Proposed Hypothesis on replacing Non-Deterministic Approach to Abstraction due to the exhibition of faulty speculations

Shreya Indukuri, Anil Kumar Reddy Konda, M. J. Sharma
{"title":"Proposed Hypothesis on replacing Non-Deterministic Approach to Abstraction due to the exhibition of faulty speculations","authors":"Shreya Indukuri, Anil Kumar Reddy Konda, M. J. Sharma","doi":"10.15439/2020KM17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"— Non-Determinism is the word that is used to refer to an event or a series of the same that is said to be unpredictable but is assumed to be belonging to a domain of possibilities. From the inception, non-deterministic approaches have played a huge role in statistics, machine design, the definition of Random, and a few other domains to mention. Non-Deter-ministic processes are defined as the paths that lead to no fixed state but a set of possible states instead. One of the crucial reasons would be delving into the human understanding of processes and the ability to justify happenings around. A behavior that has accumulated throughout the evolution of mankind is to explain boundaries based on what is being perceived. The argument of Human Understanding of processes around can be of huge prominence as they play a vital role in explaining and demystifying a lot of misconceptions. One such aspect that is a resultant of this phenomenon would be a nondeterministic approach. The key focus of this paper will be on emphasizing how humans are limited to perceiving reality, how several mis-conceptions have accumulated around misstated definitions by the virtue of the same, have a closer look at Randomness, a sheer epitome of the same, and also propose a few potential applications that are affected by the hitherto stated problem.","PeriodicalId":390542,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Research in Management & Technovation","volume":"5 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Research in Management & Technovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15439/2020KM17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

— Non-Determinism is the word that is used to refer to an event or a series of the same that is said to be unpredictable but is assumed to be belonging to a domain of possibilities. From the inception, non-deterministic approaches have played a huge role in statistics, machine design, the definition of Random, and a few other domains to mention. Non-Deter-ministic processes are defined as the paths that lead to no fixed state but a set of possible states instead. One of the crucial reasons would be delving into the human understanding of processes and the ability to justify happenings around. A behavior that has accumulated throughout the evolution of mankind is to explain boundaries based on what is being perceived. The argument of Human Understanding of processes around can be of huge prominence as they play a vital role in explaining and demystifying a lot of misconceptions. One such aspect that is a resultant of this phenomenon would be a nondeterministic approach. The key focus of this paper will be on emphasizing how humans are limited to perceiving reality, how several mis-conceptions have accumulated around misstated definitions by the virtue of the same, have a closer look at Randomness, a sheer epitome of the same, and also propose a few potential applications that are affected by the hitherto stated problem.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
由于错误推测的出现而提出的替代非确定性抽象方法的假设
-非决定论这个词是用来指一个事件或一系列相同的,据说是不可预测的,但被认为是属于可能性的领域。从一开始,非确定性方法就在统计学、机器设计、随机定义和其他一些领域发挥了巨大的作用。非确定性过程被定义为没有固定状态,而是一组可能状态的路径。其中一个关键原因将是深入研究人类对过程的理解以及为周围发生的事情辩护的能力。在人类进化过程中积累的一种行为是根据所感知的东西来解释边界。人类对周围过程的理解的论点可以非常突出,因为它们在解释和消除许多误解方面发挥了至关重要的作用。这种现象的结果之一就是不确定性方法。本文的重点是强调人类是如何局限于感知现实的,一些错误的概念是如何通过相同的美德围绕错误的定义积累起来的,仔细研究随机性,这是相同的一个纯粹的例子,并提出一些受迄今为止所述问题影响的潜在应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using Google translate in teaching and learning activities for English - medium - instruction (EMI) subjects Social Capital development amongst college and university students in online and classroom education Corporate social responsibility and employee loyalty: Role of pride and commitment Impact of leadership's perspective on the effectiveness of operational risk management at the Vietnamese commercial banks Alliance Orientation and University's Performances: The Moderating Roles of Organizational Characteristics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1