Program Verification Enhanced Precise Analysis of Interrupt-Driven Program Vulnerabilities

Xiang Du, Liangze Yin, Haining Feng, Wei Dong
{"title":"Program Verification Enhanced Precise Analysis of Interrupt-Driven Program Vulnerabilities","authors":"Xiang Du, Liangze Yin, Haining Feng, Wei Dong","doi":"10.1109/APSEC53868.2021.00033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the non-deterministic occurring of interrupt service routines, vulnerabilities of interrupt-driven programs, such as data race and atomicity violation, are usually hard to discover. Static analysis is an effective method for vulnerability analysis of interrupt-driven programs. However, existing techniques usually produce a large number of false alarms, which limits the application of static analysis in practice. To achieve high precision in vulnerability analysis of interrupt-driven programs, this paper proposes a program verification enhanced precise analysis method. For each potential vulnerability detected by static analysis, we propose a vulnerability validation approach which employs program verification to further automatically verify its feasibility. We have implemented a prototype of our method on top of CBMC. Experimental results on both an academic benchmark and 24 real-world programs show that our method can successfully identify true vulnerabilities and achieve a high precise analysis.","PeriodicalId":143800,"journal":{"name":"2021 28th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 28th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC53868.2021.00033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to the non-deterministic occurring of interrupt service routines, vulnerabilities of interrupt-driven programs, such as data race and atomicity violation, are usually hard to discover. Static analysis is an effective method for vulnerability analysis of interrupt-driven programs. However, existing techniques usually produce a large number of false alarms, which limits the application of static analysis in practice. To achieve high precision in vulnerability analysis of interrupt-driven programs, this paper proposes a program verification enhanced precise analysis method. For each potential vulnerability detected by static analysis, we propose a vulnerability validation approach which employs program verification to further automatically verify its feasibility. We have implemented a prototype of our method on top of CBMC. Experimental results on both an academic benchmark and 24 real-world programs show that our method can successfully identify true vulnerabilities and achieve a high precise analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
程序验证增强了中断驱动程序漏洞的精确分析
由于中断服务程序的不确定性,中断驱动程序的数据竞争、原子性冲突等漏洞往往难以发现。静态分析是中断驱动程序漏洞分析的有效方法。然而,现有的技术往往会产生大量的虚警,这限制了静态分析在实际中的应用。为了实现中断驱动程序漏洞分析的高精度,本文提出了一种程序验证增强的精确分析方法。针对静态分析检测到的每一个潜在漏洞,我们提出了一种漏洞验证方法,利用程序验证进一步自动验证其可行性。我们已经在CBMC之上实现了我们方法的原型。在一个学术基准和24个实际程序上的实验结果表明,我们的方法能够成功地识别出真实的漏洞,并实现了高精度的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Verification Assisted Gas Reduction for Smart Contracts Effective Bug Triage Based on a Hybrid Neural Network Learn To Align: A Code Alignment Network For Code Clone Detection Framework for Recommending Data Residency Compliant Application Architecture Degree doesn't Matter: Identifying the Drivers of Interaction in Software Development Ecosystems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1