Quantity or Quality? Collaboration Strategies in Research and Development and Incentives to Patent

Hanna Hottenrott, Cindy Lopes-Bento
{"title":"Quantity or Quality? Collaboration Strategies in Research and Development and Incentives to Patent","authors":"Hanna Hottenrott, Cindy Lopes-Bento","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2118511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using count data models controlling for unobserved heterogeneity, this study shows for a large sample of R&D-active manufacturing firms in Flanders that collaborative R&D has a positive effect on firms’ patenting in terms of both quantity and quality. However, when distinguishing between alliances that aim at joint creation of new knowledge and alliances that aim at the exchange of existing knowledge, the results suggest that the positive effect on patenting quantity is to a large extent driven by knowledge exchange alliances rather than joint R&D. Firms engaged in creation alliances, on the other hand, receive more forward citations per patent which indicates that joint R&D enhances patent quality. In the light of the literature on strategic patenting, our results may further suggest that creation alliances lead to patents that are filed to protect valuable intellectual property, while exchange alliances drive “portfolio patenting” which has been shown to result in fewer citations for the individual patent.","PeriodicalId":320323,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: Research (Sub-Topic)","volume":"129 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERPN: Research (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2118511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Using count data models controlling for unobserved heterogeneity, this study shows for a large sample of R&D-active manufacturing firms in Flanders that collaborative R&D has a positive effect on firms’ patenting in terms of both quantity and quality. However, when distinguishing between alliances that aim at joint creation of new knowledge and alliances that aim at the exchange of existing knowledge, the results suggest that the positive effect on patenting quantity is to a large extent driven by knowledge exchange alliances rather than joint R&D. Firms engaged in creation alliances, on the other hand, receive more forward citations per patent which indicates that joint R&D enhances patent quality. In the light of the literature on strategic patenting, our results may further suggest that creation alliances lead to patents that are filed to protect valuable intellectual property, while exchange alliances drive “portfolio patenting” which has been shown to result in fewer citations for the individual patent.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数量还是质量?研发合作策略与专利激励
利用计数数据模型控制未观察到的异质性,本研究表明,对于法兰德斯大量研发活跃的制造企业来说,合作研发对企业的专利申请在数量和质量方面都有积极影响。然而,在区分以共同创造新知识为目的的联盟和以现有知识交换为目的的联盟时,结果表明,知识交换联盟对专利数量的积极影响在很大程度上是由知识交换联盟而不是联合研发驱动的。另一方面,从事创新联盟的企业每项专利获得更多的前向引用,这表明联合研发提高了专利质量。根据有关战略专利的文献,我们的研究结果可能进一步表明,创造联盟导致专利申请,以保护有价值的知识产权,而交换联盟推动“组合专利”,已被证明导致单个专利的引用较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Can Environmental Policy Encourage Technical Change? Emissions Taxes and R&D Investment in Polluting Firms Three Decades of Research on Corporate Governance and R&D Investments: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda The Risk of Caution: Evidence from an R&D Experiment Bilateral R&D Productivity and Supply Chain Networks Notching R&D Investment with Corporate Income Tax Cuts in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1