Performance specification of software components

M. Sitaraman, J. Krone, W. Ogden
{"title":"Performance specification of software components","authors":"M. Sitaraman, J. Krone, W. Ogden","doi":"10.1145/375212.375223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Component-based software engineering is concerned with predictability in both functional and performance behavior, though most formal techniques have typically focused their attention on the former. Reasoning about the (functional or performance) behavior of a component-based system must be compositional in order to be scalable. Compositional performance reasoning demands that components include performance specifications, in addition to descriptions of functional behavior. Unfortunately, as explained in this paper, classical techniques and notations for performance analysis are either unsuitable or unnatural to capture performance behaviors of generic software components. They fail to work in the presence of parameterization and layering. The paper introduces elements of a compositional approach to performance analysis using a detailed example. It explains that performance specification problems are so basic that there are unresolved research issues to be tackled even for the simplest reusable components. These issues must be tackled by any practical proposal for sound performance reasoning. Only then will software developers be able to engineer new systems by choosing and assembling components that best fit their performance (time and space) requirements.","PeriodicalId":270366,"journal":{"name":"ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on Software Reusability","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"82","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on Software Reusability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/375212.375223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 82

Abstract

Component-based software engineering is concerned with predictability in both functional and performance behavior, though most formal techniques have typically focused their attention on the former. Reasoning about the (functional or performance) behavior of a component-based system must be compositional in order to be scalable. Compositional performance reasoning demands that components include performance specifications, in addition to descriptions of functional behavior. Unfortunately, as explained in this paper, classical techniques and notations for performance analysis are either unsuitable or unnatural to capture performance behaviors of generic software components. They fail to work in the presence of parameterization and layering. The paper introduces elements of a compositional approach to performance analysis using a detailed example. It explains that performance specification problems are so basic that there are unresolved research issues to be tackled even for the simplest reusable components. These issues must be tackled by any practical proposal for sound performance reasoning. Only then will software developers be able to engineer new systems by choosing and assembling components that best fit their performance (time and space) requirements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
软件组件的性能规范
基于组件的软件工程关注功能行为和性能行为的可预测性,尽管大多数正式技术通常将注意力集中在前者上。基于组件的系统的(功能或性能)行为推理必须是组合的,以便可伸缩。组合性能推理要求组件除了功能行为的描述外,还包括性能规范。不幸的是,正如本文所解释的那样,用于性能分析的经典技术和符号要么不适合,要么不自然,无法捕获通用软件组件的性能行为。它们在参数化和分层的情况下无法工作。本文通过一个详细的例子介绍了性能分析的组合方法的要素。它解释说,性能规范问题是如此基本,以至于即使对于最简单的可重用组件,也有尚未解决的研究问题需要解决。这些问题必须通过任何关于合理性能推理的实际建议来解决。只有这样,软件开发人员才能通过选择和组装最适合其性能(时间和空间)要求的组件来设计新系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Vacuity of the Open Source Security Testing Methodology Manual Building Blocks in Standards: Improving Consistency in Standardization with Ontology and Reasoning Great Expectations: A Critique of Current Approaches to Random Number Generation Testing & Certification Co-ordinating Developers and High-Risk Users of Privacy-Enhanced Secure Messaging Protocols hacspec: Towards Verifiable Crypto Standards
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1