Procjena boli u pedijatrijskih bolesnika - pregled literature

Helena Mayerhoffer, Adriano Friganović
{"title":"Procjena boli u pedijatrijskih bolesnika - pregled literature","authors":"Helena Mayerhoffer, Adriano Friganović","doi":"10.24141/2/7/1/7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience caused by existing or possible tissue damage. Pediatric patients are a sensitive group whose experience of pain is influenced by various other factors, so the assessment and treatment of pain itself is of a different nature than adults. Correct assessment of pain enables adequate treatment and alleviation of complaints. Aim. The aim of the paper was to perform a systematic review of the literature related to the assessment of pain in pediatric patients and to gather available knowledge on the reliability and validity of certain pain assessment methods in one place. Methods. The PubMed database was searched with the aim of finding studies indicating the reliability and validity of the Wong-Baker, VAS, COMFORT and FLACC scales. Included papers are systematic reviews, review articles and research papers published in the period from 2000 to 2020. Languages that were acceptable for the inclusion were English and Croatian. Keywords used for searching the database were pain assessment, pediatrics and pain scales. Results. According to the inclusion criteria for this paper, 9 studies were used in which pediatric patients from birth to 18 years of age were included. The guidelines indicate the clinical reliability of the listed scales with guidance on which scales are better to use in which cases. Pain assessment scales have been proven by research to be a good indicator of pain in children, whether self-reported with the VAS or WongBaker scale or assessed by a medical professional with the FLACC, COMFORT or EVENDOL scale. Conclusion. Researches recommend the VAS scale for older children, while the Wong-Baker scale is suitable for children up to 7 years old. The COMFORT scale has been clinically validated, the FLACC scale is both valid and reliable, particularly for children up to 7 years old. The EVENDOL scale is recommended in emergency cases involving children up to 8 years old.","PeriodicalId":293897,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Nursing Journal","volume":"227 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24141/2/7/1/7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience caused by existing or possible tissue damage. Pediatric patients are a sensitive group whose experience of pain is influenced by various other factors, so the assessment and treatment of pain itself is of a different nature than adults. Correct assessment of pain enables adequate treatment and alleviation of complaints. Aim. The aim of the paper was to perform a systematic review of the literature related to the assessment of pain in pediatric patients and to gather available knowledge on the reliability and validity of certain pain assessment methods in one place. Methods. The PubMed database was searched with the aim of finding studies indicating the reliability and validity of the Wong-Baker, VAS, COMFORT and FLACC scales. Included papers are systematic reviews, review articles and research papers published in the period from 2000 to 2020. Languages that were acceptable for the inclusion were English and Croatian. Keywords used for searching the database were pain assessment, pediatrics and pain scales. Results. According to the inclusion criteria for this paper, 9 studies were used in which pediatric patients from birth to 18 years of age were included. The guidelines indicate the clinical reliability of the listed scales with guidance on which scales are better to use in which cases. Pain assessment scales have been proven by research to be a good indicator of pain in children, whether self-reported with the VAS or WongBaker scale or assessed by a medical professional with the FLACC, COMFORT or EVENDOL scale. Conclusion. Researches recommend the VAS scale for older children, while the Wong-Baker scale is suitable for children up to 7 years old. The COMFORT scale has been clinically validated, the FLACC scale is both valid and reliable, particularly for children up to 7 years old. The EVENDOL scale is recommended in emergency cases involving children up to 8 years old.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
介绍。疼痛是由现有或可能的组织损伤引起的一种不愉快的感觉和情绪体验。儿童患者是一个敏感的群体,他们对疼痛的体验受到各种其他因素的影响,因此对疼痛本身的评估和治疗与成人具有不同的性质。对疼痛的正确评估有助于适当的治疗和减轻主诉。的目标。本文的目的是对与儿科患者疼痛评估相关的文献进行系统的回顾,并在一个地方收集有关某些疼痛评估方法的可靠性和有效性的可用知识。方法。检索PubMed数据库,目的是寻找表明Wong-Baker、VAS、COMFORT和FLACC量表的信度和效度的研究。收录的论文为2000年至2020年期间发表的系统综述、综述文章和研究论文。可以接受列入的语言是英语和克罗地亚语。检索数据库的关键词为疼痛评估、儿科学和疼痛量表。结果。根据本文的纳入标准,纳入了9项研究,其中包括出生至18岁的儿科患者。该指南指出了所列量表的临床可靠性,并指导了哪种量表在哪种情况下更适合使用。疼痛评估量表已被研究证明是儿童疼痛的一个很好的指标,无论是用VAS或WongBaker量表自我报告,还是由医学专业人员用FLACC、COMFORT或EVENDOL量表评估。结论。研究人员推荐年龄较大的儿童使用VAS量表,而Wong-Baker量表适用于7岁以下的儿童。COMFORT量表已经过临床验证,FLACC量表有效可靠,尤其适用于7岁以下儿童。在涉及8岁以下儿童的紧急情况下,建议使用EVENDOL量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Informing and Preparing Patients for Echocardiography Specifičnost sestrinske skrbi u zbrinjavanju sijamskih blizanaca Zdravstvena pismenost kod kroničnih bolesnika oboljelih od epilepsije Abbreviation Use Habits in Nurses’ Work Uloga medicinske sestre u artroplastici kuka i koljena u jednodnevnoj kirurgiji
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1