Comparison of pit and fissure sealant utilization by pediatric and general dentists in Colorado.

The Journal of pedodontics Pub Date : 1990-01-01
M J Hicks, C M Flaitz, R L Call
{"title":"Comparison of pit and fissure sealant utilization by pediatric and general dentists in Colorado.","authors":"M J Hicks,&nbsp;C M Flaitz,&nbsp;R L Call","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to conduct a survey of Colorado pediatric and general dentists concerning attitudes toward and use of sealants. The survey results indicated that sealants were used in the following manner by pediatric vs. general dentists, respectively: 1) Routinely 73.4% vs. 40.1%; 2) Occasionally 15.6% vs. 32.6%; 3) Seldom 6.6% vs. 10.0%; 4) Do Not Use 4.4% vs. 17.3%. Reasons for limited or non-utilization of sealants by both groups included: 1) Not covered by insurance; 2) Inadvertent sealing in caries; 3) Do not last; 4) Not cost effective. Delegation of primary responsibility for sealant placement differed as follows between pediatric and general dentists, respectively: 1) Dentist 73.3% vs. 64.8%; 2) Hygienist 0% vs. 17.8%; 3) Assistant 26.7% vs. 17.4%. Continuing education courses on sealants had been attended by 62% of pediatric dentists and 16.9% of their auxiliaries and by 29.1% of general dentists and 6.3% of their auxiliaries. Approximately 50% of pediatric and general dentists expressed an interest in attending sealant courses. This study indicates that: 1) Colorado dentists report a relatively high sealant utilization rate. 2) Pediatric dentists place sealants more frequently than general dentists. 3) The most frequent reason for restricting sealant placement was lack of insurance coverage. 4) A need for continuing education of dentists and auxiliaries exists.</p>","PeriodicalId":76658,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of pedodontics","volume":"14 2","pages":"97-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of pedodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to conduct a survey of Colorado pediatric and general dentists concerning attitudes toward and use of sealants. The survey results indicated that sealants were used in the following manner by pediatric vs. general dentists, respectively: 1) Routinely 73.4% vs. 40.1%; 2) Occasionally 15.6% vs. 32.6%; 3) Seldom 6.6% vs. 10.0%; 4) Do Not Use 4.4% vs. 17.3%. Reasons for limited or non-utilization of sealants by both groups included: 1) Not covered by insurance; 2) Inadvertent sealing in caries; 3) Do not last; 4) Not cost effective. Delegation of primary responsibility for sealant placement differed as follows between pediatric and general dentists, respectively: 1) Dentist 73.3% vs. 64.8%; 2) Hygienist 0% vs. 17.8%; 3) Assistant 26.7% vs. 17.4%. Continuing education courses on sealants had been attended by 62% of pediatric dentists and 16.9% of their auxiliaries and by 29.1% of general dentists and 6.3% of their auxiliaries. Approximately 50% of pediatric and general dentists expressed an interest in attending sealant courses. This study indicates that: 1) Colorado dentists report a relatively high sealant utilization rate. 2) Pediatric dentists place sealants more frequently than general dentists. 3) The most frequent reason for restricting sealant placement was lack of insurance coverage. 4) A need for continuing education of dentists and auxiliaries exists.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科罗拉多州儿科和普通牙医使用牙窝和牙缝密封剂的比较。
本研究的目的是对科罗拉多州儿科和普通牙医对密封剂的态度和使用进行调查。调查结果显示,儿科牙医和普通牙医使用密封胶的方式分别为:1)常规使用73.4%对40.1%;2)偶尔15.6% vs. 32.6%;3)很少6.6% vs. 10.0%;4)不要使用4.4% vs. 17.3%。两组限制或不使用密封剂的原因包括:1)未在保险范围内;2)龋齿不小心密封;3)不持久;4)成本效益不高。儿科牙医和普通牙医对密封胶放置的主要责任下放的差异如下:1)牙医73.3% vs. 64.8%;2)卫生员0%对17.8%;3)助理26.7% vs. 17.4%。62%的儿科牙医及其16.9%的助理牙医、29.1%的普通科牙医及其6.3%的助理牙医曾修读有关密封剂的持续教育课程。大约50%的儿科和普通牙医表示有兴趣参加密封胶课程。本研究表明:1)科罗拉多州牙医报告了相对较高的密封剂使用率。2)儿科牙医比普通牙医更频繁地使用密封剂。3)限制密封胶放置的最常见原因是缺乏保险保障。牙医及其辅助人员需要继续接受教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Survey of pediatrician's attitudes towards pediatric dental health. Relation of salivary phosphorus and alkaline phosphatase to the incidence of dental caries in children. Ethnic variations of sweet preferences in Malaysian children: a pilot study. Gingival pigmentation in preschool children of Chengdu, West China. Dental knowledge, attitudes and behavior among Kuwaiti mothers and school teachers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1