A comparison study between seven procedures to predict vortex-induced vibrations on industrial chimneys

P. Grala, A. Loredo-Souza, M. M. Rocha
{"title":"A comparison study between seven procedures to predict vortex-induced vibrations on industrial chimneys","authors":"P. Grala, A. Loredo-Souza, M. M. Rocha","doi":"10.5335/rsaee.v15i2.7245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Structures like towers and industrial chimneys are quite vulnerable to the vortex shedding phenomenon, due to their slenderness and non-aerodynamic form. Furthermore, due to their low structural damping, these structures are also more likely to reach large displacement amplitudes, which is caused by the lock-in effect. Although these structures are considered simple from the structural and aerodynamic viewpoints, the study of crosswind vibrations in these structures is quite complicated, as it involves the interaction of complex topics of fluid and structural mechanics, turning a reliable determination of the structural response into one of the most complicated problems in Wind Engineering. Because of that, this study aimed to compare some methods for predicting the response due to the vortex shedding phenomenon using full scale data from industrial chimneys. The chosen methods, which are exposed in codes and standards like Eurocode, National Building Code of Canada and CICIND Model Code for Steel Chimneys, derive from the Ruscheweyh’s correlation length model and the Vickery & Basu’s spectral mathematical model. In addition, these methods are also compared to three proposals made for the Brazilian Wind Code. This study concludes that the methods based on the Vickery and Basu’s model work better for large displacement amplitudes.","PeriodicalId":263272,"journal":{"name":"Revista Sul-americana de Engenharia Estrutural","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Sul-americana de Engenharia Estrutural","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5335/rsaee.v15i2.7245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Structures like towers and industrial chimneys are quite vulnerable to the vortex shedding phenomenon, due to their slenderness and non-aerodynamic form. Furthermore, due to their low structural damping, these structures are also more likely to reach large displacement amplitudes, which is caused by the lock-in effect. Although these structures are considered simple from the structural and aerodynamic viewpoints, the study of crosswind vibrations in these structures is quite complicated, as it involves the interaction of complex topics of fluid and structural mechanics, turning a reliable determination of the structural response into one of the most complicated problems in Wind Engineering. Because of that, this study aimed to compare some methods for predicting the response due to the vortex shedding phenomenon using full scale data from industrial chimneys. The chosen methods, which are exposed in codes and standards like Eurocode, National Building Code of Canada and CICIND Model Code for Steel Chimneys, derive from the Ruscheweyh’s correlation length model and the Vickery & Basu’s spectral mathematical model. In addition, these methods are also compared to three proposals made for the Brazilian Wind Code. This study concludes that the methods based on the Vickery and Basu’s model work better for large displacement amplitudes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测工业烟囱涡激振动的七种方法之比较研究
像塔和工业烟囱这样的结构,由于它们的细长和非气动形式,很容易受到旋涡脱落现象的影响。此外,由于结构阻尼较低,这些结构也更容易达到大的位移幅值,这是由锁定效应引起的。虽然从结构和空气动力学的角度来看,这些结构被认为是简单的,但研究这些结构的侧风振动是相当复杂的,因为它涉及流体力学和结构力学的复杂主题的相互作用,使结构响应的可靠确定成为风工程中最复杂的问题之一。因此,本研究旨在利用工业烟囱的全尺寸数据,比较几种预测涡旋脱落现象响应的方法。所选择的方法来自Ruscheweyh的相关长度模型和Vickery & Basu的光谱数学模型,这些方法在欧洲规范、加拿大国家建筑规范和CICIND钢烟囱模型规范等规范和标准中都有披露。此外,还将这些方法与巴西风规范的三种建议进行了比较。本研究得出结论,基于Vickery和Basu模型的方法对大位移幅值效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Probabilistic Assessment of the Seismic Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) at seven Colombian Cities Estabilidade e Resistência de Colunas em Perfis U Pultrudados Reforçados com Fibra de Vidro sob Falha Global ESTUDO DE CASO DA PONTE EM ESTRUTURA MISTA SOBRE O RIO ARATAÚ NA BR 230/PA Análise experimental e numérica de deformações e vibrações livres em estrutura metálica com telhas PET Investigação experimental física da influência de entalhes na resistência ao cisalhamento de vigas de madeira
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1