Effectiveness of Structured Video-Assisted Learning vs Demonstration on Closed Tracheal Suction Among Undergraduate Student Nurses

R. Jairus, Ritu P Naihar, Sangeetha Samuel
{"title":"Effectiveness of Structured Video-Assisted Learning vs Demonstration on Closed Tracheal Suction Among Undergraduate Student Nurses","authors":"R. Jairus, Ritu P Naihar, Sangeetha Samuel","doi":"10.1177/0974150X221141743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background During pandemic only a few sick patients were admitted to the hospital. Hence, for most of the clinical teaching of student nurses, nursing faculty has to be dependent on teaching in the laboratory. The teaching was done either on simulators or by video-assisted teaching instead of the traditional demonstration method. It is imperative to assess the impact of these methods of teaching on the skill of nursing students. Aim To assess the effectiveness of structured video-assisted learning (VAL) vs demonstration of closed tracheal suction (CTS) in developing skill of undergraduate student nurses. Methodology A quasi-experimental, posttest control group design was adopted. A total of 60 undergraduate B.Sc. second-year student nurses (30 in the demonstration and 30 in the VAL group) were enrolled in this study. The tools used were knowledge assessment tool (KAT) on CTS, practice assessment tool (PAT) to assess the knowledge and skill of CTS simultaneously. Google forms with a five-point Likert scale were developed to assess the perception of Students and Faculty regarding VAL on CTS. Results The mean scores of CTS were significantly higher in the demonstration group when compared with the VAL group at P < 0.05. Conclusion Students liked the video, but the demonstration was proved to be a better method to develop the skill in CTS.","PeriodicalId":272374,"journal":{"name":"Nursing & Midwifery Research Journal","volume":"36 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing & Midwifery Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0974150X221141743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background During pandemic only a few sick patients were admitted to the hospital. Hence, for most of the clinical teaching of student nurses, nursing faculty has to be dependent on teaching in the laboratory. The teaching was done either on simulators or by video-assisted teaching instead of the traditional demonstration method. It is imperative to assess the impact of these methods of teaching on the skill of nursing students. Aim To assess the effectiveness of structured video-assisted learning (VAL) vs demonstration of closed tracheal suction (CTS) in developing skill of undergraduate student nurses. Methodology A quasi-experimental, posttest control group design was adopted. A total of 60 undergraduate B.Sc. second-year student nurses (30 in the demonstration and 30 in the VAL group) were enrolled in this study. The tools used were knowledge assessment tool (KAT) on CTS, practice assessment tool (PAT) to assess the knowledge and skill of CTS simultaneously. Google forms with a five-point Likert scale were developed to assess the perception of Students and Faculty regarding VAL on CTS. Results The mean scores of CTS were significantly higher in the demonstration group when compared with the VAL group at P < 0.05. Conclusion Students liked the video, but the demonstration was proved to be a better method to develop the skill in CTS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结构化视频辅助学习与示范在本科护士闭式气管吸引中的效果
背景:在大流行期间,只有少数病人入院。因此,对于大多数实习护士的临床教学,护理教师必须依赖于实验室教学。教学采用模拟器或视频辅助教学,取代了传统的示范教学方法。评估这些教学方法对护生技能的影响是十分必要的。目的评价结构化视频辅助学习(VAL)与闭式气管吸引示范(CTS)在培养本科护士技能方面的效果。方法采用准实验、后测对照组设计。本研究共招募60名本科本科二年级护生,其中示范组30名,VAL组30名。使用知识评估工具(KAT)和实践评估工具(PAT)对CTS的知识和技能进行同时评估。开发了带有五点李克特量表的谷歌表格,以评估学生和教师对CTS上VAL的看法。结果示范组CTS平均评分显著高于VAL组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论学生们喜欢视频,但在CTS中,演示被证明是一种更好的培养技能的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Experiences of Nurses Caring for Children Under Five Years with Burns at a Teaching Hospital in Ghana Distribution of Lifestyle Risk Factors and Biophysical/Biochemical Parameters Related to NCD Prevention Among Nurses in Selected Government Hospitals of Chandigarh, India (2020–2022): A Multicentered Cross-sectional Study Effect of Upright Positioning on the Process and Outcome of Labour Among Parturient in Primary Health Care Setting Barriers and Facilitators Related to Nasal Injury Among Preterm Neonates in Selected Neonatal Units of a Tertiary Care Centre, North India A Study to Assess the Knowledge Regarding Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Among Staff of Ambulance, Equipped Status of Ambulances, and their Utilization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1