A framework for a clinical reasoning knowledge warehouse

Klaus Vilstrup Pedersen
{"title":"A framework for a clinical reasoning knowledge warehouse","authors":"Klaus Vilstrup Pedersen","doi":"10.1109/IDEADH.2004.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In many areas of the medical domain, the decision process i.e. reasoning, involving health care professionals is distributed, cooperative and complex. This paper presents a framework for a clinical reasoning knowledge warehouse that combines theories and models from artificial intelligence, knowledge management systems and business intelligence to make context based, patient case specific analysis and knowledge management. The knowledge base integrates three sources of information that supports clinical reasoning: general information, guidelines and health records. New generalized knowledge is stored and made accessible when relevant to the reasoning context and the specific patient case. Furthermore, the information structure supports the creation of new generalized knowledge using data mining tools. The patient case is divided into an observation level and an opinion level. At the opinion level, reasoning participants can express their argument based opinions about a patient case, thereby enhancing the knowledge about the state of and plans for the patient. An opinion language that supports expressing a possible imprecise/uncertain opinion based on imprecise/uncertain/incomplete arguments is introduced. Finally, case based reasoning is used for retrieving similar patient cases and adapt the opinions in the current case.","PeriodicalId":176711,"journal":{"name":"2004 IDEAS Workshop on Medical Information Systems: The Digital Hospital (IDEAS-DH'04)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2004 IDEAS Workshop on Medical Information Systems: The Digital Hospital (IDEAS-DH'04)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IDEADH.2004.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In many areas of the medical domain, the decision process i.e. reasoning, involving health care professionals is distributed, cooperative and complex. This paper presents a framework for a clinical reasoning knowledge warehouse that combines theories and models from artificial intelligence, knowledge management systems and business intelligence to make context based, patient case specific analysis and knowledge management. The knowledge base integrates three sources of information that supports clinical reasoning: general information, guidelines and health records. New generalized knowledge is stored and made accessible when relevant to the reasoning context and the specific patient case. Furthermore, the information structure supports the creation of new generalized knowledge using data mining tools. The patient case is divided into an observation level and an opinion level. At the opinion level, reasoning participants can express their argument based opinions about a patient case, thereby enhancing the knowledge about the state of and plans for the patient. An opinion language that supports expressing a possible imprecise/uncertain opinion based on imprecise/uncertain/incomplete arguments is introduced. Finally, case based reasoning is used for retrieving similar patient cases and adapt the opinions in the current case.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床推理知识库框架
在医疗领域的许多领域,决策过程,即推理,涉及卫生保健专业人员是分布式的,合作的和复杂的。本文提出了一个临床推理知识库的框架,该框架结合了人工智能、知识管理系统和商业智能的理论和模型,实现了基于上下文的、针对具体病例的分析和知识管理。知识库集成了支持临床推理的三个信息源:一般信息、指南和健康记录。当与推理上下文和特定患者病例相关时,新的广义知识被存储和访问。此外,信息结构支持使用数据挖掘工具创建新的广义知识。病例分为观察级和意见级。在意见层面,推理参与者可以表达他们对患者病例的基于论点的意见,从而增强对患者状态和计划的了解。介绍了一种支持基于不精确/不确定/不完整论据表达可能的不精确/不确定意见的意见语言。最后,使用基于案例的推理方法检索相似的患者案例,并对当前案例中的观点进行调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Supporting information management for regional health information systems by models with communication path analysis Genericity of an epidemiological network for nephrology and rheumatology Advancing electronic health records in Canada: why, how and key learnings of potential value to China Rethinking of medical information retrieval and access Managing Pan-European mammography images and data using a service oriented architecture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1