PPI versus CPI inflation

W. Gavin
{"title":"PPI versus CPI inflation","authors":"W. Gavin","doi":"10.20955/ES.2003.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I n November and December of 2002, the producer price index (PPI) declined unexpectedly, contributing to concerns about deflation. In November, the PPI for finished goods fell 0.4 percent. In December, although analysts expected a 0.3 percent increase, it was unchanged. In each of these months the core PPI (that is, the PPI excluding food and energy) surprised analysts by falling 0.3 percent. Should we be concerned about declines in the PPI as a possible harbinger of economy-wide deflation? The chart, which presents a long-run perspective on the consumer price index (CPI) and the PPI, includes four price measures that are indexed to one in January 1967: (i) the PPI, (ii) the all-item CPI, and (iii) the services and (iv) goods components of the CPI. Since at least 1980, services prices have tended to rise relative to goods prices. In just the past five years, the services component of the CPI has increased at an average rate of 3.2 percent per year, while the goods component has increased at only a 1.1 percent rate. Why have goods prices risen so much more slowly than services prices? The answer, as shown by the data, is tremendous advances in technology and productivity in goods production. For example, the PPI component for electronic com puters and computer equipment has fallen an average of 12.3 percent per year for the past five years. Com puter prices are expected to decline far into the future, and no one thinks that this is a sign of deflation. Rather, it is a sign of technological advances and cost saving in computer manufacturing. The average price changes for the eight major components of the CPI have been widely dispersed in the past five years. The food component of the CPI increased at an average rate of 2.2 percent— which is close to the all-item CPI inflation rate (2.3 percent). Four components had lower average price increases than the all-item CPI: apparel (–1.6 percent), transportation (1.5 percent), recreation (1.3 percent), and education and communications (1.8 percent). The fall in electronic equipment prices has helped moderate the relative rise in communications prices. Three components had higher average price increases than the all-item CPI: housing (2.8 percent), medical care (4.1 percent), and the “other” category (5.0 percent). The “other” category includes tobacco products and personal care services. We should not be too concerned about price declines in the PPI (or any subset of the CPI basket) as long as the broad price indexes such as the CPI are stable. If CPI inflation remains at about 2 percent per year, then recent trends suggest that the PPI will increase at a rate of about 1 percent. Similarly, CPI inflation would have to be below 1 percent before we would expect to see ongoing price declines in the goods sector. PPI versus CPI Inflation","PeriodicalId":305484,"journal":{"name":"National Economic Trends","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Economic Trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20955/ES.2003.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

I n November and December of 2002, the producer price index (PPI) declined unexpectedly, contributing to concerns about deflation. In November, the PPI for finished goods fell 0.4 percent. In December, although analysts expected a 0.3 percent increase, it was unchanged. In each of these months the core PPI (that is, the PPI excluding food and energy) surprised analysts by falling 0.3 percent. Should we be concerned about declines in the PPI as a possible harbinger of economy-wide deflation? The chart, which presents a long-run perspective on the consumer price index (CPI) and the PPI, includes four price measures that are indexed to one in January 1967: (i) the PPI, (ii) the all-item CPI, and (iii) the services and (iv) goods components of the CPI. Since at least 1980, services prices have tended to rise relative to goods prices. In just the past five years, the services component of the CPI has increased at an average rate of 3.2 percent per year, while the goods component has increased at only a 1.1 percent rate. Why have goods prices risen so much more slowly than services prices? The answer, as shown by the data, is tremendous advances in technology and productivity in goods production. For example, the PPI component for electronic com puters and computer equipment has fallen an average of 12.3 percent per year for the past five years. Com puter prices are expected to decline far into the future, and no one thinks that this is a sign of deflation. Rather, it is a sign of technological advances and cost saving in computer manufacturing. The average price changes for the eight major components of the CPI have been widely dispersed in the past five years. The food component of the CPI increased at an average rate of 2.2 percent— which is close to the all-item CPI inflation rate (2.3 percent). Four components had lower average price increases than the all-item CPI: apparel (–1.6 percent), transportation (1.5 percent), recreation (1.3 percent), and education and communications (1.8 percent). The fall in electronic equipment prices has helped moderate the relative rise in communications prices. Three components had higher average price increases than the all-item CPI: housing (2.8 percent), medical care (4.1 percent), and the “other” category (5.0 percent). The “other” category includes tobacco products and personal care services. We should not be too concerned about price declines in the PPI (or any subset of the CPI basket) as long as the broad price indexes such as the CPI are stable. If CPI inflation remains at about 2 percent per year, then recent trends suggest that the PPI will increase at a rate of about 1 percent. Similarly, CPI inflation would have to be below 1 percent before we would expect to see ongoing price declines in the goods sector. PPI versus CPI Inflation
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PPI与CPI通胀
2002年11月和12月,生产者物价指数(PPI)意外下降,引发了通货紧缩的担忧。11月,制成品PPI下降0.4%。去年12月,尽管分析师预计会增长0.3%,但结果没有变化。在这几个月的每个月里,核心PPI(即剔除食品和能源的PPI)都意外地下降了0.3%。我们是否应该担心,PPI下降可能预示着整个经济将出现通缩?该图表展示了消费者价格指数(CPI)和PPI的长期前景,包括1967年1月的四种价格指标:(i) PPI, (ii)所有项目CPI, (iii) CPI的服务和(iv)商品组成部分。至少自1980年以来,服务价格相对于商品价格一直呈上升趋势。在过去的五年里,CPI中服务部分的平均年增长率为3.2%,而商品部分的增长率仅为1.1%。为什么商品价格的上涨比服务价格慢得多?正如数据所显示的那样,答案是技术和商品生产生产率的巨大进步。例如,电子计算机和计算机设备的PPI组成部分在过去五年中平均每年下降12.3%。电脑价格预计将在未来很长一段时间内下降,没有人认为这是通货紧缩的迹象。相反,这是计算机制造业技术进步和成本节约的标志。过去5年,CPI的8个主要组成部分的平均价格变化非常分散。CPI中食品部分的平均涨幅为2.2%,接近所有项目的CPI通胀率(2.3%)。4个项目的平均价格涨幅低于所有项目:服装(- 1.6%)、交通(1.5%)、娱乐(1.3%)、教育和通讯(1.8%)。电子设备价格的下降有助于缓和通信价格的相对上涨。三个组成部分的平均价格涨幅高于所有项目CPI:住房(2.8%),医疗保健(4.1%)和“其他”类别(5.0%)。“其他”类别包括烟草产品和个人护理服务。只要CPI等广义价格指数保持稳定,我们就不应该过于担心PPI(或CPI篮子中的任何一个子集)的价格下跌。如果CPI通胀率保持在每年2%左右,那么最近的趋势表明,PPI将以1%左右的速度增长。同样,在我们预期看到商品部门价格持续下降之前,CPI通胀率必须低于1%。PPI与CPI通胀
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The seasonal cycle and the business cycle U.S. exporters: a rare breed Expected stock market returns and business investment Ringing in the new year with an investment bust A case for oil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1