Effect of Liquid-Liquid Subsea Separation on Production Forecast Considering Integration of a Deepwater Reservoir and Surface Facility Models

A. Bigdeli, J. C. von Hohendorff Filho, D. Schiozer
{"title":"Effect of Liquid-Liquid Subsea Separation on Production Forecast Considering Integration of a Deepwater Reservoir and Surface Facility Models","authors":"A. Bigdeli, J. C. von Hohendorff Filho, D. Schiozer","doi":"10.2118/214455-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this work, we present a case study of the integration of surface facility models and a deepwater reservoir, as well as an engineering evaluation of the implications of liquid-liquid subsea separation (LLSS) on the integration process. For this, a heavy oil sandstone reservoir and several surface facility layouts were computationally integrated using a commercial simulator.\n A gathering unit, subsea separator, and water disposal unit were added to the surface facility model layouts to support the LLSS system. The term \"merge scenario\" was used to refer to the quantity of production streams that were gathered and delivered to the subsea separator. To allow the production from the reservoir model, the minimum bottom-hole pressure (BHP) for the producing wells were defined for all the simulations. Our investigation includes fluids produced at platforms, produced water at disposal unit, the pressure drop in the riser in terms of hydrostatic and friction terms, and economic analyses of these investigations.\n This case study shows that, depending on the merging situation, the reservoir needs 2 to 5 times more injection water than the separated water. Despite efforts to reduce the pressure restriction in the surface facility by increasing the riser diameter, the oil recovery did not change significantly when the number of merging wells was adjusted. This happened because the wellhead was not affected by the production system's pressure disturbance and the surface facility models’ boundary conditions remained unchanged. The economic calculations also indicated that the value of the technology (the highest acceptable price for the technology) for eleven merge scenario was 130 MMUSD and the OPEX and CAPEX can be lowered by 95 and 35 MMUSD (3% and 5% on average), respectively. This economic benefit was due to the lower cost of platform water handling from the produced water separation. In later stages of simulations, when the water cut surpasses 90%, hydrostatic pressure loss overtakes friction pressure loss as the primary contributor to overall pressure losses in the riser for 11 merge scenarios. These tests demonstrated that adding LLSS increases the complexity of the integration process and engineers can apply the engineering ideas of this study to other field designs in development.\n This work is the first case study of its kind that examines the relationship between the impact of LLS and the integration of a deep-water reservoir and surface facility model. This article's production forecast problem description can be utilized as a starting point to develop a general methodology for simulating complicated offshore production systems using LLSS operations.","PeriodicalId":306106,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, June 08, 2023","volume":"40 1-8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, June 08, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/214455-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this work, we present a case study of the integration of surface facility models and a deepwater reservoir, as well as an engineering evaluation of the implications of liquid-liquid subsea separation (LLSS) on the integration process. For this, a heavy oil sandstone reservoir and several surface facility layouts were computationally integrated using a commercial simulator. A gathering unit, subsea separator, and water disposal unit were added to the surface facility model layouts to support the LLSS system. The term "merge scenario" was used to refer to the quantity of production streams that were gathered and delivered to the subsea separator. To allow the production from the reservoir model, the minimum bottom-hole pressure (BHP) for the producing wells were defined for all the simulations. Our investigation includes fluids produced at platforms, produced water at disposal unit, the pressure drop in the riser in terms of hydrostatic and friction terms, and economic analyses of these investigations. This case study shows that, depending on the merging situation, the reservoir needs 2 to 5 times more injection water than the separated water. Despite efforts to reduce the pressure restriction in the surface facility by increasing the riser diameter, the oil recovery did not change significantly when the number of merging wells was adjusted. This happened because the wellhead was not affected by the production system's pressure disturbance and the surface facility models’ boundary conditions remained unchanged. The economic calculations also indicated that the value of the technology (the highest acceptable price for the technology) for eleven merge scenario was 130 MMUSD and the OPEX and CAPEX can be lowered by 95 and 35 MMUSD (3% and 5% on average), respectively. This economic benefit was due to the lower cost of platform water handling from the produced water separation. In later stages of simulations, when the water cut surpasses 90%, hydrostatic pressure loss overtakes friction pressure loss as the primary contributor to overall pressure losses in the riser for 11 merge scenarios. These tests demonstrated that adding LLSS increases the complexity of the integration process and engineers can apply the engineering ideas of this study to other field designs in development. This work is the first case study of its kind that examines the relationship between the impact of LLS and the integration of a deep-water reservoir and surface facility model. This article's production forecast problem description can be utilized as a starting point to develop a general methodology for simulating complicated offshore production systems using LLSS operations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考虑深水油藏和地面设施模型集成的海底液液分离对产量预测的影响
在这项工作中,我们介绍了地面设施模型与深水油藏集成的案例研究,以及液-液海底分离(LLSS)对集成过程的影响的工程评估。为此,使用商用模拟器对稠油砂岩油藏和几种地面设施布局进行了计算集成。地面设施模型布局中增加了收集单元、海底分离器和水处理单元,以支持LLSS系统。“合并场景”指的是收集并输送到海底分离器的生产流的数量。为了允许从油藏模型中进行生产,所有模拟都定义了生产井的最小井底压力(BHP)。我们的研究包括平台产生的流体、处理单元的产出水、立管的水压和摩擦压降,以及这些研究的经济分析。该案例研究表明,根据合并情况的不同,油藏需要的注入水量是分离水的2 ~ 5倍。尽管通过增加立管直径来降低地面设施的压力限制,但当调整合并井的数量时,采收率并没有明显变化。这是因为井口不受生产系统压力扰动的影响,地面设施模型的边界条件保持不变。经济计算还表明,在11个合并方案中,该技术的价值(该技术的最高可接受价格)为130万桶/天,运营成本和资本支出可以分别降低95万桶/天和35万桶/天(平均分别降低3%和5%)。这种经济效益是由于采出水分离后的平台水处理成本较低。在模拟的后期阶段,当含水率超过90%时,静水压力损失超过摩擦压力损失,成为11种合并方案中立管总压力损失的主要贡献者。这些测试表明,添加LLSS增加了集成过程的复杂性,工程师可以将本研究的工程思想应用于开发中的其他领域设计。这项工作是同类研究中第一个研究LLS影响与深水油藏和地面设施模型集成之间关系的案例。本文的产量预测问题描述可以作为一个起点,用于开发使用LLSS操作模拟复杂海上生产系统的通用方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Utilization of Microfluidics Technology for an Efficient Polymer Screening Process in Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) Applications Decarbonization Will Not Come for Free: Asset-M Marginal Abatement Cost Curve Comparing WAG-CO2 Injection with Continuous Water and Gas Injection in Separate Wells for the Development and Management of a CO2-Rich Light Oil Fractured Carbonate Reservoir Subject to Full Gas Recycling ESG, Sustainability and Decarbonization: An Analysis of Strategies and Solutions for the Energy Industry Feasibility Evaluation of Warm Solvent Assisted Gravity Drainage Process in Low-Carbon Developing Super-Heavy Oil or Oil Sands Project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1