Do NMDA antagonists protect against cerebral ischemia: are clinical trials warranted?

A M Buchan
{"title":"Do NMDA antagonists protect against cerebral ischemia: are clinical trials warranted?","authors":"A M Buchan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An accumulation of experimental data suggests that N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists will prevent ischemic neuronal injury following transient global ischemia and reduce infarct volumes following focal ischemic insults. The excitotoxic hypothesis states that the excitatory amino acid neurotransmitter L-glutamate has neurotoxic properties that can be attenuated by antagonism of the NMDA receptor. In vitro work has shown that a variety of NMDA antagonists will prevent the death of neurons grown in culture and subsequently exposed to either brief periods of hypoxia or glutamate exposure. In vivo it has been shown that glutamate is released following ischemia, that the NMDA receptors remain functional both during and following ischemia, and that the concentration of NMDA receptors is highest in those regions that are most sensitive to ischemic neuronal injury. Once stimulated, these receptors mediate a lethal influx of calcium. Experiments with global ischemia have reported a cytoprotective effect by either prior removal of glutamate afferents or pretreatment with either competitive or noncompetitive receptor antagonists. Some of these data have been challenged and one suggestion that has been made is that the observed pharmacoprotection may be the result of coincidental drug-induced hypothermia. Numerous studies using a variety of models of focal ischemia have shown that the volume of a cortical infarct can be reduced with NMDA antagonists given either before or after an ischemic insult. These data are more consistent than those achieved for models of global ischemia and have led to proposals for clinical trials. Novel compounds that antagonize the NMDA receptor are now the subject of phase I clinical studies that are envisaged as a prelude to randomized acute stroke trials. The hypothesis that blockade of excitatory amino acid receptors will prevent neuronal death presages a new era in acute stroke treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9739,"journal":{"name":"Cerebrovascular and brain metabolism reviews","volume":"2 1","pages":"1-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebrovascular and brain metabolism reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An accumulation of experimental data suggests that N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists will prevent ischemic neuronal injury following transient global ischemia and reduce infarct volumes following focal ischemic insults. The excitotoxic hypothesis states that the excitatory amino acid neurotransmitter L-glutamate has neurotoxic properties that can be attenuated by antagonism of the NMDA receptor. In vitro work has shown that a variety of NMDA antagonists will prevent the death of neurons grown in culture and subsequently exposed to either brief periods of hypoxia or glutamate exposure. In vivo it has been shown that glutamate is released following ischemia, that the NMDA receptors remain functional both during and following ischemia, and that the concentration of NMDA receptors is highest in those regions that are most sensitive to ischemic neuronal injury. Once stimulated, these receptors mediate a lethal influx of calcium. Experiments with global ischemia have reported a cytoprotective effect by either prior removal of glutamate afferents or pretreatment with either competitive or noncompetitive receptor antagonists. Some of these data have been challenged and one suggestion that has been made is that the observed pharmacoprotection may be the result of coincidental drug-induced hypothermia. Numerous studies using a variety of models of focal ischemia have shown that the volume of a cortical infarct can be reduced with NMDA antagonists given either before or after an ischemic insult. These data are more consistent than those achieved for models of global ischemia and have led to proposals for clinical trials. Novel compounds that antagonize the NMDA receptor are now the subject of phase I clinical studies that are envisaged as a prelude to randomized acute stroke trials. The hypothesis that blockade of excitatory amino acid receptors will prevent neuronal death presages a new era in acute stroke treatment.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
NMDA拮抗剂是否可以预防脑缺血:临床试验是否有必要?
越来越多的实验数据表明,n -甲基- d -天冬氨酸(NMDA)受体拮抗剂可以预防短暂性全脑缺血后的缺血性神经元损伤,并减少局灶性缺血损伤后的梗死体积。兴奋毒性假说认为,兴奋性氨基酸神经递质l -谷氨酸具有神经毒性,可通过NMDA受体的拮抗而减弱。体外研究表明,多种NMDA拮抗剂可防止培养后暴露于短时间缺氧或谷氨酸暴露的神经元死亡。在体内研究表明,谷氨酸在缺血后释放,NMDA受体在缺血期间和缺血后都保持功能,NMDA受体浓度在对缺血性神经元损伤最敏感的区域最高。一旦受到刺激,这些受体就会介导致命的钙流入。全脑缺血的实验已经报道了通过事先去除谷氨酸传入或用竞争性或非竞争性受体拮抗剂预处理的细胞保护作用。其中一些数据受到了质疑,有一种观点认为,观察到的药物保护可能是药物引起的低温巧合的结果。使用多种局灶性缺血模型的大量研究表明,在缺血损伤之前或之后给予NMDA拮抗剂可以减少皮质梗死的体积。这些数据比在全脑缺血模型中获得的数据更加一致,并导致了临床试验的建议。抗NMDA受体的新型化合物目前正在进行I期临床研究,预计将作为随机急性卒中试验的前奏。阻断兴奋性氨基酸受体可防止神经元死亡的假说预示着急性脑卒中治疗的新时代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Brain damage due to cerebral hypoxia/ischemia in the neonate: pathology and pharmacological modification. The stress gene response in brain. Periinfarct depolarizations. Perfluorochemical oxygen carriers: potential uses in neurosciences. Cortical thermal clearance as a predictor of imminent neurological deterioration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1