A Critical Appraisal of Compliance with the Compulsory Treatment and Care for Victims of Gunshot Act 2017

Oluseye Judes Olujimi, B. Eniola
{"title":"A Critical Appraisal of Compliance with the Compulsory Treatment and Care for Victims of Gunshot Act 2017","authors":"Oluseye Judes Olujimi, B. Eniola","doi":"10.58425/ajlps.v2i2.180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The practice of demanding police report before gunshot injury victims receive medical care in Nigeria has led to needless loss of life in several instances. The practice stems from the (mis)application of the Robbery and Firearms (Special provision) Act 1984. Thus, the Compulsory Treatment and Care for Victims of Gunshot Act 2017 was enacted to mandate expedite medical treatment for gunshot victims without demand for police report. \nMethods: Adopting the doctrinal research methodology, this paper assessed the legacy of the Robbery and Firearms Act on the treatment of gunshot injury victims. It equally examined medical practitioners’ level of compliance with the provisions of the Compulsory Treatment and Care for Victims of Gunshot Act 2017 and the legal implication of non-compliance, while highlighting remedial options available under the law. \nResults: The study found that despite the provisions of the Compulsory Treatment and Care for Victims of Gunshot Act 2017, gunshot victims are still haunted by the ghost of the Robbery and Firearms (Special Provision) Act. Medical practitioners are still uneasy about the treatment of gunshot casualties without police reports due to apprehension about police harassment. \nConclusion: This paper concludes that the lack of publicity about the current realities of the law and lack of coordination between medical practitioners, police officers and other key stakeholders is responsible for non-compliance with the Act. \nRecommendation: The study therefore recommends the need for enforcement of professional and penal sanctions against erring medical practitioners who fail to provide expedite medical treatment for gunshot injury victims. \n ","PeriodicalId":302325,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Law and Political Science","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Law and Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58425/ajlps.v2i2.180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The practice of demanding police report before gunshot injury victims receive medical care in Nigeria has led to needless loss of life in several instances. The practice stems from the (mis)application of the Robbery and Firearms (Special provision) Act 1984. Thus, the Compulsory Treatment and Care for Victims of Gunshot Act 2017 was enacted to mandate expedite medical treatment for gunshot victims without demand for police report. Methods: Adopting the doctrinal research methodology, this paper assessed the legacy of the Robbery and Firearms Act on the treatment of gunshot injury victims. It equally examined medical practitioners’ level of compliance with the provisions of the Compulsory Treatment and Care for Victims of Gunshot Act 2017 and the legal implication of non-compliance, while highlighting remedial options available under the law. Results: The study found that despite the provisions of the Compulsory Treatment and Care for Victims of Gunshot Act 2017, gunshot victims are still haunted by the ghost of the Robbery and Firearms (Special Provision) Act. Medical practitioners are still uneasy about the treatment of gunshot casualties without police reports due to apprehension about police harassment. Conclusion: This paper concludes that the lack of publicity about the current realities of the law and lack of coordination between medical practitioners, police officers and other key stakeholders is responsible for non-compliance with the Act. Recommendation: The study therefore recommends the need for enforcement of professional and penal sanctions against erring medical practitioners who fail to provide expedite medical treatment for gunshot injury victims.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对《2017年枪击受害者强制治疗和护理法》遵守情况的批判性评估
目的:在尼日利亚,要求警方在枪伤受害者接受医疗之前报告的做法导致了几次不必要的生命损失。这种做法源于1984年《抢劫和火器(特别规定)法》的(错误)适用。因此,颁布了《2017年枪击受害者强制治疗和护理法》,要求在不要求警方报告的情况下加快对枪击受害者的医疗。方法:采用理论研究方法,评估《抢劫与枪支法》对枪伤受害者治疗的影响。它还审查了医疗从业人员遵守《2017年枪击受害者强制治疗和护理法》规定的程度,以及不遵守规定的法律含义,同时强调了法律规定的补救办法。结果:研究发现,尽管有《2017年枪击受害者强制治疗和护理法》的规定,但枪击受害者仍然被《抢劫和枪支(特别规定)法》的幽灵所困扰。由于担心警察骚扰,医生仍然对在没有警方报告的情况下治疗枪伤伤亡者感到不安。结论:本文得出的结论是,缺乏对现行法律现实的宣传以及医生、警察和其他关键利益相关者之间缺乏协调是不遵守该法的原因。建议:因此,研究报告建议,有必要对未能迅速为枪伤受害者提供医疗服务的犯错医务人员实施专业和刑事制裁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Move towards Improving Good Governance in Kenya- Roles of Citizens in Promoting Good Governance Government of Afghanistan Republic from Revolution to Collapse: A Realist Perspective on Political Dominance The Causes of Penalty Aggravation in the Penal Code of Afghanistan, and the Islamic Penal Law of Iran: A Comparative Study The Rights of Religious Minorities in International Legal Documents and Islamic Shariah Public Policy as A Ground for Refusing Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: New York Convention, UNCITRAL Model Law and Afghanistan Arbitration Law Perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1