An Investigation into the Relationship between Training Evaluation and the Transfer of Training

A. Saks, L. Burke
{"title":"An Investigation into the Relationship between Training Evaluation and the Transfer of Training","authors":"A. Saks, L. Burke","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2419.2011.00397.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between training evaluation and the transfer of training in organizations. We hypothesized that training evaluation frequency will be related to higher rates of transfer because evaluation information can identify weaknesses that lead to improvements in training programs and create greater accountability among stakeholders for training outcomes. The data were obtained from 150 training professionals who were members of a training and development association in Canada. The results indicated that training evaluation frequency is positively related to training transfer. However, among Kirkpatrick's four levels of evaluation criteria, only behavior and results criteria were related to higher rates of transfer of training, indicating that the level of evaluation criteria is important for training transfer. These results indicate the importance of organizational-level initiatives such as training evaluation in addition to individual-level practices for facilitating the transfer of training.","PeriodicalId":371085,"journal":{"name":"CSN: Pedagogy (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"165","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CSN: Pedagogy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2419.2011.00397.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 165

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between training evaluation and the transfer of training in organizations. We hypothesized that training evaluation frequency will be related to higher rates of transfer because evaluation information can identify weaknesses that lead to improvements in training programs and create greater accountability among stakeholders for training outcomes. The data were obtained from 150 training professionals who were members of a training and development association in Canada. The results indicated that training evaluation frequency is positively related to training transfer. However, among Kirkpatrick's four levels of evaluation criteria, only behavior and results criteria were related to higher rates of transfer of training, indicating that the level of evaluation criteria is important for training transfer. These results indicate the importance of organizational-level initiatives such as training evaluation in addition to individual-level practices for facilitating the transfer of training.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
培训评价与培训转移关系研究
摘要本研究旨在探讨培训评估与组织内培训转移的关系。我们假设培训评估频率将与更高的转移率相关,因为评估信息可以识别导致培训计划改进的弱点,并在利益相关者之间建立更大的培训结果问责制。这些数据是从加拿大一个培训和发展协会的150名培训专业人员那里获得的。结果表明,培训评估频率与培训迁移呈正相关。然而,在Kirkpatrick提出的四个等级的评价标准中,只有行为标准和结果标准与较高的训练迁移率相关,说明评价标准的等级对训练迁移很重要。这些结果表明,除了个人层面的实践之外,组织层面的举措(如培训评估)对于促进培训的转移也很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Students’ Motivation in the Training Process and its Relation to the Rewards from Superiors for Getting Better Performance Understanding the Effects of Middle School Algebra: A Regression Discontinuity Approach Analysis of the Ability in Mathematical Problem-Solving Based on SOLO Taxonomy and Cognitive Style Social Adjustment and Job Performance of College Teachers: An Analytical Study Team Creativity: The Effects of Perceived Learning Culture, Developmental Feedback and Team Cohesion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1