{"title":"Utilidad y limitaciones de las valoraciones por múltiplos (Valuations with Multiples)","authors":"Pablo Fernández, Jose M. Carabias","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.918469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spanish Abstract: La conclusion fundamental es que los multiplos casi siempre tienen una gran dispersion. Por este motivo las valoraciones realizadas por multiplos son casi siempre muy cuestionables. Sin embargo, los multiplos si son utiles en una segunda fase de la valoracion: una vez realizada la valoracion por descuento de flujos, una comparacion con los multiplos de empresas comparables permite calibrar la valoracion realizada e identificar diferencias entre la empresa valorada y las comparables. Tambien pueden ser utiles para calcular el valor terminal en una valoracion por descuento de flujos, siempre que el multiplo utilizado tenga una magnitud y una interpretacion “sensatas”.English Abstract: This paper focuses on equity valuation using multiples. Our basic conclusion is that multiples nearly always have broad dispersion, which is why valuations performed using multiples may be highly debatable. We revise the 14 most popular multiples and deal with the problem of using multiples for valuation: their dispersion. 1,200 multiples from 175 companies illustrate the dispersion of multiples of European utilities, English utilities, European constructors, hotel companies, telecommunications, banks and Internet companies. However, multiples are useful in a second stage of the valuation: after performing the valuation using another method, a comparison with the multiples of comparable firms enables us to gauge the valuation performed and identify differences between the firm valued and the firms it is compared with.","PeriodicalId":437258,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Finance: Capital Structure & Payout Policies","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Finance: Capital Structure & Payout Policies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.918469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Spanish Abstract: La conclusion fundamental es que los multiplos casi siempre tienen una gran dispersion. Por este motivo las valoraciones realizadas por multiplos son casi siempre muy cuestionables. Sin embargo, los multiplos si son utiles en una segunda fase de la valoracion: una vez realizada la valoracion por descuento de flujos, una comparacion con los multiplos de empresas comparables permite calibrar la valoracion realizada e identificar diferencias entre la empresa valorada y las comparables. Tambien pueden ser utiles para calcular el valor terminal en una valoracion por descuento de flujos, siempre que el multiplo utilizado tenga una magnitud y una interpretacion “sensatas”.English Abstract: This paper focuses on equity valuation using multiples. Our basic conclusion is that multiples nearly always have broad dispersion, which is why valuations performed using multiples may be highly debatable. We revise the 14 most popular multiples and deal with the problem of using multiples for valuation: their dispersion. 1,200 multiples from 175 companies illustrate the dispersion of multiples of European utilities, English utilities, European constructors, hotel companies, telecommunications, banks and Internet companies. However, multiples are useful in a second stage of the valuation: after performing the valuation using another method, a comparison with the multiples of comparable firms enables us to gauge the valuation performed and identify differences between the firm valued and the firms it is compared with.