How (Not) to Deploy Cryptography on the Internet

Haya Shulman
{"title":"How (Not) to Deploy Cryptography on the Internet","authors":"Haya Shulman","doi":"10.1145/3508398.3511270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The core protocols in the Internet infrastructure play a central role in delivering packets to their destination. The inter-domain routing with BGP (Border Gateway Protocol) computes the correct paths in the global Internet, and DNS (Domain Name System) looks up the destination addresses. Due to their critical function they are often attacked: the adversaries redirect victims to malicious servers or networks by making them traverse incorrect routes or reach incorrect destinations, e.g., for cyber-espionage, for spam distribution, for theft of crypto-currency, for censorship [1, 4-6]. This results in relatively stealthy attacks which cannot be immediately detected and prevented [2, 3]. By the time the attacks are detected, damage was already done. The frequent attacks along with the devastating damages that they incur, motivates the deployment of cryptographic defences to secure the Internet infrastructure. Multiple efforts are devoted to protecting the core Internet protocols with cryptographic mechanisms, BGP with RPKI and DNS with DNSSEC. Recently the deployment of these defences took off, and many networks and DNS servers in the Internet already adopted them. We review the deployed defences and show that the tradeoffs made by the operators or developers can be exploited to disable the cryptographic defences. We also provide mitigations and discuss challenges in their adoption.","PeriodicalId":102306,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3508398.3511270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The core protocols in the Internet infrastructure play a central role in delivering packets to their destination. The inter-domain routing with BGP (Border Gateway Protocol) computes the correct paths in the global Internet, and DNS (Domain Name System) looks up the destination addresses. Due to their critical function they are often attacked: the adversaries redirect victims to malicious servers or networks by making them traverse incorrect routes or reach incorrect destinations, e.g., for cyber-espionage, for spam distribution, for theft of crypto-currency, for censorship [1, 4-6]. This results in relatively stealthy attacks which cannot be immediately detected and prevented [2, 3]. By the time the attacks are detected, damage was already done. The frequent attacks along with the devastating damages that they incur, motivates the deployment of cryptographic defences to secure the Internet infrastructure. Multiple efforts are devoted to protecting the core Internet protocols with cryptographic mechanisms, BGP with RPKI and DNS with DNSSEC. Recently the deployment of these defences took off, and many networks and DNS servers in the Internet already adopted them. We review the deployed defences and show that the tradeoffs made by the operators or developers can be exploited to disable the cryptographic defences. We also provide mitigations and discuss challenges in their adoption.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何(不)在互联网上部署加密技术
Internet基础设施中的核心协议在将数据包传送到目的地方面起着核心作用。采用边界网关协议BGP (Border Gateway Protocol)的域间路由在全球互联网中计算正确的路径,由域名系统DNS (Domain Name System)查找目的地址。由于它们的关键功能,它们经常受到攻击:对手通过使受害者穿越错误的路由或到达错误的目的地,将受害者重定向到恶意服务器或网络,例如,用于网络间谍活动,用于垃圾邮件分发,用于窃取加密货币,用于审查[1,4 -6]。这导致了相对隐蔽的攻击,无法立即发现和阻止[2,3]。当攻击被发现时,损害已经造成了。频繁的攻击及其造成的毁灭性破坏促使部署加密防御来保护互联网基础设施。多方努力致力于用加密机制保护核心互联网协议,用RPKI保护BGP,用DNSSEC保护DNS。最近,这些防御措施的部署开始起飞,互联网上的许多网络和DNS服务器已经采用了它们。我们回顾了部署的防御措施,并表明运营商或开发人员所做的权衡可以被利用来禁用加密防御。我们还提供了缓解措施,并讨论了采用这些措施所面临的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Session details: Session 7: Encryption and Privacy RS-PKE: Ranked Searchable Public-Key Encryption for Cloud-Assisted Lightweight Platforms Prediction of Mobile App Privacy Preferences with User Profiles via Federated Learning Building a Commit-level Dataset of Real-world Vulnerabilities Shared Multi-Keyboard and Bilingual Datasets to Support Keystroke Dynamics Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1