a few wider concluding observations on justification, private law essentialism, normative pluralism, democratic compromise, and the limits of legal theory.","PeriodicalId":105562,"journal":{"name":"Justifying Contract in Europe","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Justifying Contract in Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192843654.003.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Chapter 9 presents the main conclusions from this inquiry and also offers a few wider concluding observations on justification, private law essentialism, normative pluralism, democratic compromise, and the limits of legal theory.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
