BENEFICIARIES’ PERCEPTION OF THE EFFECT OF IFAD-COMMUNITY BASED NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME ON THEIR LIVELIHOOD IN EDO STATE, NIGERIA

G. Alufohai, D. Ugolor, I. I. Edemhanria
{"title":"BENEFICIARIES’ PERCEPTION OF THE EFFECT OF IFAD-COMMUNITY BASED NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME ON THEIR LIVELIHOOD IN EDO STATE, NIGERIA","authors":"G. Alufohai, D. Ugolor, I. I. Edemhanria","doi":"10.22004/AG.ECON.287376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study examined the beneficiaries’ perception of the effect of IFAD-Community-Based Natural Resource Management Programme (CBNRMP) on their livelihood in Edo State. CBNRMP is one of many effort aimed at improving the livelihood of rural dwellers, it is important to examine how far this has been achieved from the beneficiaries’ perspective. The main objective was to ascertain project beneficiaries’ perception of the effectiveness of the programme on their standard of living and assess their satisfaction. Data were collected from 82 CBNRMP beneficiaries randomly sampled from the three agro-ecological zones in the State. Structured questionnaire and interview schedule were employed as instruments of data collection. Data collected were analyzed using frequency counts, means, percentages and satisfaction indices. Perception was rated using the scores from a Likert- type scale. The study found that most beneficiaries in the CBNRM programme were males (80.5%), small scale operators (average = 2.9ha) with their average age being 49 years (46.3%). About 50% of beneficiaries felt they benefited more regularly from the agricultural credit than other activities undertaken ( X = 3.27). Respondents claimed that many of the trainings given and inputs provided were not regular. Most programme beneficiaries agreed that their participation in the programme positively enhanced their living standards in areas such as farm expansion (X =3.49), improved household feeding (3.44) among others. A grand mean satisfaction index of 3.05 indicated general satisfaction. It was recommended that the programmes be adopted to transform agriculture in Edo State in line with the Agricultural Transformation Agenda because of its effect on the livelihood of beneficiaries Keywords : Perception, beneficiaries, community-based, natural resource, management","PeriodicalId":273470,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Rural Sociology","volume":"19 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Rural Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.287376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study examined the beneficiaries’ perception of the effect of IFAD-Community-Based Natural Resource Management Programme (CBNRMP) on their livelihood in Edo State. CBNRMP is one of many effort aimed at improving the livelihood of rural dwellers, it is important to examine how far this has been achieved from the beneficiaries’ perspective. The main objective was to ascertain project beneficiaries’ perception of the effectiveness of the programme on their standard of living and assess their satisfaction. Data were collected from 82 CBNRMP beneficiaries randomly sampled from the three agro-ecological zones in the State. Structured questionnaire and interview schedule were employed as instruments of data collection. Data collected were analyzed using frequency counts, means, percentages and satisfaction indices. Perception was rated using the scores from a Likert- type scale. The study found that most beneficiaries in the CBNRM programme were males (80.5%), small scale operators (average = 2.9ha) with their average age being 49 years (46.3%). About 50% of beneficiaries felt they benefited more regularly from the agricultural credit than other activities undertaken ( X = 3.27). Respondents claimed that many of the trainings given and inputs provided were not regular. Most programme beneficiaries agreed that their participation in the programme positively enhanced their living standards in areas such as farm expansion (X =3.49), improved household feeding (3.44) among others. A grand mean satisfaction index of 3.05 indicated general satisfaction. It was recommended that the programmes be adopted to transform agriculture in Edo State in line with the Agricultural Transformation Agenda because of its effect on the livelihood of beneficiaries Keywords : Perception, beneficiaries, community-based, natural resource, management
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚埃多州,受益人对农发基金社区自然资源管理方案对其生计的影响的看法
这项研究审查了受益人对农发基金社区自然资源管理方案对他们在江户州生计的影响的看法。CBNRMP是旨在改善农村居民生计的众多努力之一,重要的是要从受益者的角度审查这方面取得了多大进展。主要目标是确定项目受益人对方案对其生活水平的有效性的看法,并评价他们的满意程度。数据收集自该邦三个农业生态区随机抽样的82名CBNRMP受益人。采用结构化问卷和访谈表作为数据收集工具。使用频率计数、平均值、百分比和满意度指数对收集到的数据进行分析。知觉是用李克特量表的分数来评定的。研究发现,CBNRM方案的大多数受益者是男性(80.5%),小规模经营者(平均= 2.9公顷),平均年龄为49岁(46.3%)。大约50%的受益人认为,他们从农业信贷中获得的收益比其他活动更有规律(X = 3.27)。受访者声称,许多提供的培训和投入都不是定期的。大多数方案受益人同意,他们参加方案积极提高了他们在诸如扩大农场(X =3.49)、改善家庭喂养(3.44)等领域的生活水平。大平均满意度指数为3.05,表示总体满意。根据《农业转型议程》,建议通过方案改造江户州的农业,因为它对受益者的生计有影响。关键词:感知、受益者、社区、自然资源、管理
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Participation of community leaders in conflict resolution among crop farmers and Fulani herdsmen in Oyo state, Nigeria Comparative analysis of rural households' wellbeing in selected states of the Niger Delta zone of Nigeria READERS’ PERCEPTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT INCLINATION OF ORIWU SUN COMMUNITY NEWSPAPER IN IKORODU AREA OF LAGOS STATE Agro-forestry as a strategy for environmental conservation and sustainable peace in Sudano-Sahelian zone of northern Nigeria SOCIAL FACTORS AFFECTING LIVELIHOOD STRATEGIES OF RURAL HOUSEHOLDS IN SOUTH-EAST NIGERIA: IMPLICATION FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1