Distributing Sparse Matrix/Graph Applications in Heterogeneous Clusters - an Experimental Study

Charilaos Tzovas, Maria Predari, Henning Meyerhenke
{"title":"Distributing Sparse Matrix/Graph Applications in Heterogeneous Clusters - an Experimental Study","authors":"Charilaos Tzovas, Maria Predari, Henning Meyerhenke","doi":"10.1109/HiPC50609.2020.00021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many problems in scientific and engineering applications contain sparse matrices or graphs as main input objects, e.g., numerical simulations on meshes. Large inputs are abundant these days and require parallel processing for memory size and speed. To optimize the execution of such simulations on cluster systems, the input problem needs to be distributed suitably onto the processing units (PUs). More and more frequently, such clusters contain different CPUs or a combination of CPUs and GPUs. This heterogeneity makes the load distribution problem quite challenging. Our study is motivated by the observation that established partitioning tools do not handle such heterogeneous distribution problems as well as homogeneous ones. In this paper, we first formulate the problem of balanced load distribution for heterogeneous architectures as a multiobjective, single-constraint optimization problem. We then split the problem into two phases and propose a greedy approach to determine optimal block sizes for each PU. These block sizes are then fed into numerous existing graph partitioners, for us to examine how well they handle the above problem. One of the tools we consider is an extension of our own previous work (von Looz et al., ICPP'18) called Geographer. Our experiments on well-known benchmark meshes indicate that only two tools under consideration are able to yield good quality. These two are ParMetis (both the geometric and the combinatorial variant) and Geographer. While ParMetis is faster, Geographer yields better quality on average.","PeriodicalId":375004,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE 27th International Conference on High Performance Computing, Data, and Analytics (HiPC)","volume":"118 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE 27th International Conference on High Performance Computing, Data, and Analytics (HiPC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HiPC50609.2020.00021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Many problems in scientific and engineering applications contain sparse matrices or graphs as main input objects, e.g., numerical simulations on meshes. Large inputs are abundant these days and require parallel processing for memory size and speed. To optimize the execution of such simulations on cluster systems, the input problem needs to be distributed suitably onto the processing units (PUs). More and more frequently, such clusters contain different CPUs or a combination of CPUs and GPUs. This heterogeneity makes the load distribution problem quite challenging. Our study is motivated by the observation that established partitioning tools do not handle such heterogeneous distribution problems as well as homogeneous ones. In this paper, we first formulate the problem of balanced load distribution for heterogeneous architectures as a multiobjective, single-constraint optimization problem. We then split the problem into two phases and propose a greedy approach to determine optimal block sizes for each PU. These block sizes are then fed into numerous existing graph partitioners, for us to examine how well they handle the above problem. One of the tools we consider is an extension of our own previous work (von Looz et al., ICPP'18) called Geographer. Our experiments on well-known benchmark meshes indicate that only two tools under consideration are able to yield good quality. These two are ParMetis (both the geometric and the combinatorial variant) and Geographer. While ParMetis is faster, Geographer yields better quality on average.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分布稀疏矩阵/图在异构集群中的应用——一个实验研究
科学和工程应用中的许多问题都包含稀疏矩阵或图作为主要输入对象,例如网格上的数值模拟。如今大量输入需要并行处理,以满足内存大小和速度的要求。为了优化此类模拟在集群系统上的执行,输入问题需要适当地分布到处理单元(pu)上。这种集群越来越频繁地包含不同的cpu或cpu和gpu的组合。这种异构性使得负载分配问题非常具有挑战性。我们的研究的动机是观察到建立的划分工具不能处理这种异构分布问题以及同质分布问题。在本文中,我们首先将异构架构的均衡负载分配问题表述为一个多目标、单约束的优化问题。然后,我们将问题分为两个阶段,并提出一种贪婪方法来确定每个PU的最佳块大小。然后将这些块大小馈送到许多现有的图分区器中,以便我们检查它们如何处理上述问题。我们考虑的工具之一是我们自己以前的工作(von Looz et al., ICPP'18)的扩展,称为地理学家。我们在众所周知的基准网格上的实验表明,只有两种工具能够产生良好的质量。这两个是ParMetis(几何和组合变体)和地理学家。ParMetis更快,而geography的平均质量更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
HiPC 2020 ORGANIZATION HiPC 2020 Industry Sponsors PufferFish: NUMA-Aware Work-stealing Library using Elastic Tasks Algorithms for Preemptive Co-scheduling of Kernels on GPUs 27th IEEE International Conference on High Performance Computing, Data, and Analytics (HiPC 2020) Technical program
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1