The new attack on sexuality research: Morality and the politics of knowledge production

S. Epstein
{"title":"The new attack on sexuality research: Morality and the politics of knowledge production","authors":"S. Epstein","doi":"10.1525/SRSP.2006.3.1.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article describes and analyzes recent attempts to construct moral panic about publicly funded sexuality research in the United States, including pressure to eliminate funding for research on sexual topics with public health relevance. At the same time, the article relates the events to other recent cases in which conservative politicians, policy makers, and advocacy groups have sought to shape the production and dissemination of knowledge about sexuality. I argue that these controversies should be approached simultaneously as moral struggles around sexual norms and as credibility struggles around knowledge production. I examine the difficulties involved in articulating strong defenses of sexual knowledge production in response to such attacks, and I emphasize the limits inherent in the strategy of rallying around the autonomy of science and protesting the intrusion of politics into science. These problems point to important strategic dilemmas for activism and policy work related to sexuality and demand a rethinking of the grounds for public participation in scientific debate.","PeriodicalId":318573,"journal":{"name":"Sexuality Research and Social Policy Journal of NSRC","volume":"17 11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"44","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexuality Research and Social Policy Journal of NSRC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/SRSP.2006.3.1.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

Abstract

This article describes and analyzes recent attempts to construct moral panic about publicly funded sexuality research in the United States, including pressure to eliminate funding for research on sexual topics with public health relevance. At the same time, the article relates the events to other recent cases in which conservative politicians, policy makers, and advocacy groups have sought to shape the production and dissemination of knowledge about sexuality. I argue that these controversies should be approached simultaneously as moral struggles around sexual norms and as credibility struggles around knowledge production. I examine the difficulties involved in articulating strong defenses of sexual knowledge production in response to such attacks, and I emphasize the limits inherent in the strategy of rallying around the autonomy of science and protesting the intrusion of politics into science. These problems point to important strategic dilemmas for activism and policy work related to sexuality and demand a rethinking of the grounds for public participation in scientific debate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对性研究的新攻击:道德和知识生产的政治
这篇文章描述并分析了最近试图在美国建立关于公共资助的性研究的道德恐慌,包括取消与公共卫生相关的性主题研究的资助的压力。与此同时,这篇文章将这些事件与最近的其他案例联系起来,在这些案例中,保守派政治家、政策制定者和倡导团体试图塑造性知识的生产和传播。我认为,这些争议应该同时被视为围绕性规范的道德斗争和围绕知识生产的可信度斗争。我考察了在应对此类攻击时,为性知识生产提供强有力的防御所涉及的困难,并强调了围绕科学自主性团结起来、抗议政治侵入科学的策略所固有的局限性。这些问题指出了与性相关的行动主义和政策工作的重要战略困境,并要求对公众参与科学辩论的理由进行重新思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The prospect of prostate cancer: A challenge for gay men’s sexualities as they age LGBT aging and Rhetorical silence Sexual assault of older women: Risk and vulnerability by living arrangement From sexism to sexy: Challenging young adults’ ageism about older women’s sexuality To have or not to have: Advance planning by same-sex couples
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1