Fiscal incentives, Clark’s triangle, and the shape and shaping of higher education systems

Daniel W. Lang
{"title":"Fiscal incentives, Clark’s triangle, and the shape and shaping of higher education systems","authors":"Daniel W. Lang","doi":"10.1080/23322969.2016.1246065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT For nearly 35 year’s Burton Clark’s triangle has been used as a paradigm for describing, assessing, and comparing systems of post-secondary education. Since then two major developments, neither of which could Clark have foreseen, in the financial management of higher education have occurred contemporaneously: incentive or performance funding on the part of the state and incentive-based budgeting on the part of universities. Both developments are based on fiscal incentives. Despite several inherent and inter-connected similarities, incentive funding and incentive-based budgeting have been appraised on parallel tracks, neither of which has led to a possible effect on Clark’s fundamental model, particularly with regard to the interaction of institutional behavior as it is shaped by and shapes systems of higher education. This study investigates their convergence with one another and the consequential effect on the relationship between the state, the university, and the market as foreseen by Clark’s Triangle. The study concludes that, although incentive funding and incentive-based budgeting are sometimes at cross-purposes, they are functionally so inter-connected, whether intentionally or coincidentally, and that they may change the shape of a given system’s 'triangle' by altering the zero-sum balance between the state, market and academic legs of the triangle.","PeriodicalId":212965,"journal":{"name":"Policy Reviews in Higher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy Reviews in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2016.1246065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT For nearly 35 year’s Burton Clark’s triangle has been used as a paradigm for describing, assessing, and comparing systems of post-secondary education. Since then two major developments, neither of which could Clark have foreseen, in the financial management of higher education have occurred contemporaneously: incentive or performance funding on the part of the state and incentive-based budgeting on the part of universities. Both developments are based on fiscal incentives. Despite several inherent and inter-connected similarities, incentive funding and incentive-based budgeting have been appraised on parallel tracks, neither of which has led to a possible effect on Clark’s fundamental model, particularly with regard to the interaction of institutional behavior as it is shaped by and shapes systems of higher education. This study investigates their convergence with one another and the consequential effect on the relationship between the state, the university, and the market as foreseen by Clark’s Triangle. The study concludes that, although incentive funding and incentive-based budgeting are sometimes at cross-purposes, they are functionally so inter-connected, whether intentionally or coincidentally, and that they may change the shape of a given system’s 'triangle' by altering the zero-sum balance between the state, market and academic legs of the triangle.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
财政激励,克拉克三角,高等教育体系的形成
近35年来,伯顿·克拉克三角理论一直被用作描述、评估和比较高等教育体系的范式。从那以后,高等教育的财务管理出现了两个克拉克都无法预见的重大发展:州政府的激励或绩效基金和大学的基于激励的预算。这两项发展都是基于财政激励。尽管存在一些内在的和相互关联的相似性,但激励资金和基于激励的预算已经在平行轨道上进行了评估,这两者都没有对克拉克的基本模型产生可能的影响,特别是关于制度行为的相互作用,因为它是由高等教育系统塑造的。本研究考察了三者之间的趋同,以及克拉克三角理论对国家、大学和市场三者之间关系的影响。该研究得出的结论是,尽管激励性资金和基于激励性的预算有时是相互矛盾的,但它们在功能上是相互联系的,无论是有意的还是巧合的,它们可能通过改变国家、市场和学术界之间的零和平衡来改变给定系统的“三角形”的形状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Peeling the multiple layers of inequalities in free higher education policies Intermediary organizations and their role in advancing the SDGs in higher education Provincial government and institution level strategy setting: the case of building Chinese ‘world-class universities’ POLICY REVIEWS IN HIGHER EDUCATION: EDITORIAL, Volume 7, Issue 2, September 2023 Isomorphic tensions and anxiety in UK social science doctoral provision
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1