Contesting the Admissibility of the Action at First Instance

Caroline Naômé
{"title":"Contesting the Admissibility of the Action at First Instance","authors":"Caroline Naômé","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198826255.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter describes how the Court of Justice (ECJ) has dealt with appeals in which the appellants contested the admissibility of the action at first instance. The difficulty was that the appellants did not always have a legal interest in bringing proceedings. The summary of the case-law differentiates between particular situations: where the General Court had rejected the preliminary plea of inadmissibility, where it had joined that plea to the substance and where the inadmissibility had not been challenged before the General Court. A number of rules specific to that question were added in the 2012 recast of the Rules of Procedure.","PeriodicalId":433818,"journal":{"name":"Appeals Before the Court of Justice of the European Union","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appeals Before the Court of Justice of the European Union","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198826255.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter describes how the Court of Justice (ECJ) has dealt with appeals in which the appellants contested the admissibility of the action at first instance. The difficulty was that the appellants did not always have a legal interest in bringing proceedings. The summary of the case-law differentiates between particular situations: where the General Court had rejected the preliminary plea of inadmissibility, where it had joined that plea to the substance and where the inadmissibility had not been challenged before the General Court. A number of rules specific to that question were added in the 2012 recast of the Rules of Procedure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初审诉讼可采性之争
本章描述了欧洲法院如何处理上诉人在一审中对诉讼的可受理性提出异议的上诉。困难在于上诉人并不总是对提起诉讼有法律利益。判例法摘要区分了以下几种特殊情况:普通法院驳回了关于不可受理的初步抗辩,普通法院将该抗辩与实质内容结合在一起,以及普通法院没有对不可受理提出质疑。2012年修订的《议事规则》中增加了一些具体针对该问题的规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Appraisal of the Current Situation and Future Prospects Review Confined to Points of Law The Procedure before the Court of Justice The Parties to Appeal Proceedings Cross-appeals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1