An overview of the efficacy of etodolac in arthritic disorders.

P A Bacon
{"title":"An overview of the efficacy of etodolac in arthritic disorders.","authors":"P A Bacon","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Etodolac is a new nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) with potent analgesic and antiarthritic properties. The purpose of these randomized, double-blind, parallel-group studies was to compare etodolac with other standard NSAIDs or placebo for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis. Results of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis studies showed etodolac (200 to 300 mg b.i.d. or 200 mg t.i.d.) to be comparable to naproxen (500 mg b.i.d.), piroxicam (20 mg once daily), and diclofenac (50 mg t.i.d.). Key efficacy variables improved significantly (p less than or equal to 0.05) in all treatment groups, and there were no significant between-group differences. Studies comparing etodolac (200 mg b.i.d.) with indomethacin (50 mg t.i.d.) for treatment of ankylosing spondylitis showed significant improvement from baseline in both the patient's and physician's global assessments for both treatments. Titrated-dose studies compared etodolac (50 to 200 mg b.i.d.) with naproxen (250 to 375 mg b.i.d.) and placebo for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis. Both active drugs resulted in greater improvement than did placebo in the patient's and investigator's global assessments. These results indicate that etodolac is as effective as naproxen, piroxicam, and diclofenac for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Moreover, it is comparable to naproxen and indomethacin and superior to placebo for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12056,"journal":{"name":"European journal of rheumatology and inflammation","volume":"10 1","pages":"22-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of rheumatology and inflammation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Etodolac is a new nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) with potent analgesic and antiarthritic properties. The purpose of these randomized, double-blind, parallel-group studies was to compare etodolac with other standard NSAIDs or placebo for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis. Results of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis studies showed etodolac (200 to 300 mg b.i.d. or 200 mg t.i.d.) to be comparable to naproxen (500 mg b.i.d.), piroxicam (20 mg once daily), and diclofenac (50 mg t.i.d.). Key efficacy variables improved significantly (p less than or equal to 0.05) in all treatment groups, and there were no significant between-group differences. Studies comparing etodolac (200 mg b.i.d.) with indomethacin (50 mg t.i.d.) for treatment of ankylosing spondylitis showed significant improvement from baseline in both the patient's and physician's global assessments for both treatments. Titrated-dose studies compared etodolac (50 to 200 mg b.i.d.) with naproxen (250 to 375 mg b.i.d.) and placebo for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis. Both active drugs resulted in greater improvement than did placebo in the patient's and investigator's global assessments. These results indicate that etodolac is as effective as naproxen, piroxicam, and diclofenac for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Moreover, it is comparable to naproxen and indomethacin and superior to placebo for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乙妥酸治疗关节炎的疗效综述。
依托度酸是一种新型的非甾体抗炎药,具有良好的镇痛和抗关节炎作用。这些随机、双盲、平行组研究的目的是比较依妥酸与其他标准非甾体抗炎药或安慰剂治疗类风湿关节炎、骨关节炎和强直性脊柱炎的疗效。类风湿关节炎和骨关节炎的研究结果显示,依托度酸(每日200至300毫克或每日200毫克)与萘普生(每日500毫克)、吡罗昔康(每日20毫克一次)和双氯芬酸(每日50毫克)相当。各治疗组主要疗效指标均有显著改善(p < 0.05),组间差异无统计学意义。比较依托度酸(200mg b.i.d)和吲哚美辛(50mg t.i.d)治疗强直性脊柱炎的研究显示,患者和医生对两种治疗方法的总体评估均较基线有显著改善。滴定剂量研究比较了依托度酸(50 - 200mg b.i.d)与萘普生(250 - 375 mg b.i.d)和安慰剂治疗强直性脊柱炎的疗效。在患者和研究者的总体评估中,两种活性药物都比安慰剂有更大的改善。这些结果表明,在治疗类风湿性关节炎和骨关节炎方面,依托酸与萘普生、吡罗西康和双氯芬酸一样有效。此外,它与萘普生和吲哚美辛相当,优于安慰剂治疗强直性脊柱炎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Flurbiprofen local action transcutaneous (LAT): clinical evaluation in the treatment of acute ankle sprains. NSAIDs and the gut--where are we now? Review of Arthrotec clinical data. Rheumatological audit--a general practice perspective. Arthrotec, diclofenac and ibuprofen in general practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1