Extractive Industries and Public Participation in Russia: The Case of the Oil Industry in Izhemskii District, Komi Republic

S. Nystėn-Haarala, M. Pappila, Ekaterina Britcyna
{"title":"Extractive Industries and Public Participation in Russia: The Case of the Oil Industry in Izhemskii District, Komi Republic","authors":"S. Nystėn-Haarala, M. Pappila, Ekaterina Britcyna","doi":"10.1163/22116427_009010007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on the participatory rights of local people living in the areas of extensive oil industry operations in the Izhemskii district of the Komi Republic in Russia. The district has long been suffering from oil leaks and resulting negative environmental impacts. Lukoil-Komi bought the business directly after the Soviet era and inherited the ecological threats related to old and rusty pipelines. Lukoil-Komi has promised to put things in order, but a great deal remains to be done.This article scrutinizes how statutory law and private governance interact in protecting the participatory rights of local people living in the vicinity of oil production in Komi. First, we evaluate what participatory rights Russian legislation guarantees to local people when oil production arrives in a new area or when new wells are being explored or opened. Second, we elaborate how the major oil company in the region – Lukoil-Komi – fulfills its corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the area of participatory rights and how local people feel about their possibility to exercise their participatory rights. As participatory rights, we discuss both procedural justice with public hearings and distributive justice in the form of benefit-sharing between the company and local community. The wider perspective on participation is due to Russian CSR practices. In Russia, companies tend to earn their Social License to Operate (SLO) through benefit-sharing, often within private governance. This practice is based on the social partnership agreements between authorities and companies. These contracts have path-dependent features resembling earlier Soviet solutions. The same can be claimed to apply to a wider SLO with more focus on local communities. We argue that Lukoil-Komi has not yet been able to achieve an SLO (local acceptance) due to the lack of participatory rights and continuing environmental problems. Most local people are not willing to trade a clean environment and participatory rights for the social benefits the company offers. However, the social partnership agreement concluded between Lukoil-Komi and a local NGO, Izvatas, could be a step forward in achieving a local SLO.","PeriodicalId":202575,"journal":{"name":"The Yearbook of Polar Law Online","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Yearbook of Polar Law Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22116427_009010007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article focuses on the participatory rights of local people living in the areas of extensive oil industry operations in the Izhemskii district of the Komi Republic in Russia. The district has long been suffering from oil leaks and resulting negative environmental impacts. Lukoil-Komi bought the business directly after the Soviet era and inherited the ecological threats related to old and rusty pipelines. Lukoil-Komi has promised to put things in order, but a great deal remains to be done.This article scrutinizes how statutory law and private governance interact in protecting the participatory rights of local people living in the vicinity of oil production in Komi. First, we evaluate what participatory rights Russian legislation guarantees to local people when oil production arrives in a new area or when new wells are being explored or opened. Second, we elaborate how the major oil company in the region – Lukoil-Komi – fulfills its corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the area of participatory rights and how local people feel about their possibility to exercise their participatory rights. As participatory rights, we discuss both procedural justice with public hearings and distributive justice in the form of benefit-sharing between the company and local community. The wider perspective on participation is due to Russian CSR practices. In Russia, companies tend to earn their Social License to Operate (SLO) through benefit-sharing, often within private governance. This practice is based on the social partnership agreements between authorities and companies. These contracts have path-dependent features resembling earlier Soviet solutions. The same can be claimed to apply to a wider SLO with more focus on local communities. We argue that Lukoil-Komi has not yet been able to achieve an SLO (local acceptance) due to the lack of participatory rights and continuing environmental problems. Most local people are not willing to trade a clean environment and participatory rights for the social benefits the company offers. However, the social partnership agreement concluded between Lukoil-Komi and a local NGO, Izvatas, could be a step forward in achieving a local SLO.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄罗斯的采掘业和公众参与:以科米共和国伊热姆斯基区的石油工业为例
本文的重点是生活在俄罗斯科米共和国伊热姆斯基地区广泛的石油工业作业地区的当地人民的参与权。该地区长期遭受石油泄漏和由此产生的负面环境影响。Lukoil-Komi在苏联时代结束后直接收购了这家公司,并继承了与老旧生锈的管道有关的生态威胁。卢克伊尔-科米已经承诺要把事情整理好,但是还有很多事情要做。本文仔细研究了成文法和私人治理如何相互作用,以保护生活在科米石油生产附近的当地人民的参与权。首先,我们评估了当石油生产到达一个新的地区或当新的油井被勘探或打开时,俄罗斯立法保证了当地人民的参与权。其次,我们详细阐述了该地区的主要石油公司Lukoil-Komi如何在参与权领域履行其企业社会责任(CSR),以及当地人如何看待他们行使参与权的可能性。作为参与性权利,我们既讨论了公开听证会形式的程序正义,也讨论了公司与当地社区之间利益分享形式的分配正义。更广泛的参与视角是由于俄罗斯的企业社会责任实践。在俄罗斯,公司往往通过利益分享获得社会经营许可证(SLO),通常是在私人治理中。这种做法是基于当局和公司之间的社会伙伴关系协议。这些合同具有路径依赖的特征,类似于早期的苏联解决方案。这同样适用于更广泛的SLO,更多地关注当地社区。我们认为,由于缺乏参与权和持续的环境问题,Lukoil-Komi尚未能够实现SLO(当地接受)。大多数当地人不愿意用清洁的环境和参与权来换取公司提供的社会福利。但是,Lukoil-Komi与当地非政府组织Izvatas之间缔结的社会伙伴关系协定可能是在实现当地社会劳动组织方面向前迈出的一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Snjólaug Árnadóttir. Climate Change and Maritime Boundaries: Legal Consequences of Sea Level Rise, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2022, pp. 304. ISBN: 978-1-316-51789-5 Polar Policy in Practice: Tour Guiding in Antarctica Recalcitrant Materialities of a Liminal Ocean: Deconstructing the ‘Arctic Nomos’ Legal Personality in Antarctica The 2018 Judgment by the European Court of Justice on Antarctic MPAS and Its Possible Significance to the Antarctic Treaty System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1