Comparison between the Results of Internal Fixation Using Proximal Femur Nail Anti-rotation and Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty in Treatment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures of Elderly Patients

S. Kim, Soo-Won Lee, G. Kong, Mid-Um JeaGal
{"title":"Comparison between the Results of Internal Fixation Using Proximal Femur Nail Anti-rotation and Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty in Treatment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures of Elderly Patients","authors":"S. Kim, Soo-Won Lee, G. Kong, Mid-Um JeaGal","doi":"10.5371/JKHS.2012.24.1.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Results: The volume of blood loss during the operation was statistically lesser in the PFNA group (P<0.05) and operation time was not statistically different between the two groups (p=0.73). The bipolar hemiarthroplasty group showed a statistically better outcome than the PFNA group in the beginning of weight bearing (p<0.05), the hospital stay (p<0.05). The degradations of Koval score and modified Harris hip score of the bipolar hemiarthroplasty group were statistically better than those of the PFNA group (p=0.03, p=0.02). The bipolar hemiarthroplasty group showed a statistically lower incidence of mechanical(9.1%, p=0.01) and general(12.1%, p=0.00) complications than the PFNA group. Conclusion: In elderly patients, bipolar hemiarthroplasty is thought to be one of the effective treatments for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fracutures when considering complications and clinical outcomes.","PeriodicalId":410202,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Korean Hip Society","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Korean Hip Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5371/JKHS.2012.24.1.45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Results: The volume of blood loss during the operation was statistically lesser in the PFNA group (P<0.05) and operation time was not statistically different between the two groups (p=0.73). The bipolar hemiarthroplasty group showed a statistically better outcome than the PFNA group in the beginning of weight bearing (p<0.05), the hospital stay (p<0.05). The degradations of Koval score and modified Harris hip score of the bipolar hemiarthroplasty group were statistically better than those of the PFNA group (p=0.03, p=0.02). The bipolar hemiarthroplasty group showed a statistically lower incidence of mechanical(9.1%, p=0.01) and general(12.1%, p=0.00) complications than the PFNA group. Conclusion: In elderly patients, bipolar hemiarthroplasty is thought to be one of the effective treatments for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fracutures when considering complications and clinical outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
股骨近端防旋转内固定与双极半关节置换术治疗老年不稳定股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效比较
结果:PFNA组术中出血量明显少于PFNA组(P<0.05),两组手术时间差异无统计学意义(P =0.73)。双极半关节置换术组在开始负重(p<0.05)、住院时间(p<0.05)均优于PFNA组。双极半关节置换术组的Koval评分和改良Harris髋关节评分的下降均优于PFNA组(p=0.03, p=0.02)。双极半关节置换术组机械性并发症发生率(9.1%,p=0.01)和一般性并发症发生率(12.1%,p=0.00)均低于PFNA组。结论:在老年患者中,考虑到并发症和临床结果,双极半关节置换术被认为是治疗不稳定股骨粗隆间骨折的有效方法之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Aim of Medicine Comparative Analysis of Two Cementless Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasties in Patients with Osteonecrosis of Femoral Head - Summit® Stem and Bencox® Stem - Repeated Ceramic Head Fracture after Ceramic-on-ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty in Dysplastic Hips Hip Arthroplasty Using Collarless Polished Tapered Stem -Minimum 2 Years Follow-up Results-
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1