A review on drug regulation policy in the Netherlands and India: the history of current policy development, and policy analysis

Tapashi Adhikary, Pratik Kumar Bal, Kumar Sumit
{"title":"A review on drug regulation policy in the Netherlands and India: the history of current policy development, and policy analysis","authors":"Tapashi Adhikary, Pratik Kumar Bal, Kumar Sumit","doi":"10.55889/2582-7979.1026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I ntroduction : Since historical times, drug use and illicit trafficking of drugs have been a common problem in both the Netherlands and India. The Dutch Drug Policy (DDP) model combines both leniency and strict laws whereas the Indian Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPS Act) went from being a stringent policy in the past to a more flexible one lenient policy in recent years. The objective of the current review was to explore the history of the development of the Netherlands and India’s drug regulating policies, followed by the analysis of the policies using the Walt and Gilson health policy triangle. Methods: Official government documents and relevant articles on the DDP and NDPS act were identified for policy analysis. Analysis of the policies showed the effectiveness of the DDP model in controlling the drug problems in the Netherlands in some instances. Results : The results of the analysis also highlight some gaps in the Indian NDPS act. Based on the analysis of the two policies, the review explores the possibilities of implementing similar policy measures adopted under the DDP in the Indian NDPS Act for future reforms. However, the review acknowledges the disparity in culture and political system in the two countries and hence suggests deliberation of the policy measures implemented under the DDP before considering their implementation under the Indian NDPS Act. Conclusion: The review aimed the direction of future research towards generating more evidence on contextual factors unique to the Dutch and Indian societies and prevailing circumstances arising due to modern-day drug problems for a recommendation of evidence-based policy reforms.","PeriodicalId":286756,"journal":{"name":"Manipal Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manipal Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55889/2582-7979.1026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I ntroduction : Since historical times, drug use and illicit trafficking of drugs have been a common problem in both the Netherlands and India. The Dutch Drug Policy (DDP) model combines both leniency and strict laws whereas the Indian Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPS Act) went from being a stringent policy in the past to a more flexible one lenient policy in recent years. The objective of the current review was to explore the history of the development of the Netherlands and India’s drug regulating policies, followed by the analysis of the policies using the Walt and Gilson health policy triangle. Methods: Official government documents and relevant articles on the DDP and NDPS act were identified for policy analysis. Analysis of the policies showed the effectiveness of the DDP model in controlling the drug problems in the Netherlands in some instances. Results : The results of the analysis also highlight some gaps in the Indian NDPS act. Based on the analysis of the two policies, the review explores the possibilities of implementing similar policy measures adopted under the DDP in the Indian NDPS Act for future reforms. However, the review acknowledges the disparity in culture and political system in the two countries and hence suggests deliberation of the policy measures implemented under the DDP before considering their implementation under the Indian NDPS Act. Conclusion: The review aimed the direction of future research towards generating more evidence on contextual factors unique to the Dutch and Indian societies and prevailing circumstances arising due to modern-day drug problems for a recommendation of evidence-based policy reforms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
荷兰和印度药物管制政策综述:当前政策发展的历史和政策分析
1导言:自古以来,吸毒和非法贩运毒品在荷兰和印度都是一个共同的问题。荷兰药物政策(DDP)模式结合了宽松和严格的法律,而印度麻醉药品和精神药物法案(NDPS法案)从过去的严格政策转变为近年来更加灵活的宽松政策。本次审查的目的是探讨荷兰和印度药物管制政策的发展历史,然后利用沃尔特和吉尔森卫生政策三角分析这些政策。方法:选取政府官方文件及有关DDP和NDPS法案的相关文章进行政策分析。对政策的分析表明,在某些情况下,发展方案模式在控制荷兰的毒品问题方面是有效的。结果:分析结果还突出了印度NDPS法案中的一些差距。在分析这两项政策的基础上,本文探讨了在未来的改革中,在印度NDPS法案中实施DDP下采取的类似政策措施的可能性。然而,该审查承认两国文化和政治制度的差异,因此建议在考虑根据印度NDPS法案实施政策措施之前,先考虑根据DDP实施的政策措施。结论:审查的目的是为今后的研究方向提供更多关于荷兰和印度社会特有的背景因素和由于现代毒品问题而产生的普遍情况的证据,以建议基于证据的政策改革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of exam anxiety level among students from selected educational institutions with a view to prepare a self help guide “A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY TO ASSESS THE EFFECTS OF LIVER CHIRROSIS ON THE SKIN AMONG LIVER CHIRROSIS PATIENTS AT MEDICAL WARD IN SELECTED HOSPITAL, TAMILNADU, INDIA” Vanishing Twins Syndrome (VTS) - A case report Evidence based Interventions for stoma care for children with tracheostomy to prevent& reduce wound complications- A Systematic Review A STUDY TO ASSESS THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE AWARENESS PROGRAM ABOUT THE RISK FACTORS FOR CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE AMONG ADOLESCENTS IN SELECTED SCHOOLS, NEW DELHI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1