[Color differences between light-cured composite resin made shade guides and manufactured shade guides].

Shika gakuho. Dental science reports Pub Date : 1990-08-01
Y Hosoya, G Goto
{"title":"[Color differences between light-cured composite resin made shade guides and manufactured shade guides].","authors":"Y Hosoya,&nbsp;G Goto","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to investigate color differences between shade guides and light-cured composite resins. Resin specimens were made with resins and opaque resins of Silux Plus and Silux (3 M Co.) in a shade-guide metal mold. The resin specimens and the shade guides therefore were identical in shape and size. The sample resin specimens were compared with the shade guides provided with Silux Plus and Silux light-cured composite resins. Color measuring was performed with the Murakami Color Research Laboratory Fast Spectrophotometer C M S -500 and the Flexible Sensor F S -1. Specimens were placed on a plastic disc fixed to the top of the flexible sensor, and identical areas of their incisal, central, and cervical parts were measured. Conclusions. 1) The delta E*ab values between all shade guides and resin specimens showed color differences detectable to the naked eye. 2) Color differences between shade guides and resin specimens were great for the incisal colors (I, X L) and the deep and dark colors (D G, D Y, Y B, D G O, D Y O, Y B O, D D Y O). Color differences were relatively small, however, for the general colors (U, Y, G, U O, Y O, G O). 3) The L* values of shade guides ranged more widely than those of resin specimens. For many colors, L* values of the shade guides were lower than those of the resin specimens. 4) The a* values of shade guides and resin specimens were much more limited. The a* values of all colors showed minus values. The magnitude of a* values of shade guides were lower than those of resin specimens. 5) The b* values of shade guides were higher for some colors and lower for some colors than those of resin specimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":76540,"journal":{"name":"Shika gakuho. Dental science reports","volume":"90 8","pages":"1077-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shika gakuho. Dental science reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate color differences between shade guides and light-cured composite resins. Resin specimens were made with resins and opaque resins of Silux Plus and Silux (3 M Co.) in a shade-guide metal mold. The resin specimens and the shade guides therefore were identical in shape and size. The sample resin specimens were compared with the shade guides provided with Silux Plus and Silux light-cured composite resins. Color measuring was performed with the Murakami Color Research Laboratory Fast Spectrophotometer C M S -500 and the Flexible Sensor F S -1. Specimens were placed on a plastic disc fixed to the top of the flexible sensor, and identical areas of their incisal, central, and cervical parts were measured. Conclusions. 1) The delta E*ab values between all shade guides and resin specimens showed color differences detectable to the naked eye. 2) Color differences between shade guides and resin specimens were great for the incisal colors (I, X L) and the deep and dark colors (D G, D Y, Y B, D G O, D Y O, Y B O, D D Y O). Color differences were relatively small, however, for the general colors (U, Y, G, U O, Y O, G O). 3) The L* values of shade guides ranged more widely than those of resin specimens. For many colors, L* values of the shade guides were lower than those of the resin specimens. 4) The a* values of shade guides and resin specimens were much more limited. The a* values of all colors showed minus values. The magnitude of a* values of shade guides were lower than those of resin specimens. 5) The b* values of shade guides were higher for some colors and lower for some colors than those of resin specimens.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
【光固化复合树脂制作的遮光导板与成品遮光导板的色差】。
本研究的目的是研究色光导向和光固化复合树脂之间的颜色差异。用Silux Plus和Silux (3m Co.)的树脂和不透明树脂在导阴金属模具中制作树脂样品。因此,树脂标本和阴影指南在形状和大小上是相同的。将样品树脂标本与Silux Plus和光固化复合树脂提供的遮光导轨进行比较。用村上色彩研究实验室快速分光光度计C M S -500和柔性传感器F S -1进行颜色测量。将标本放置在固定在柔性传感器顶部的塑料圆盘上,测量其切、中、颈部的相同区域。结论:1)所有遮光指南与树脂样品之间的δ E*ab值存在肉眼可检测到的色差。2)阴影导线与树脂样品在切牙颜色(I, X L)和深暗颜色(dg, dd Y, Y B, dg, dd Y O, Y B O, D D Y O)上的色差较大,而在一般颜色(U, Y, G, U O, Y O, G)上的色差相对较小。3)阴影导线的L*值范围比树脂样品大。对于许多颜色,阴影指南的L*值低于树脂样品。4)遮光导板和树脂试件的a*值更有限。所有颜色的a*值均为负值。遮光导板的a*值幅度小于树脂样品。5)与树脂样品相比,阴影导影器的b*值在某些颜色上较高,在某些颜色上较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Study of structural changes in canine maxillary trabecular bone after tooth extraction]. [A study of the internal structure of the Japanese edentulous mandible]. [Oriental psychosomatic medical therapy for vertigo]. [Experimental analytical electron microscopic studies on the quantitative analysis of elemental concentrations in biological thin specimens and its application to dental science]. [Experimental studies on healing process of plication technique at postdiscal connective tissue of TMJ in Macaca fuscata].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1