Does Market Volatility Affects Hedge Effectiveness? An Empirical Investigation of Time-Invariant and Time-Varying Hedges During Period of Financial Crisis in Indian Futures Market

S. N. Nageswara Rao, S. K. Thakur
{"title":"Does Market Volatility Affects Hedge Effectiveness? An Empirical Investigation of Time-Invariant and Time-Varying Hedges During Period of Financial Crisis in Indian Futures Market","authors":"S. N. Nageswara Rao, S. K. Thakur","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1663373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Financial derivatives are extensively used as hedging instruments worldwide, including emerging markets like Malaysian, Italian, and Portuguese equity markets. However, hedging one’s stock position through futures is still the road less traveled in India. This study is, therefore, an attempt to explore Indian futures market for hedging by equity holders in general as well as in period of financial crisis. We have estimated effectiveness of the optimal hedge ratio based on HKM [Herbst, Kare and Marshall (1993)] methodology with benchmark model JSE [Johnson (1960), Stein (1961) and Ederington (1979)] methodology for futures. Hedge ratio based on HKM methodology is a time-variant whereas hedge ratio based on JSE methodology is a constant and time-invariant. To bring the comparison of hedge effectiveness on equal level (from transaction cost point of view), time-varying hedge ratio estimated based on HKM methodology “time-invariant” and then Bases using the hedge ratios are estimated. For empirical validation of the Effectiveness of the optimal hedge ratios and their stability in normal as well in the period of financial crisis, the study of S&P Nifty Index {National Stock Exchange of India (NSE) – 50 Index and its futures is conducted using daily data for the year 2005 (representing normal period) and January 2007 to June 2009 (representing turbulent time period) based on the value of volatility index. Results suggest that hedge using HKM model is more effective than that of hedge based on JSE model. The results are statistically significant at 95% confidence level. An additional contribution of this study is to help the hedger to decide “when” to re-balance the hedge.","PeriodicalId":188920,"journal":{"name":"INTL: Managing in Emerging Markets (Topic)","volume":"273 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTL: Managing in Emerging Markets (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1663373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Financial derivatives are extensively used as hedging instruments worldwide, including emerging markets like Malaysian, Italian, and Portuguese equity markets. However, hedging one’s stock position through futures is still the road less traveled in India. This study is, therefore, an attempt to explore Indian futures market for hedging by equity holders in general as well as in period of financial crisis. We have estimated effectiveness of the optimal hedge ratio based on HKM [Herbst, Kare and Marshall (1993)] methodology with benchmark model JSE [Johnson (1960), Stein (1961) and Ederington (1979)] methodology for futures. Hedge ratio based on HKM methodology is a time-variant whereas hedge ratio based on JSE methodology is a constant and time-invariant. To bring the comparison of hedge effectiveness on equal level (from transaction cost point of view), time-varying hedge ratio estimated based on HKM methodology “time-invariant” and then Bases using the hedge ratios are estimated. For empirical validation of the Effectiveness of the optimal hedge ratios and their stability in normal as well in the period of financial crisis, the study of S&P Nifty Index {National Stock Exchange of India (NSE) – 50 Index and its futures is conducted using daily data for the year 2005 (representing normal period) and January 2007 to June 2009 (representing turbulent time period) based on the value of volatility index. Results suggest that hedge using HKM model is more effective than that of hedge based on JSE model. The results are statistically significant at 95% confidence level. An additional contribution of this study is to help the hedger to decide “when” to re-balance the hedge.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
市场波动是否影响套期保值效果?金融危机时期印度期货市场定常与时变套期保值的实证研究
金融衍生品在全球范围内被广泛用作对冲工具,包括马来西亚、意大利和葡萄牙等新兴市场的股票市场。然而,在印度,通过期货对冲股票头寸仍然是一条罕有的道路。因此,本研究试图探索印度期货市场在一般情况下以及在金融危机时期对股票持有人进行套期保值。我们基于HKM [Herbst, Kare和Marshall(1993)]方法和JSE [Johnson (1960), Stein(1961)和Ederington(1979)]期货基准模型估算了最优对冲比率的有效性。基于HKM方法的套期保值比率是时变的,而基于JSE方法的套期保值比率是恒定的、定常的。为了在同等水平上(从交易成本的角度)对对冲有效性进行比较,基于HKM方法“时不变”估计时变对冲比率,然后使用对冲比率估计基数。为了实证验证最优对冲比率的有效性及其在正常和金融危机时期的稳定性,本文使用2005年(代表正常时期)和2007年1月至2009年6月(代表动荡时期)的波动指数值,对标准普尔Nifty指数{印度国家证券交易所(NSE) - 50指数及其期货进行了研究。结果表明,基于HKM模型的套期保值比基于JSE模型的套期保值更有效。结果在95%的置信水平上具有统计学意义。本研究的另一个贡献是帮助套期保值者决定“何时”重新平衡套期保值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Home Country Investor Protection, Ownership Structure and Cross-listed Firms’ Compliance with SOX-mandated Internal Control Deficiency Disclosures Quantifying the ECB’s Interest Rate Smoothing Behavior Currency Risk Exposure of Chinese Corporations Immigration Policies and the Ecuadorian Exodus A Tale of Two Market Microstructures: Spillovers of Informed Trading and Liquidity for Cross Listed Chinese A and B Shares
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1