Security Test Generation by Answer Set Programming

Philipp Zech, M. Felderer, Basel Katt, R. Breu
{"title":"Security Test Generation by Answer Set Programming","authors":"Philipp Zech, M. Felderer, Basel Katt, R. Breu","doi":"10.1109/SERE.2014.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Security testing still is a hard task, especially if focusing on non-functional security testing. The two main reasons behind this are, first, at the most a lack of the necessary knowledge required for security testing, second, managing the almost infinite amount of negative test cases, which result from potential security risks. To the best of our knowledge, the issue of the automatic incorporation of security expert knowledge, e.g., known vulnerabilities, exploits and attacks, in the process of security testing is not well considered in the literature. Furthermore, well-known \"de facto\" security testing approaches, like fuzzing or penetration testing, lack systematic procedures regarding the order of execution of test cases, which renders security testing a cumbersome task. Hence, in this paper we propose a new method for generating negative security tests by logic programming, which applies a risk analysis to establish a set of negative requirements for later test generation.","PeriodicalId":248957,"journal":{"name":"2014 Eighth International Conference on Software Security and Reliability","volume":"156 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 Eighth International Conference on Software Security and Reliability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SERE.2014.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Security testing still is a hard task, especially if focusing on non-functional security testing. The two main reasons behind this are, first, at the most a lack of the necessary knowledge required for security testing, second, managing the almost infinite amount of negative test cases, which result from potential security risks. To the best of our knowledge, the issue of the automatic incorporation of security expert knowledge, e.g., known vulnerabilities, exploits and attacks, in the process of security testing is not well considered in the literature. Furthermore, well-known "de facto" security testing approaches, like fuzzing or penetration testing, lack systematic procedures regarding the order of execution of test cases, which renders security testing a cumbersome task. Hence, in this paper we propose a new method for generating negative security tests by logic programming, which applies a risk analysis to establish a set of negative requirements for later test generation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于答案集编程的安全测试生成
安全性测试仍然是一项艰巨的任务,特别是关注非功能安全性测试时。这背后的两个主要原因是,第一,最多缺乏安全测试所需的必要知识,第二,管理几乎无限数量的负面测试用例,这是由潜在的安全风险造成的。据我们所知,在安全测试过程中自动纳入安全专家知识(例如,已知的漏洞、利用和攻击)的问题在文献中没有得到很好的考虑。此外,众所周知的“事实”安全性测试方法,如模糊测试或渗透测试,缺乏关于测试用例执行顺序的系统过程,这使得安全性测试成为一项繁琐的任务。因此,本文提出了一种通过逻辑编程生成负性安全测试的新方法,该方法利用风险分析来建立一组负性需求,供以后的测试生成使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
High Performance Java Card Operating System Fast Discovery of VM-Sensitive Divergence Points with Basic Block Comparison Traceability-Based Formal Specification Inspection SeTGaM: Generalized Technique for Regression Testing Based on UML/OCL Models Game-Theoretic Strategy Analysis for Data Reliability Management in Cloud Storage Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1