The idea of a world empire of culture in the views of V.S. Solovyov and in the Russian socio-political consciousness of the XIX century

I. Evlampiev
{"title":"The idea of a world empire of culture in the views of V.S. Solovyov and in the Russian socio-political consciousness of the XIX century","authors":"I. Evlampiev","doi":"10.17588/2076-9210.2023.1.080-096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper considers the formation of the idea of a world empire in the Russian philosophical and socio-political thought of the 19th century, embracing all of humanity and based on the absolute priority of high culture. Based on the analysis of the encyclopedic article by V.S. Solovyov on this subject, it is shown that the source of this idea is in the philosophy of I.G. Fichte, who was one of the first to talk about a united Europe in his work “The Main Features of the Modern Era”, but recognized not the economy and politics, but high culture as the main factor of unity. A similar model of the coming world civilization is presented in the works about Russia and the West by F.I. Tyutchev. It is noted that the idea of “world revolution” in the book by A.I. Herzen “On the Development of Revolutionary Ideas in Russia” refers to the creation of a universal “kingdom of culture” headed by Russia in the sense that Fichte thought of it. Analysis of the work of A.I. Herzen shows that this socio-political figure was skeptical about the real revolutionary movement in Russia (which led to the revolution of 1917), calling it “autocracy in reverse”, and considered Peter I to be the true initiator of the true revolution. The paradoxical similarity of the views of Tyutchev and Herzen about the coming “kingdom of culture” was noted by F.M. Dostoevsky, who expressed his point of view in the famous Pushkin speech and through Versilov’s hero of the novel “The Row Youth”. It is concluded that the Russian Empire in its history sometimes approached the ideal model of the “kingdom of culture”, which famous Russian thinkers of the 19th century dreamed of.","PeriodicalId":445879,"journal":{"name":"Solov’evskie issledovaniya","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solov’evskie issledovaniya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17588/2076-9210.2023.1.080-096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper considers the formation of the idea of a world empire in the Russian philosophical and socio-political thought of the 19th century, embracing all of humanity and based on the absolute priority of high culture. Based on the analysis of the encyclopedic article by V.S. Solovyov on this subject, it is shown that the source of this idea is in the philosophy of I.G. Fichte, who was one of the first to talk about a united Europe in his work “The Main Features of the Modern Era”, but recognized not the economy and politics, but high culture as the main factor of unity. A similar model of the coming world civilization is presented in the works about Russia and the West by F.I. Tyutchev. It is noted that the idea of “world revolution” in the book by A.I. Herzen “On the Development of Revolutionary Ideas in Russia” refers to the creation of a universal “kingdom of culture” headed by Russia in the sense that Fichte thought of it. Analysis of the work of A.I. Herzen shows that this socio-political figure was skeptical about the real revolutionary movement in Russia (which led to the revolution of 1917), calling it “autocracy in reverse”, and considered Peter I to be the true initiator of the true revolution. The paradoxical similarity of the views of Tyutchev and Herzen about the coming “kingdom of culture” was noted by F.M. Dostoevsky, who expressed his point of view in the famous Pushkin speech and through Versilov’s hero of the novel “The Row Youth”. It is concluded that the Russian Empire in its history sometimes approached the ideal model of the “kingdom of culture”, which famous Russian thinkers of the 19th century dreamed of.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
索洛维约夫和十九世纪俄国社会政治意识中关于世界文化帝国的观点
本文考察了19世纪俄罗斯哲学和社会政治思想中世界帝国理念的形成,它包含了全人类,并以高雅文化的绝对优先地位为基础。通过对V.S. Solovyov关于这一主题的百科全书式文章的分析,表明这一思想的来源是I.G.费希特的哲学,费希特是第一个在他的作品“现代时代的主要特征”中谈到统一的欧洲的人之一,但认识到统一的主要因素不是经济和政治,而是高级文化。在f·i·秋切夫关于俄罗斯和西方的著作中,也提出了即将到来的世界文明的类似模型。值得注意的是,A.I. Herzen在《论俄国革命思想的发展》一书中提出的“世界革命”思想,是指在费希特思想的意义上,建立一个以俄国为首的世界性的“文化王国”。对A.I. Herzen作品的分析表明,这位社会政治人物对俄国真正的革命运动(导致了1917年的革命)持怀疑态度,称其为“反向专制”,并认为彼得一世是真正革命的真正发起者。陀思妥耶夫斯基(F.M. Dostoevsky)注意到了秋切夫和赫尔岑对即将到来的“文化王国”的观点的自相矛盾的相似性,他在著名的普希金演讲中表达了自己的观点,并通过凡尔赛洛夫小说《Row Youth》中的主人公表达了自己的观点。结论是,俄罗斯帝国在历史上有时接近于19世纪俄罗斯著名思想家梦想的“文化王国”的理想模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The First Edition of “The Justification of Good” (1897): Contemporaries’ Response. Part 4 The image of Philostratus in the works of K.K. Vaginov: experience of deconstruction “Real Deed of an Artist” and Philosophy of Art: Solovyev – Fyodorov – Chekrygin V.Y. Bryusov, N.F. Fedorov and the Fedorovians of the 1900s-1920s: The Question of Meaning and Goals of Art. Article one. What were Bryusov and Fedorov Arguing about in the House of Yu.P. Bartenev V.I. Lamansky. Historical letters on the attitude of Russian people to their tribesmen. The letter VI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1