An Examination of the Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Nurses’ Attitudes toward Obesity and Obese Patients (Natoops) Scale

T. Menekli, Y. Yıldırım, Ç. Fadıloğlu
{"title":"An Examination of the Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Nurses’ Attitudes toward Obesity and Obese Patients (Natoops) Scale","authors":"T. Menekli, Y. Yıldırım, Ç. Fadıloğlu","doi":"10.31031/cojnh.2018.03.000559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Nurses’ Attitudes toward Obesity and Obese Patients (NATOOPS) Scale, and to provide a scale to be used in this area in Turkey. Method: Forward-backward translation of the NATOOPS from English to Turkish. The translated instrument administered 360 nurses working in the internal medicine and surgery clinics of a university hospital in Izmir, Turkey. The size of the sample was arranged so as to be ten times the number of items on the scale. A Nurses’ Identification Form and the NATOOP) Scale were used as instruments to collect data. Result: Construct validity was tested by factor analysis. The Cronbachalpha coefficient the test-retest reliability coefficient and the item-total correlation were calculated. The scale was applied to 30 nurses twice, at the start and after two weeks. The views of 13 experts were sought on content validity, and their scores in the analysis were found to be compatible (KW=0.159, p=0.08). The Cronbachalpha coefficient obtained for the whole scale was 0.92. In the item analysis, the item-total correlation coefficient of items on the scale varied between 0.46 and 0.91, and no item was removed from the scale as a result. When test-retest was applied to test the invariability of the scale over time, a single factor was obtained explaining 74.17% of the total variance of the scale","PeriodicalId":356179,"journal":{"name":"COJ Nursing & Healthcare","volume":"141 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COJ Nursing & Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31031/cojnh.2018.03.000559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Nurses’ Attitudes toward Obesity and Obese Patients (NATOOPS) Scale, and to provide a scale to be used in this area in Turkey. Method: Forward-backward translation of the NATOOPS from English to Turkish. The translated instrument administered 360 nurses working in the internal medicine and surgery clinics of a university hospital in Izmir, Turkey. The size of the sample was arranged so as to be ten times the number of items on the scale. A Nurses’ Identification Form and the NATOOP) Scale were used as instruments to collect data. Result: Construct validity was tested by factor analysis. The Cronbachalpha coefficient the test-retest reliability coefficient and the item-total correlation were calculated. The scale was applied to 30 nurses twice, at the start and after two weeks. The views of 13 experts were sought on content validity, and their scores in the analysis were found to be compatible (KW=0.159, p=0.08). The Cronbachalpha coefficient obtained for the whole scale was 0.92. In the item analysis, the item-total correlation coefficient of items on the scale varied between 0.46 and 0.91, and no item was removed from the scale as a result. When test-retest was applied to test the invariability of the scale over time, a single factor was obtained explaining 74.17% of the total variance of the scale
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土耳其语版护士对肥胖及肥胖病人态度量表效度及信度检验
目的:本研究的目的是检验土耳其版护士对肥胖和肥胖患者的态度(NATOOPS)量表的效度和信度,并提供一个在土耳其这一地区使用的量表。方法:将北约标准从英语向土耳其语进行正反译。翻译后的仪器对土耳其伊兹密尔一所大学医院内科和外科诊所的360名护士进行了管理。样本的大小被安排为秤上项目数量的十倍。采用护士识别表和NATOOP量表进行数据收集。结果:构念效度通过因子分析检验。计算Cronbachalpha系数、重测信度系数和项目-总量相关系数。在开始和两周后两次对30名护士应用该量表。对13位专家的内容效度进行了意见征询,结果发现他们在分析中的得分是一致的(KW=0.159, p=0.08)。整个量表的Cronbachalpha系数为0.92。在项目分析中,量表上的项目-总量相关系数在0.46 - 0.91之间,没有项目被从量表中删除。当采用重测检验来检验量表随时间的不变性时,单因素可以解释量表总方差的74.17%
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How Can We Develop a Standard Interface That Easily Integrates with HL7, Boosting EHR Interoperability? Effects of Kinesiology Taping on Postpartum Muscle Release: Cases of Lithuanian Women’s Importance of Oral Communication in English as a Non-Native Language in Maternity Service in Lithuania: A Narrative Review Experience of Developing a Cognitive Exercise Program in Patients Screened for Breast Cancer - A Pilot Study The Nursing Counselling among Patients Undergoing Mutilating Surgery: An Experimental Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1