The Roots and Fruits of Good Faith in Domestic Court Practice

Thomas Neumann
{"title":"The Roots and Fruits of Good Faith in Domestic Court Practice","authors":"Thomas Neumann","doi":"10.58948/2331-3536.1380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Good faith—most lawyers have an opinion on these two words. While the notion of good faith may play specific roles at domestic and regional levels, it remains an elusive siren at the international level. The concept was subject to controversy at the birth of the 1980 United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) and has been debated by scholars ever since. Considering that the Convention has now been in force for over thirty years, it is agreed that time is ripe for “a call to arms for further research into a uniform standard of good faith. This Article contributes to such further research as it unravels the life of good faith in court practice on a scale never before seen. *PhD, Master of Laws. Associate Professor at Aalborg University. Founder and editor of the CISGNordic.net research database. orcid.org/00000002-0477-7429. The research underlying this Article was sponsored by the Danish Council for Independent Research. This Article is the second in a series of Articles mapping the application practice of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG). For the first Article, see Thomas Neumann, Is the Albert Kritzer Database Telling Us More Than We Know?, 27 PACE INT'L L. REV. 119 (2015).","PeriodicalId":340850,"journal":{"name":"Pace International Law Review","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pace International Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58948/2331-3536.1380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Good faith—most lawyers have an opinion on these two words. While the notion of good faith may play specific roles at domestic and regional levels, it remains an elusive siren at the international level. The concept was subject to controversy at the birth of the 1980 United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) and has been debated by scholars ever since. Considering that the Convention has now been in force for over thirty years, it is agreed that time is ripe for “a call to arms for further research into a uniform standard of good faith. This Article contributes to such further research as it unravels the life of good faith in court practice on a scale never before seen. *PhD, Master of Laws. Associate Professor at Aalborg University. Founder and editor of the CISGNordic.net research database. orcid.org/00000002-0477-7429. The research underlying this Article was sponsored by the Danish Council for Independent Research. This Article is the second in a series of Articles mapping the application practice of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG). For the first Article, see Thomas Neumann, Is the Albert Kritzer Database Telling Us More Than We Know?, 27 PACE INT'L L. REV. 119 (2015).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国内法院实践中诚信的根与果
诚信——大多数律师对这两个词都有自己的看法。虽然诚信的概念可能在国内和区域一级发挥具体作用,但在国际一级它仍然是一个难以捉摸的警笛。这一概念在1980年《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》(CISG)诞生时就受到争议,此后学者们一直在争论。考虑到《公约》现已生效三十多年,大家一致认为,“呼吁进一步研究统一的诚信标准”的时机已经成熟。这篇文章有助于进一步的研究,因为它以前所未有的规模揭示了法庭实践中的诚信生活。*法学博士、硕士。奥尔堡大学副教授。CISGNordic.net研究数据库的创始人和编辑。orcid.org/00000002 - 0477 - 7429。本文背后的研究是由丹麦独立研究委员会赞助的。本文是《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》适用实践系列文章的第二篇。关于第一篇文章,请参见托马斯·诺伊曼的《阿尔伯特·克里策数据库告诉我们的比我们知道的更多吗?》,[27]《国际法学》,2015年第119期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
40 YEARS AFTER THE MORATORIUM ON COMMERCIAL WHALING: ASSESSING THE COMPETENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL WHALING COMMISSION TO CONFRONT CRITICAL THREATS TO CETACEANS INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW AND THE ROLE OF NARRATIVE IN THE WAR IN UKRAINE THE RIGHT TO HAVE RIGHTS OR THE RIGHT TO HAVE LIFE? AN ASSESSMENT OF PROACTIVE CITIZENSHIP-STRIPPING TO FULFILL THE STATE DUTY OF NON-REFOULMENT A GLOBAL PUZZLE: INTEGRATING IOT JURISPRUDENTIAL APPROACHES THEY “EYEBALLED” THE RIVER AND BUILT THE DAM: LESSONS FROM THE HIDROTAMBO DAM FLOOD DISASTER TO GUIDE IMPROVEMENTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT LAW IN ECUADOR
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1