Questions of Competency and Performance in the Black Musical Diaspora: Toward a Stylistic Analysis of the Idea of a Black Atlantic

R. Abrahams
{"title":"Questions of Competency and Performance in the Black Musical Diaspora: Toward a Stylistic Analysis of the Idea of a Black Atlantic","authors":"R. Abrahams","doi":"10.5406/BLACMUSIRESEJ.32.2.0083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fifty-some years ago, the foundational work Afro-American Anthropology: Contemporary Perspectives was edited by Norman Whitten and John Szwed, in the lee of a controversial symposium held in several sessions at the meetings of the American Anthropological Association (AAA) in 1967. The book included contributions from nonparticipants who had entered into the lively discussion, including a masterful overview of the papers by Sidney Mintz. As the editors indicated in their preface, they sought papers that would judge the impact of Melville Herskovits's The Myth of the Negro Past (1941) on subsequent scholarship. Herskovits was portrayed as a troublemaker who carried an assimilationist point of view into his fieldwork in many African and Afro-American communities. His insistence on not neglecting African cultural patterns in studies of black communities in the New World fostered a general feeling among those on the soft Left that honor should be paid, as often as possible, to the African ancestry of any New World practice that showed signs of some sort of cultural continuity. He sent a call out to the social sciences in general, and especially to those engaged in ethnographic fieldwork of some sort, working and living in Afro-American communities. He was a faithful student of Franz Boas, who had advocated fine-grained reporting of the lifeways of non-Europeans. Herskovits was also politically committed to encourage the secular cosmopolitan ideas that had been inherited from the Enlightenment, but he did not fall into the trap of the social Darwinists, who insisted on studying a version of the civilizing process that derogated anyone without good table manners and the ability to schmooze effectively. He did not respond with enthusiasm to anthropological approaches that privileged structure and systematic practices--especially kinship systems and other forms of organized power. As a musician he both heard and felt the power of performances of drumming, dancing, and storytelling. And, like Boas, he pursued the study of language and culture in diffusion. Implicitly, he furthered the philological and morphological manner of studying cultures not only in stabilized and bounded communities, but in comparison with contiguous studies. His political position, once its implications could be understood, stressed a pluralist and assimilatonist agenda. Groups should be, to use Greg Dening's wonderful term, ethnogged--that is, studied at ground level in terms of the systematic behaviors which could be observed in daily life (Dening 2004). Under such a regime, the systematics of a culture would emerge from the ways in which power and responsibility were put into practice. Herskovits, like Boas, wanted students with open minds who would accord sympathy, even dignity, to whatever peoples each ethnographer chose to study--with the supposition that all humans lived in groups with shared values and practices. Again, like Boas, he wanted something like social and political parity for all self-designated communities. Like Boas, once more, he urged the ethnogging of Hispanic, Francophonic, Native American, and Negro communities (the term in general use in their day). His comparativist approach underscored historical continuities where they could be teased out. And most pugnaciously, he insisted on the cultural parity of blacks. When he and his wife decided to study African and Afro-American communities, in effect he created tout court the idea of the black diaspora--though as the son of a rabbi, he would not have used that word. This was one of the primary concerns of the group of ethnographers that met in 1967 at the meetings of the AAA. With no little passion, the editors of the book that emerged from that conference, Afro-American Anthropology: Contemporary Perspectives, urged those ethnographers writing on black communities to remember that each had its own customary ways, which could be reported on in such a way that comparative analyses might be carried out. …","PeriodicalId":354930,"journal":{"name":"Black Music Research Journal","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Black Music Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/BLACMUSIRESEJ.32.2.0083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Fifty-some years ago, the foundational work Afro-American Anthropology: Contemporary Perspectives was edited by Norman Whitten and John Szwed, in the lee of a controversial symposium held in several sessions at the meetings of the American Anthropological Association (AAA) in 1967. The book included contributions from nonparticipants who had entered into the lively discussion, including a masterful overview of the papers by Sidney Mintz. As the editors indicated in their preface, they sought papers that would judge the impact of Melville Herskovits's The Myth of the Negro Past (1941) on subsequent scholarship. Herskovits was portrayed as a troublemaker who carried an assimilationist point of view into his fieldwork in many African and Afro-American communities. His insistence on not neglecting African cultural patterns in studies of black communities in the New World fostered a general feeling among those on the soft Left that honor should be paid, as often as possible, to the African ancestry of any New World practice that showed signs of some sort of cultural continuity. He sent a call out to the social sciences in general, and especially to those engaged in ethnographic fieldwork of some sort, working and living in Afro-American communities. He was a faithful student of Franz Boas, who had advocated fine-grained reporting of the lifeways of non-Europeans. Herskovits was also politically committed to encourage the secular cosmopolitan ideas that had been inherited from the Enlightenment, but he did not fall into the trap of the social Darwinists, who insisted on studying a version of the civilizing process that derogated anyone without good table manners and the ability to schmooze effectively. He did not respond with enthusiasm to anthropological approaches that privileged structure and systematic practices--especially kinship systems and other forms of organized power. As a musician he both heard and felt the power of performances of drumming, dancing, and storytelling. And, like Boas, he pursued the study of language and culture in diffusion. Implicitly, he furthered the philological and morphological manner of studying cultures not only in stabilized and bounded communities, but in comparison with contiguous studies. His political position, once its implications could be understood, stressed a pluralist and assimilatonist agenda. Groups should be, to use Greg Dening's wonderful term, ethnogged--that is, studied at ground level in terms of the systematic behaviors which could be observed in daily life (Dening 2004). Under such a regime, the systematics of a culture would emerge from the ways in which power and responsibility were put into practice. Herskovits, like Boas, wanted students with open minds who would accord sympathy, even dignity, to whatever peoples each ethnographer chose to study--with the supposition that all humans lived in groups with shared values and practices. Again, like Boas, he wanted something like social and political parity for all self-designated communities. Like Boas, once more, he urged the ethnogging of Hispanic, Francophonic, Native American, and Negro communities (the term in general use in their day). His comparativist approach underscored historical continuities where they could be teased out. And most pugnaciously, he insisted on the cultural parity of blacks. When he and his wife decided to study African and Afro-American communities, in effect he created tout court the idea of the black diaspora--though as the son of a rabbi, he would not have used that word. This was one of the primary concerns of the group of ethnographers that met in 1967 at the meetings of the AAA. With no little passion, the editors of the book that emerged from that conference, Afro-American Anthropology: Contemporary Perspectives, urged those ethnographers writing on black communities to remember that each had its own customary ways, which could be reported on in such a way that comparative analyses might be carried out. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黑人音乐流散中的能力和表现问题:对黑人大西洋观念的风格分析
五十多年前,Norman Whitten和John Szwed在1967年美国人类学协会(AAA)几次会议上举行的一次有争议的研讨会上编辑了基础著作《美国黑人人类学:当代视角》。这本书包括了参与热烈讨论的非参与者的贡献,包括西德尼·明茨对论文的精湛概述。正如编辑们在前言中所指出的那样,他们寻找能够判断梅尔维尔·赫斯科维茨的《黑人过去的神话》(1941)对后来的学术影响的论文。赫斯科维茨被描绘成一个麻烦制造者,他在许多非洲人和非裔美国人社区的实地工作中带着同化主义的观点。他坚持在新大陆黑人社区的研究中不要忽视非洲文化模式,这在软左派中培养了一种普遍的感觉,即应该尽可能多地尊重新大陆任何表现出某种文化连续性迹象的实践的非洲血统。他向社会科学界发出了号召,尤其是那些在非裔美国人社区工作和生活的,从事人种学田野调查的人。他是弗朗茨·博阿斯(Franz Boas)的忠实学生,博阿斯主张对非欧洲人的生活方式进行细致的报道。赫斯科维茨在政治上也致力于鼓励继承自启蒙运动的世俗世界主义思想,但他没有落入社会达尔文主义者的陷阱,后者坚持研究一种文明过程的版本,贬低任何没有良好餐桌礼仪和有效交际能力的人。他对特权结构和系统实践的人类学方法——尤其是亲属制度和其他形式的有组织的权力——没有热情回应。作为一名音乐家,他既能听到也能感受到打鼓、跳舞和讲故事表演的力量。和鲍亚士一样,他也致力于研究传播中的语言和文化。含蓄地,他进一步推进了语言学和形态学的方式,不仅在稳定和有限的群体中研究文化,而且与连续的研究进行比较。他的政治立场,一旦其含义可以理解,强调多元化和同化的议程。用Greg Dening的绝妙术语来说,群体应该被民族化——也就是说,在日常生活中可以观察到的系统行为的基础上进行研究(Dening 2004)。在这种制度下,文化的系统化将从权力和责任付诸实践的方式中产生。赫斯科维茨和鲍亚士一样,希望学生们思想开放,对每个人种学家选择研究的任何民族都给予同情,甚至尊严——假设所有人类都生活在具有共同价值观和实践的群体中。和鲍亚士一样,他希望所有自封的社群都能有社会和政治上的平等。和鲍亚士一样,他再次呼吁对西班牙裔、法语族、美洲原住民和黑人社群(这个词在他们那个年代普遍使用)进行民族nogging。他的比较主义方法强调了历史的连续性,这些连续性可以被梳理出来。最好斗的是,他坚持黑人的文化平等。当他和妻子决定研究非洲人和非裔美国人社区时,他实际上创造了“黑人散居”的概念——尽管作为拉比的儿子,他不会使用这个词。这是1967年美国人类学协会(AAA)会议上一群民族志学家最关心的问题之一。会议上出版的《美国黑人人类学:当代视角》一书的编辑们满怀激情地敦促那些研究黑人社区的民族志学家记住,每个人都有自己的习惯方式,这些习惯方式可以用一种可以进行比较分析的方式进行报道。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ragga Soca Burning the Moral Compass: An Analysis of "Hellfire" Lyrics in the Music of Bunji Garlin Freedom Songs: Helping Black Activists, Black Residents, and White Volunteers Work Together in Hattiesburg, Mississippi, during the Summer of 1964 "Cien porciento tico tico": Reggae, Belonging, and the Afro-Caribbean Ticos of Costa Rica Revisiting the Katanga Guitar Style(s) and Some Other Early African Guitar Idioms Las Tonadas Trinitarias: History of an Afro-Cuban Musical Tradition from Trinidad de Cuba
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1