A paradox of place: civic education in the rural south

Eric D. Moffa
{"title":"A paradox of place: civic education in the rural south","authors":"Eric D. Moffa","doi":"10.1108/SSRP-07-2018-0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nDue to the complexities of place and the limited knowledge of citizenship education in rural contexts, the purpose of this paper is to examine civics teachers’ perceptions of place in rural schools and its influence on their decision making about the curriculum.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA qualitative case study design was utilized. Four 12th grade civics teachers were sampled across three rural schools in a southern state. Data came from interviews, classroom observations and teaching artifacts. A constant comparison method of data analysis led to the emergence of a major theme: the paradoxical treatment of place in civic education in rural schools.\n\n\nFindings\nParticipants implemented place-based pedagogies while simultaneously promoting the narrative that students leave their home communities after graduation due to limited post-secondary opportunities (i.e. place-based learning for future (dis)placements). Participants reconciled leaving narratives and the displaced futures of students by emphasizing “the basics” devoid of place.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe paradoxical treatment of place, as influenced by teachers’ perceptions and civic sensibilities, contrasted with theoretical perspectives on place-based education that emphasize inhabiting and attending to place. Findings suggest the need to prepare rural civics teachers for place-conscious civic pedagogies to challenge paradoxical treatments of place and engender democratic investments in rural communities.\n","PeriodicalId":447901,"journal":{"name":"Social Studies Research and Practice","volume":"31 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Studies Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/SSRP-07-2018-0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose Due to the complexities of place and the limited knowledge of citizenship education in rural contexts, the purpose of this paper is to examine civics teachers’ perceptions of place in rural schools and its influence on their decision making about the curriculum. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative case study design was utilized. Four 12th grade civics teachers were sampled across three rural schools in a southern state. Data came from interviews, classroom observations and teaching artifacts. A constant comparison method of data analysis led to the emergence of a major theme: the paradoxical treatment of place in civic education in rural schools. Findings Participants implemented place-based pedagogies while simultaneously promoting the narrative that students leave their home communities after graduation due to limited post-secondary opportunities (i.e. place-based learning for future (dis)placements). Participants reconciled leaving narratives and the displaced futures of students by emphasizing “the basics” devoid of place. Originality/value The paradoxical treatment of place, as influenced by teachers’ perceptions and civic sensibilities, contrasted with theoretical perspectives on place-based education that emphasize inhabiting and attending to place. Findings suggest the need to prepare rural civics teachers for place-conscious civic pedagogies to challenge paradoxical treatments of place and engender democratic investments in rural communities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地域悖论:南方农村的公民教育
由于地方的复杂性和农村背景下公民教育的知识有限,本文的目的是研究农村学校公民教师对地方的看法及其对课程决策的影响。设计/方法/方法采用定性案例研究设计。四名12年级公民教师被抽样调查,分布在美国南部一个州的三所农村学校。数据来自访谈、课堂观察和教学文物。一种不断比较的数据分析方法引出了一个重要的主题:农村学校公民教育中对地方的矛盾处理。研究发现,参与者实施了基于地的教学法,同时宣传学生在毕业后离开家乡社区是由于有限的高等教育机会(即为未来(非)实习而进行的基于地的学习)。参与者通过强调没有地方的“基本”来协调离开叙事和学生的未来。原创性/价值受教师观念和公民情感影响的对地点的矛盾处理,与强调居住和关注地点的基于地点的教育理论观点形成对比。研究结果表明,需要为具有地方意识的公民教育学培养农村公民教师,以挑战对地方的矛盾对待,并在农村社区进行民主投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Where we are: reflecting on our use of critical mapping practices for spatial justice in teacher education “Is it a civics lesson?”: centering the local to encourage political engagement On teaching Holocaust geographies: supporting inquiry into space, persecution and civic action Learning about place from Indigenous Elders: self-study in social studies education Themed editorial: Social studies research and practice special issue: effective use of films in the social studies classroom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1