Bernhard Stiehl, M. Otto, Malcolm K. Newmyer, Max K. Fortin, Tommy Genova, K. Ahmed, J. Kapat, Stefano Orsino, C. Arguinzoni
{"title":"Numerical Study of Three Gaseous Fuels on the Reactor Length and Pollutant Formation Under Lean Gas Turbine Conditions","authors":"Bernhard Stiehl, M. Otto, Malcolm K. Newmyer, Max K. Fortin, Tommy Genova, K. Ahmed, J. Kapat, Stefano Orsino, C. Arguinzoni","doi":"10.1115/gt2022-83343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present paper numerically studies the impact of three gaseous fuels on the reaction characteristics and pollutant formation in a lean combustion system. The models include an equilibrium calculation with Ansys-Chemkin-Pro, as well as a 3D half-width CFD model using Large Eddy Simulation (LES) and Adaptive Mesh Refinement (AMR) models. The outcomes are targeted to benefit the transition to carbon-free operation of aviation turbines. Three fuels, methane (CH4), hydrogen (H2), and ammonia (NH3) as well as blends thereof were compared at constant equivalence ratios to obtain a firing temperature level of T = 1800°C. The kinetic mechanism in use was suggested and validated by Okafor et al., including 42 species to describe CH4/H2/NH3-air combustion and NOx chemistry. The formation of nitrogen oxide pollutants (NO, NO2 and N2O) were analyzed to determine the sensitivity to the three fuels and their blends. Secondly, a fuel injector scaling study was performed, and a significantly larger jet diameter was selected to compensate for the increased stoichiometric mixture fraction and reduced blend density relative to CH4-fueled architecture. Lastly, the three-dimensional AMR-LES model provided validation of the injector re-sizing, as well as further insight into the expected fuel-air distribution by convective mixing. While the substitution of methane-fueled gas turbines with carbon-free alternatives is generally feasible, blending of H2 and NH3 fuels could be a promising strategy to utilize existing turbine combustors, while retaining reaction timescales close to those of CH4-powered systems.","PeriodicalId":395231,"journal":{"name":"Volume 3B: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions","volume":"12 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 3B: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2022-83343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The present paper numerically studies the impact of three gaseous fuels on the reaction characteristics and pollutant formation in a lean combustion system. The models include an equilibrium calculation with Ansys-Chemkin-Pro, as well as a 3D half-width CFD model using Large Eddy Simulation (LES) and Adaptive Mesh Refinement (AMR) models. The outcomes are targeted to benefit the transition to carbon-free operation of aviation turbines. Three fuels, methane (CH4), hydrogen (H2), and ammonia (NH3) as well as blends thereof were compared at constant equivalence ratios to obtain a firing temperature level of T = 1800°C. The kinetic mechanism in use was suggested and validated by Okafor et al., including 42 species to describe CH4/H2/NH3-air combustion and NOx chemistry. The formation of nitrogen oxide pollutants (NO, NO2 and N2O) were analyzed to determine the sensitivity to the three fuels and their blends. Secondly, a fuel injector scaling study was performed, and a significantly larger jet diameter was selected to compensate for the increased stoichiometric mixture fraction and reduced blend density relative to CH4-fueled architecture. Lastly, the three-dimensional AMR-LES model provided validation of the injector re-sizing, as well as further insight into the expected fuel-air distribution by convective mixing. While the substitution of methane-fueled gas turbines with carbon-free alternatives is generally feasible, blending of H2 and NH3 fuels could be a promising strategy to utilize existing turbine combustors, while retaining reaction timescales close to those of CH4-powered systems.