The effect of chair type on users' viewing experience for 360-degree video

Yang Hong, Andrew MacQuarrie, A. Steed
{"title":"The effect of chair type on users' viewing experience for 360-degree video","authors":"Yang Hong, Andrew MacQuarrie, A. Steed","doi":"10.1145/3281505.3281519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The consumption of 360-degree videos with head-mounted displays (HMDs) is increasing rapidly. A large number of HMD users watch 360-degree videos at home, often on non-swivel seats; however videos are frequently designed to require the user to turn around. This work explores how the difference in users' chair type might influence their viewing experience. A between-subject experiment was conducted with 41 participants. Three chair conditions were used: fixed, half-swivel and full-swivel. A variety of measures were explored using eye-tracking, questionnaires, tasks and semi-structured interviews. Results suggest that the fixed and half-swivel chairs discouraged exploration for certain videos compared with the full-swivel chair. Additionally, participants in the fixed chair had worse spatial awareness and greater concern about missing something for certain video than those in the full-swivel chair. No significant differences were found in terms of incidental memory, general engagement and simulator sickness among the three chair conditions. Furthermore, thematic analysis of post-experiment interviews revealed four themes regarding the restrictive chairs: physical discomfort, difficulty following moving objects, reduced orientation and guided attention. Based on the findings, practical implications, limitations and future work are discussed.","PeriodicalId":138249,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 24th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 24th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3281505.3281519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The consumption of 360-degree videos with head-mounted displays (HMDs) is increasing rapidly. A large number of HMD users watch 360-degree videos at home, often on non-swivel seats; however videos are frequently designed to require the user to turn around. This work explores how the difference in users' chair type might influence their viewing experience. A between-subject experiment was conducted with 41 participants. Three chair conditions were used: fixed, half-swivel and full-swivel. A variety of measures were explored using eye-tracking, questionnaires, tasks and semi-structured interviews. Results suggest that the fixed and half-swivel chairs discouraged exploration for certain videos compared with the full-swivel chair. Additionally, participants in the fixed chair had worse spatial awareness and greater concern about missing something for certain video than those in the full-swivel chair. No significant differences were found in terms of incidental memory, general engagement and simulator sickness among the three chair conditions. Furthermore, thematic analysis of post-experiment interviews revealed four themes regarding the restrictive chairs: physical discomfort, difficulty following moving objects, reduced orientation and guided attention. Based on the findings, practical implications, limitations and future work are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
椅子类型对用户360度视频观看体验的影响
使用头戴式显示器(hmd)观看360度视频的消费正在迅速增长。大量HMD用户在家观看360度视频,通常是在非旋转座椅上;然而,视频经常被设计成需要用户转身。这项工作探讨了用户椅子类型的差异如何影响他们的观看体验。研究人员对41名参与者进行了受试者间实验。使用了三种椅子状态:固定、半旋转和全旋转。通过眼动追踪、问卷调查、任务和半结构化访谈,研究了各种测量方法。结果表明,与全转椅相比,固定和半转椅阻碍了对某些视频的探索。此外,与坐在全转椅上的参与者相比,坐在固定椅子上的参与者空间意识更差,更担心错过某些视频。在三种椅子条件下,在附带记忆,一般参与和模拟器疾病方面没有发现显着差异。此外,实验后访谈的主题分析揭示了限制性椅子的四个主题:身体不适、跟随移动物体困难、定向降低和引导注意力。根据研究结果,讨论了实际意义、局限性和未来的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
XRCreator Indoor AR navigation using tilesets "Virtual ability simulation" to boost rehabilitation exercise performance and confidence for people with disability BoatAR An evaluation of smartphone-based interaction in AR for constrained object manipulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1