Evaluation of the influence of the type of orthodontic bracket on the perception of age

Ana Carolina Damasceno Balbino, M. Pithon, Emanuel Braga
{"title":"Evaluation of the influence of the type of orthodontic bracket on the perception of age","authors":"Ana Carolina Damasceno Balbino, M. Pithon, Emanuel Braga","doi":"10.19177/jrd.v6e2201829-34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The demand for orthodontic treatment has increased considerably among adult patients. Factors that contribute to this scenario are the use of new technologies, development of new materials and access to information. However, a large number of adults still do not adhere to treatment due to poor aesthetic appearance of brackets. Objective: To assess the influence of the use of metallic or aesthetic brackets on the perception of age. Methods: A 45-year-old female was photographed smiling and the image was manipulated in an editing program in order to generate a smile without brackets or with metallic or aesthetic brackets. A photographic album was assembled in addition to a questionnaire in which the interviewees answered questions about the age of the individual in the three situations. Results: The proportion of respondents who assigned age > 40 years (actual age) was higher in the group that evaluated the image without the orthodontic appliance. The frequency of respondents who indicated ages < 30 and between 30 and 40 years was higher in the groups that evaluated the images with aesthetic and metallic brackets, respectively. The appearance < 30 years of age was positively associated with the use of aesthetic and metallic brackets. The appearance of 30 to 40 years was positively associated with the use of metallic, but not with the use of aesthetic brackets. Conclusions: It was possible to infer that, according to the participants of this study, the use of orthodontic appliance made the individual look younger. There was no significant difference between aesthetic and metallic appliances in contributing to a more youthful appearance corresponding to age < 30 years. The appearance of 30 to 40 years of age was positively associated with the use of metallic brackets, but not with the use of aesthetic brackets.","PeriodicalId":213881,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Dentistry","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19177/jrd.v6e2201829-34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The demand for orthodontic treatment has increased considerably among adult patients. Factors that contribute to this scenario are the use of new technologies, development of new materials and access to information. However, a large number of adults still do not adhere to treatment due to poor aesthetic appearance of brackets. Objective: To assess the influence of the use of metallic or aesthetic brackets on the perception of age. Methods: A 45-year-old female was photographed smiling and the image was manipulated in an editing program in order to generate a smile without brackets or with metallic or aesthetic brackets. A photographic album was assembled in addition to a questionnaire in which the interviewees answered questions about the age of the individual in the three situations. Results: The proportion of respondents who assigned age > 40 years (actual age) was higher in the group that evaluated the image without the orthodontic appliance. The frequency of respondents who indicated ages < 30 and between 30 and 40 years was higher in the groups that evaluated the images with aesthetic and metallic brackets, respectively. The appearance < 30 years of age was positively associated with the use of aesthetic and metallic brackets. The appearance of 30 to 40 years was positively associated with the use of metallic, but not with the use of aesthetic brackets. Conclusions: It was possible to infer that, according to the participants of this study, the use of orthodontic appliance made the individual look younger. There was no significant difference between aesthetic and metallic appliances in contributing to a more youthful appearance corresponding to age < 30 years. The appearance of 30 to 40 years of age was positively associated with the use of metallic brackets, but not with the use of aesthetic brackets.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正畸托槽类型对年龄感知影响的评价
背景:成人患者对正畸治疗的需求显著增加。促成这种情况的因素是新技术的使用、新材料的开发和信息的获取。然而,由于托槽外观美观性差,仍有大量成年人不坚持治疗。目的:评价金属托槽与美学托槽的使用对年龄感知的影响。方法:对一名45岁的女性进行微笑拍摄,并在编辑程序中对图像进行处理,以产生无托架或金属托架或美学托架的微笑。除了一份调查问卷外,还收集了一本摄影集,在问卷中,受访者回答了关于三种情况下个人年龄的问题。结果:年龄> 40岁(实际年龄)的受访者比例高于不使用正畸矫治器评估图像组。年龄在30岁以下和30岁至40岁之间的受访者分别在使用美学和金属支架评估图像的组中较高。外观< 30岁的患者与美学和金属托槽的使用呈正相关。30 ~ 40年的外观与金属的使用呈正相关,但与美学支架的使用无关。结论:可以推断,根据本研究的参与者,正畸矫治器的使用使个体看起来更年轻。在年龄< 30岁的患者中,美学矫治器与金属矫治器在使其外观更年轻方面没有显著差异。30 ~ 40岁的外观与金属托槽的使用呈正相关,而与美学托槽的使用无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EVALUATION OF INTRAOPERATIVE PAIN OCCURRENCE AND NEED FOR SUPPLEMENTAL ANESTHESIA DURING EMERGENCY DENTAL CARE Quality analysis of four filling techniques in ovoid root canals prepared with M® instruments SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF MOLAR INCISOR HYPOMINERALIZATION (MIH) OPACITIES IN FIRST PERMANENT MOLARS Topographic analysis of fiber posts after surface disinfection with different methods Treatment of lingual nerve paresthesia through photobiomodulation therapy: a case report employing an approach integrating extraoral and intraoral modalities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1